IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8885-d1498227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Tea Farmers’ Cognition on Green Production Behavior in Jingmai Mountain: Chain Mediation by Social and Personal Norms and the Moderating Role of Government Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Yingzhou Xianyu

    (College of Economics and Management, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

  • Hua Long

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

  • Zhifeng Wang

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

  • Long Meng

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

  • Feiyu Duan

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

Abstract

China’s agricultural sector faces significant challenges, including fragmented farming practices, limited farmer knowledge of sustainable production, and outdated pest control technologies. These issues result in improper fertilization, pesticide application, and disposal of agricultural inputs, contributing to agricultural non-point source pollution and hindering the transition to a green economy. Thus, promoting green production behavior among farmers is critical for achieving carbon peaking, carbon neutrality, and harmonious coexistence between humans and nature. However, the existing literature on this topic is still relatively scarce. This study aims to investigate the impact of farmers’ cognition on their green production behavior (GPB). Considering the role of policy, this study also examines the moderating effect of government regulation in this relationship. An analysis of 306 survey responses from tea farmers in Jingmai Mountain, Pu’er City, Yunnan Province, reveals that farmers’ cognition exerts a significant and positive impact on GPB. Social norms and personal norms serve as chain mediators in the relationship between farmers’ cognition and GPB. Moreover, government regulation moderates the influence of farmers’ cognition on social norms, further amplifying its impact on them. This study advances the theoretical understanding of farmers’ behavior and offers practical insights for fostering the sustainable development of the tea industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingzhou Xianyu & Hua Long & Zhifeng Wang & Long Meng & Feiyu Duan, 2024. "The Impact of Tea Farmers’ Cognition on Green Production Behavior in Jingmai Mountain: Chain Mediation by Social and Personal Norms and the Moderating Role of Government Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8885-:d:1498227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tian Liu & Boyang Zhou, 2023. "Research on the Optimization Path of Green Development in Shaanxi Province Based on the OECD’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Heesup Han & Hossein G.T. Olya & Jinkyung (Jenny) Kim & Wansoo Kim, 2018. "Model of sustainable behavior: Assessing cognitive, emotional and normative influence in the cruise context," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 789-800, November.
    3. Jayson Beckman & Maros Ivanic & Jeremy Jelliffe, 2022. "Market impacts of Farm to Fork: Reducing agricultural input usage," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1995-2013, December.
    4. Manh Hung Le & Phuong Mai Nguyen, 2022. "Integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Norm Activation Model to Investigate Organic Food Purchase Intention: Evidence from Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. John Whalley, 2005. "Rationality, Irrationality and Economic Cognition," CESifo Working Paper Series 1445, CESifo.
    6. Bonnie Averbuch & Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe & Chris Kjeldsen, 2022. "Using fuzzy cognitive mapping and social capital to explain differences in sustainability perceptions between farmers in the northeast US and Denmark," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 435-453, March.
    7. Jane Mills & Peter Gaskell & Julie Ingram & Janet Dwyer & Matt Reed & Christopher Short, 2017. "Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(2), pages 283-299, June.
    8. Robyn S. Wilson & Atar Herziger & Matthew Hamilton & Jeremy S. Brooks, 2020. "From incremental to transformative adaptation in individual responses to climate-exacerbated hazards," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(3), pages 200-208, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ouellet, F. & Mundler, P. & Dupras, J. & Ruiz, J., 2020. "“Community developed and farmer delivered.” An analysis of the spatial and relational proximities of the Alternative Land Use Services program in Ontario," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Davide Dell’Unto & Gabriele Dono & Raffaele Cortignani, 2023. "Impacts of Environmental Targets on the Livestock Sector: An Assessment Tool Applied to Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Ahmed Moustapha Mfokeu & Elie Virgile Chrysostome & Jean-Pierre Gueyie & Olivier Ebenezer Mun Ngapna, 2023. "Consumer Motivation behind the Use of Ecological Charcoal in Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Mehryar, Sara & Sasson, Idan & Surminski, Swenja, 2022. "Supporting urban adaptation to climate change: what role can resilience measurement tools play?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113367, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Hilary Byerly Flint & Paul Cada & Patricia A. Champ & Jamie Gomez & Danny Margoles & James R. Meldrum & Hannah Brenkert-Smith, 2022. "You vs. us: framing adaptation behavior in terms of private or social benefits," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Kuhfuss, Laure & Préget, Raphaële & Thoyer, Sophie & de Vries, Frans P. & Hanley, Nick, 2022. "Enhancing spatial coordination in payment for ecosystem services schemes with non-pecuniary preferences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Zagaria, Cecilia & Schulp, Catharina J.E. & Zavalloni, Matteo & Viaggi, Davide & Verburg, Peter H., 2021. "Modelling transformational adaptation to climate change among crop farming systems in Romagna, Italy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Thorsøe, Martin Hvarregaard & Noe, Egon Bjørnshave & Lamandé, Mathieu & Frelih-Larsen, Ana & Kjeldsen, Chris & Zandersen, Marianne & Schjønning, Per, 2019. "Sustainable soil management - Farmers’ perspectives on subsoil compaction and the opportunities and barriers for intervention," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 427-437.
    9. Maros Ivanic & Jayson Beckman & Noe Nava, 2023. "Estimation of the Value-Added/Intermediate Input Substitution Elasticities Consistent with the GTAP Data," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 8(2), pages 134-158, December.
    10. Yaofeng Yang & Yajuan Chen & Zhenrong Yu & Pengyao Li & Xuedong Li, 2020. "How Does Improve Farmers’ Attitudes toward Ecosystem Services to Support Sustainable Development of Agriculture? Based on Environmental Kuznets Curve Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Mehran, Javaneh & Olya, Hossein GT., 2020. "Canal boat tourism: Application of complexity theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    12. Veronika Winter & Johanna Kranz & Andrea Möller, 2022. "Climate Change Education Challenges from Two Different Perspectives of Change Agents: Perceptions of School Students and Pre-Service Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-29, May.
    13. Kerstin Jantke & Martina J. Hartmann & Livia Rasche & Benjamin Blanz & Uwe A. Schneider, 2020. "Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Knowledge and Positions of German Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Gil-Clavel, Sofia & Wagenblast, Thorid & Filatova, Tatiana, 2023. "Farmers’ Incremental and Transformational Climate Change Adaptation in Different Regions: A Natural Language Processing Comparative Literature Review," SocArXiv 3dp5e, Center for Open Science.
    15. Patrick Baur, 2020. "When farmers are pulled in too many directions: comparing institutional drivers of food safety and environmental sustainability in California agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 1175-1194, December.
    16. Tao Xia & Elias G. Carayannis & Stavros Sindakis & Saloome Showkat & Nikos Kanellos, 2024. "Technology transfer for sustainable rural development: evidence from homestead withdrawal with compensation in Chengdu–Chongqing," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 303-333, February.
    17. Ogawa, Keishi & Garrod, Guy & Yagi, Hironori, 2023. "Sustainability strategies and stakeholder management for upland farming," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Tong Hu & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Nurul Hassan Reza & Mengling Wu & Qing Yang, 2024. "Examining consumers’ willingness to pay premium price for organic food," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Xinyu Yuan & Caojun Huang & Guixiang Tao & Shujuan Yi & Yifei Li, 2024. "Design and Experiment of Oil-Electric Hybrid Air-Suction Sorghum Plot Seeder," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Ernesto Mesa-Vázquez & Juan F. Velasco-Muñoz & José A. Aznar-Sánchez & Belén López-Felices, 2021. "Three Decades of Behavioural Economics in Agriculture. An Overview of Global Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8885-:d:1498227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.