IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6300-d1441172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability through Institutional Legitimacy in Police Forces

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio-Juan Briones-Peñalver

    (Departamento Economía de la Empresa, Facultad de Ciencias de la Empresa, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Campus CIM, C/Real, 3, 30201 Cartagena, Spain
    CinTurs, Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability, Universidade do Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal)

  • Ignacio del Olmo Fernandez

    (Jefatura Superior de Policía de la Región de Murcia, Plaza Ceballos 13, 30003 Murcia, Spain)

  • Francisco-José Fernández Cañavate

    (Departamento de Estructuras, Construcción y Expresión Gráfica, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Campus Muralla del Mar, C/Dr. Fleming s/n, 30202 Cartagena, Spain)

  • José António C. Santos

    (CinTurs, Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability, Universidade do Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
    School of Management, Hospitality and Tourism, Universidade do Algarve, 8005-246 Faro, Portugal
    Facultad de Turismo, Universidad de Málaga, 29010 Malaga, Spain)

Abstract

This paper analyses the effect of institutional legitimacy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and sustainability in police forces through their methods and procedures (procedural justice) that determine citizens’ trust in the police, which theoretically influences organised coexistence in human communities (social effectiveness). CSR can increase collective well-being through legitimacy, sustained by police action. An anonymous citizen survey was carried out to verify the theoretical proposal to inquire about their opinions on the legitimacy, methods, and community relations between Spanish police forces and the community. The hypotheses were analysed with a structural equation system. The practical implications aspire to know the citizens’ opinions about the methods and procedures used by the Spanish police and their relations with Spanish civilians. Finally, citizens consider that police actions and procedures are institutionally and legally regulated competencies, and, therefore, citizens cannot influence them.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio-Juan Briones-Peñalver & Ignacio del Olmo Fernandez & Francisco-José Fernández Cañavate & José António C. Santos, 2024. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability through Institutional Legitimacy in Police Forces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6300-:d:1441172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6300/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6300/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Williams & David F. Murphy, 2023. "Learning from Each Other: UK Global Businesses, SMEs, CSR and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Xuelin Bu & Limin Chen, 2023. "From efficiency to legitimacy: the changing logic of internal CSR in emerging multinationals during internationalization," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 1418-1453, September.
    3. Arash Arianpoor & Mahdi Salehi & Fereshteh Daroudi, 2023. "Nonfinancial sustainability reporting, management legitimate authority and enterprise value," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(10), pages 1900-1916, April.
    4. Juan Andres Bernal‐Conesa & Carmen de Nieves Nieto & Antonio Juan Briones‐Peñalver, 2017. "CSR Strategy in Technology Companies: Its Influence on Performance, Competitiveness and Sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 96-107, March.
    5. Shuili Du & Edward Vieira, 2012. "Striving for Legitimacy Through Corporate Social Responsibility: Insights from Oil Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(4), pages 413-427, November.
    6. Ulrich Mueckenberger & Sarah Jastram, 2010. "Transnational Norm-Building Networks and the Legitimacy of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 223-239, December.
    7. Adams, Richard E. & Rohe, William M. & Arcury, Thomas A., 2005. "Awareness of community-oriented policing and neighborhood perceptions in five small to midsize cities," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 43-54.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panicker, Vidya Sukumara & Georgiadou, Elena & Hodgkinson, Ian R., 2024. "Generous to a fault: Differential impact of CSR investments on financial gains in Indian market multinationals," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    2. Ayman Issa & Mohammad A. A. Zaid & Jalal Rajeh Hanaysha, 2022. "Exploring the relationship between female director's profile and sustainability performance: Evidence from the Middle East," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1980-2002, September.
    3. Girardone, Claudia & Kokas, Sotirios & Wood, Geoffrey, 2021. "Diversity and women in finance: Challenges and future perspectives," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Cortez, Maria Céu & Andrade, Nuno & Silva, Florinda, 2022. "The environmental and financial performance of green energy investments: European evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Müllner, Jakob & Puck, Jonas, 2018. "Towards a holistic framework of MNE–state bargaining: A formal model and case-based analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 15-26.
    6. Kirsti Iivonen, 2018. "Defensive Responses to Strategic Sustainability Paradoxes: Have Your Coke and Drink It Too!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 309-327, March.
    7. Veronica Devenin & Constanza Bianchi, 2018. "Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 866-879, September.
    8. Zelong Wei & Hao Shen & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Julie Juan Li, 2017. "How Does Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Matter in a Dysfunctional Institutional Environment? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 209-223, January.
    9. Yuan-Shuh Lii & May-Ching Ding & Chih-Huang Lin, 2018. "Fair or Unfair: The Moderating Effect of Sustainable CSR Practices on Anticipatory Justice Following Service Failure Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & Luis Enrique Valdez-Juárez & José Luis Lizcano-Álvarez, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Intellectual Capital: Sources of Competitiveness and Legitimacy in Organizations’ Management Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-29, October.
    11. Jon Reast & François Maon & Adam Lindgreen & Joëlle Vanhamme, 2013. "Legitimacy-Seeking Organizational Strategies in Controversial Industries: A Case Study Analysis and a Bidimensional Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 139-153, November.
    12. Ana León-Gómez & José Manuel Santos-Jaén & Daniel Ruiz-Palomo & Mercedes Palacios-Manzano, 2022. "Disentangling the impact of ICT adoption on SMEs performance: the mediating roles of corporate social responsibility and innovation," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 831-866, September.
    13. Myoung-Jin Chae, 2021. "Driving Consumer Engagement through Diverse Calls to Action in Corporate Social Responsibility Messages on Social Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Douglas Cumming & Jun Hu & Huiying Wu, 2024. "Leaving a Legacy for my Children: The One-Child Policy Reform and Engagement in CSR Among Family Firms in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 611-632, September.
    15. Pere Mercadé‐Melé & Carmina Fandos‐Herrera & Sofía Velasco‐Gómez, 2021. "How corporate social responsibility influences consumer behavior: An empirical analysis in the Spanish agrifood sector," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 590-611, July.
    16. Heloïse Berkowitz & Marcelo Bucheli & Hervé Dumez, 2017. "Collectively Designing CSR Through Meta-Organizations: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 753-769, July.
    17. Jintao Lu & Licheng Ren & Siqin Yao & Jiayuan Qiao & Wadim Strielkowski & Justas Streimikis, 2019. "Comparative Review of Corporate Social Responsibility of Energy Utilities and Sustainable Energy Development Trends in the Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Sascha Kolaric, 2024. "The impact of climate litigation and activism on stock prices: the case of oil and gas majors," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(11), pages 3141-3172, November.
    19. Chen, Hongtao & Fang, Xiumei & Xiang, Erwei & Ji, Xiaojia & An, Maolin, 2023. "Do online media and investor attention affect corporate environmental information disclosure？Evidence from Chinese listed companies," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1022-1040.
    20. Eugene Kang & Nguyen Bao Lam, 2023. "The impact of environmental disclosure on initial public offering underpricing: Sustainable development in Singapore," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 119-133, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6300-:d:1441172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.