IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7284-d1463226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral Intention to Purchase Sustainable Food: Generation Z’s Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Dominika Jakubowska

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, Department of Market and Consumption, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 2, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Aneta Zofia Dąbrowska

    (Faculty of Food Science, Department of Dairy Science and Quality Management, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 7, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Bogdan Pachołek

    (Institute of Marketing, Department of Product Marketing, Poznań University of Economics and Business, al. Niepodleglosci 10, 61-875 Poznan, Poland)

  • Sylwia Sady

    (Institute of Quality Science, Department of Natural Science and Quality Assurance, Poznań University of Economics and Business, al. Niepodleglosci 10, 61-875 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

Sustainable food consumption is critical for addressing global environmental challenges and promoting health and ethical practices. Understanding what drives sustainable food choices among younger generations, particularly Generation Z, is essential for developing effective strategies to encourage sustainable consumption patterns. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior as the theoretical framework, this study aims to explore how the variables of the theory (personal attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control), along with consumer knowledge, trust, and health concerns, affect Generation Z’s intentions to buy sustainable food. The research was carried out in Poland via the online interview method (CAWI), with 438 users ranging between the ages 18 and 27. The results show that attitudes and knowledge are significant predictors of sustainable food consumption among Generation Z, while subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, health consciousness, and trust do not significantly affect purchase intentions. This research underscores the importance of educational campaigns and marketing strategies that enhance consumer knowledge and shape positive attitudes towards sustainable food. These insights offer valuable implications for policymakers, marketers, and educators aiming to encourage sustainable practices. Understanding the drivers of Generation Z’s sustainable food consumption behaviors can provide valuable insights for developing effective strategies to promote sustainable consumption patterns. This study adds to the body of knowledge on sustainable food consumption by highlighting the specific factors that drive Generation Z’s purchasing intentions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominika Jakubowska & Aneta Zofia Dąbrowska & Bogdan Pachołek & Sylwia Sady, 2024. "Behavioral Intention to Purchase Sustainable Food: Generation Z’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7284-:d:1463226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7284/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7284/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hong Wang & Baolong Ma & Rubing Bai, 2019. "How Does Green Product Knowledge Effectively Promote Green Purchase Intention?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Samia Ayyub & Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Asim Nawaz, 2021. "Drivers of Organic Food Purchase Intention in a Developing Country: The Mediating Role of Trust," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    3. Konuk, Faruk Anıl, 2018. "The role of store image, perceived quality, trust and perceived value in predicting consumers’ purchase intentions towards organic private label food," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 304-310.
    4. Song-Lin Wong & Cheng-Chin Hsu & Han-Shen Chen, 2018. "To Buy or Not to Buy? Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions for Suboptimal Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Kamonthip Maichum & Surakiat Parichatnon & Ke-Chung Peng, 2016. "Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model to Investigate Purchase Intention of Green Products among Thai Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Shian-Yang Tzeng & Tzu-Ya Ho, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Product Knowledge, Trust, and Distrust in the Health Belief Model to Predict Attitude Toward Dietary Supplements," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    7. Marija Ham & Marina Jeger & Anita Frajman Ivković, 2015. "The role of subjective norms in forming the intention to purchase green food," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 738-748, January.
    8. Peschel, Anne & Grebitus, Carola & Steiner, Bodo & Veeman, Michele, 2016. "How does consumer knowledge affect environmentally sustainable choices? Evidence from a cross-country latent class analysis of food labels," MPRA Paper 69864, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Krittinee Nuttavuthisit & John Thøgersen, 2017. "The Importance of Consumer Trust for the Emergence of a Market for Green Products: The Case of Organic Food," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 323-337, January.
    10. Teofana Dimitrova & Iliana Ilieva & Mina Angelova, 2022. "Exploring Factors Affecting Sustainable Consumption Behaviour," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raven Gio Charles A. Bajar & Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Josephine D. German, 2024. "Determining Sustainable Purchase Behavior for Green Products from Name-Brand Shops: A Gen Z Perspective in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Pedro Cuesta-Valiño & Pablo Gutiérrez Rodríguez & Estela Núñez-Barriopedro, 2020. "Perception of Advertisements for Healthy Food on Social Media: Effect of Attitude on Consumers’ Response," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Aline Carla Petkowicz & Tatiane Pelegrini & Brian William Bodah & Carlos Daniel Rotini & Leila Dal Moro & Alcindo Neckel & Caroline Pauletto Spanhol & Elton Gean Araújo & Jandir Pauli & Giana de Varga, 2024. "Purchasing Intention of Products with Sustainable Packaging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Abdullah Al Mamun & Naeem Hayat & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Anas A. Salameh & Syed Shah Alam, 2023. "Green Gardening Practices Among Urban Botanists: Using the Value-Belief-Norm Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    6. Ladwein, Richard & Sánchez Romero, Andrea Milena, 2021. "The role of trust in the relationship between consumers, producers and retailers of organic food: A sector-based approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Giray, Caner & Yon, Belma & Alniacik, Umit & Girisken, Yener, 2022. "How does mothers’ mood matter on their choice of organic food? Controlled eye-tracking study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1175-1185.
    8. Roh, Taewoo & Seok, Junhee & Kim, Yaeri, 2022. "Unveiling ways to reach organic purchase: Green perceived value, perceived knowledge, attitude, subjective norm, and trust," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Alencar Bravo & Darli Vieira & Thais Ayres Rebello, 2022. "The Origins, Evolution, Current State, and Future of Green Products and Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, September.
    10. Wong Ming Wong & Shian-Yang Tzeng, 2021. "Mediating Role of Organic Labeling Awareness and Food Safety Attitudes in the Correlation Between Green Product Awareness and Purchase Intentions," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    11. Jingyang Chen & Qin Liu, 2023. "The Green Consumption Behavior Process Mechanism of New Energy Vehicles Driven by Big Data—From a Metacognitive Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Yu, Weiping & Han, Xiaoyun & Ding, Lei & He, Mingli, 2021. "Organic food corporate image and customer co-developing behavior: The mediating role of consumer trust and purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    13. Hsiao-Ping Chang & Chun-Chieh Ma & Han-Shen Chen, 2020. "The Impacts of Young Consumers’ Health Values on Functional Beverages Purchase Intentions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    14. Marimuthu, Malliga, 2019. "Young mothers’ acceptance of herbal food supplements: Centred on preventive health behaviour for children," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 311-319.
    15. Pablo Farías, 2020. "Promoting the Absence of Pesticides through Product Labels: The Role of Showing a Specific Description of the Harmful Effects, Environmental Attitude, and Familiarity with Pesticides," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-8, October.
    16. László Bendegúz Nagy & Brigitta Unger-Plasek & Zoltán Lakner & Ágoston Temesi, 2023. "Confidence in organic food: a cross-country choice based conjoint analysis of credibility factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Nguyen, Nguyen An Ngoc & Tran, Phuong Thi Kim & Pham, Huong-Giang & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2023. "The influence of environmental concerns and psychosocial factors on electric motorbike switching intention in the global south," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    18. Asuamah Yeboah, Samuel, 2023. "Sustaining Change: Unravelling the Socio-cultural Threads of Sustainable Consumption," MPRA Paper 117981, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Jun 2023.
    19. Wei Zheng & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison, 2023. "Applying a Combination of SEM and fsQCA to Predict Tourist Resource-Saving Behavioral Intentions in Rural Tourism: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    20. Ginder, Whitney & Byun, Sang-Eun, 2022. "To trust or not to trust? The interplay between labor-related CSR claim type and prior CSR reputation of apparel retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7284-:d:1463226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.