IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6976-d1456427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Wheat-Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Models under Climate Change Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Nida Iqbal

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Okara, Okara 56130, Pakistan
    Department of Technical Sciences, Western Caspian University, Baku AZ1001, Azerbaijan
    All authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Muhammad Umair Shahzad

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Okara, Okara 56130, Pakistan
    All authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • El-Sayed M. Sherif

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Al-Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
    All authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Muhammad Usman Tariq

    (Marketing, Operations and Information System, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi 971, United Arab Emirates
    Department of Education, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
    All authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Javed Rashid

    (Department of IT Services, University of Okara, Okara 56130, Pakistan
    Machine Learning Code Research Lab, 209 Zafar Colony, Okara 56300, Pakistan
    All authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Tuan-Vinh Le

    (Bachelor’s Program of Artificial Intelligence and Information Security, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan
    All authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Anwar Ghani

    (Department of Computer Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
    Big Data Research Center, Jeju National University, Jeju-do 63243, Republic of Korea
    All authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Climate change has emerged as one of the most significant challenges in modern agriculture, with potential implications for global food security. The impact of changing climatic conditions on crop yield, particularly for staple crops like wheat, has raised concerns about future food production. By integrating historical climate data, GCM (CMIP3) projections, and wheat-yield records, our analysis aims to provide significant insights into how climate change may affect wheat output. This research uses advanced machine learning models to explore the intricate relationship between climate change and wheat-yield prediction. Machine learning models used include multiple linear regression (MLR), boosted tree, random forest, ensemble models, and several types of ANNs: ANN (multi-layer perceptron), ANN (probabilistic neural network), ANN (generalized feed-forward), and ANN (linear regression). The model was evaluated and validated against yield and weather data from three Punjab, Pakistan, regions (1991–2021). The calibrated yield response model used downscaled global climate model (GCM) outputs for the SRA2, B1, and A1B average collective CO 2 emissions scenarios to anticipate yield changes through 2052. Results showed that maximum temperature (R = 0.116) was the primary climate factor affecting wheat yield in Punjab, preceding the T m i n (R = 0.114), while rainfall had a negligible impact (R = 0.000). The ensemble model (R = 0.988, nRMSE= 8.0%, MAE = 0.090) demonstrated outstanding yield performance, outperforming Random Forest Regression (R = 0.909, nRMSE = 18%, MAE = 0.182), ANN(MLP) (R = 0.902, MAE = 0.238, nRMSE = 17.0%), and boosting tree (R = 0.902, nRMSE = 20%, MAE = 0.198). ANN(PNN) performed inadequately. The ensemble model and RF showed better yield results with R 2 = 0.953, 0.791. The expected yield is 5.5% lower than the greatest average yield reported at the site in 2052. The study predicts that site-specific wheat output will experience a significant loss due to climate change. This decrease, which is anticipated to be 5.5% lower than the highest yield ever recorded, points to a potential future loss in wheat output that might worsen food insecurity. Additionally, our findings highlighted that ensemble approaches leveraging multiple model strengths could offer more accurate and reliable predictions under varying climate scenarios. This suggests a significant potential for integrating machine learning in developing climate-resilient agricultural practices, paving the way for future sustainable food security solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nida Iqbal & Muhammad Umair Shahzad & El-Sayed M. Sherif & Muhammad Usman Tariq & Javed Rashid & Tuan-Vinh Le & Anwar Ghani, 2024. "Analysis of Wheat-Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Models under Climate Change Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6976-:d:1456427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6976/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6976/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anurag Satpathi & Parul Setiya & Bappa Das & Ajeet Singh Nain & Prakash Kumar Jha & Surendra Singh & Shikha Singh, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Statistical and Machine Learning Techniques for Rice Yield Forecasting for Chhattisgarh, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Ishaque, Wajid & Osman, Raheel & Hafiza, Barira Shoukat & Malghani, Saadatullah & Zhao, Ben & Xu, Ming & Ata-Ul-Karim, Syed Tahir, 2023. "Quantifying the impacts of climate change on wheat phenology, yield, and evapotranspiration under irrigated and rainfed conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Ahmed, Moiz Uddin & Hussain, Iqbal, 2022. "Prediction of Wheat Production Using Machine Learning Algorithms in northern areas of Pakistan," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6).
    4. Xuan Yang & Zhan Tian & Laixiang Sun & Baode Chen & Francesco N. Tubiello & Yinlong Xu, 2017. "The impacts of increased heat stress events on wheat yield under climate change in China," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 605-620, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasan, M. Mehedi & Alauddin, Mohammad & Rashid Sarker, Md. Abdur & Jakaria, Mohammad & Alamgir, Mahiuddin, 2019. "Climate sensitivity of wheat yield in Bangladesh: Implications for the United Nations sustainable development goals 2 and 6," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Ahmad, Mirza Junaid & Iqbal, Muhammad Anjum & Choi, Kyung Sook, 2020. "Climate-driven constraints in sustaining future wheat yield and water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. R. K. Mall & Nidhi Singh & K. K. Singh & Geetika Sonkar & Akhilesh Gupta, 2018. "Evaluating the performance of RegCM4.0 climate model for climate change impact assessment on wheat and rice crop in diverse agro-climatic zones of Uttar Pradesh, India," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 503-515, August.
    4. Ayse Yavuz Ozalp & Halil Akinci, 2023. "Evaluation of Land Suitability for Olive ( Olea europaea L.) Cultivation Using the Random Forest Algorithm," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Nurhuda Nizar & Ahmad Danial Zainudin & Ali Albada & Chua Mei Shan, 2024. "Forecasting Short-Term FTSE Bursa Malaysia Using WEKA," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(2), pages 104-114.
    6. Patryk Hara & Magdalena Piekutowska & Gniewko Niedbała, 2022. "Prediction of Protein Content in Pea ( Pisum sativum L.) Seeds Using Artificial Neural Networks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Jin, Keyan & Zhong, Ziqi & Zhao, Elena Yifei, 2024. "Sustainable digital marketing under big data: an AI random forest model approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121402, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Saim Khalid & Hadi Mohsen Oqaibi & Muhammad Aqib & Yaser Hafeez, 2023. "Small Pests Detection in Field Crops Using Deep Learning Object Detection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    9. M. Mehedi Hasan & Mohammad Alauddin & Md. Abdur Rashid Sarker & Mohammad Jakaria & Mahiuddin Alamgir, 2018. "Climate sensitivity of wheat yield in Bangladesh: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals 2 (SDG2) and 6 (SDG6)," Discussion Papers Series 599, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    10. Hui Ju & Qin Liu & Yingchun Li & Xiaoxu Long & Zhongwei Liu & Erda Lin, 2020. "Multi-Stakeholder Efforts to Adapt to Climate Change in China’s Agricultural Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Syed Ali Asghar Shah & Huixin Wu & Muhammad Fahad Farid & Waqar-Ul-Hassan Tareen & Iftikhar Hussain Badar, 2024. "Climate Trends and Wheat Yield in Punjab, Pakistan: Assessing the Change and Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Kothari, Kritika & Ale, Srinivasulu & Attia, Ahmed & Rajan, Nithya & Xue, Qingwu & Munster, Clyde L., 2019. "Potential climate change adaptation strategies for winter wheat production in the Texas High Plains," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    13. Vinod Phogat & Jirka Šimůnek & Paul Petrie & Tim Pitt & Vilim Filipović, 2023. "Sustainability of a Rainfed Wheat Production System in Relation to Water and Nitrogen Dynamics in the Soil in the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Mohmmed, Alnail & Li, Jianhua & Elaru, Joshua & Elbashier, Mohammed M.A. & Keesstra, Saskia & Artemi, Cerdà & Martin, Kabenge & Reuben, Makomere & Teffera, Zeben, 2018. "Assessing drought vulnerability and adaptation among farmers in Gadaref region, Eastern Sudan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 402-413.
    15. Yang, Lei & Fang, Xiangyang & Zhou, Jie & Zhao, Jie & Hou, Xiqing & Yang, Yadong & Zang, Huadong & Zeng, Zhaohai, 2024. "Optimal irrigation for wheat-maize rotation depending on precipitation in the North China Plain: Evidence from a four-year experiment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6976-:d:1456427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.