IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6132-d1437545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Management of Physical Assets Supported by Maintenance Performance Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Renan Favarão da Silva

    (Production Engineering Department, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Arthur Henrique de Andrade Melani

    (Department of Mechatronics and Mechanical Systems Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Miguel Angelo de Carvalho Michalski

    (Department of Mechatronics and Mechanical Systems Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza

    (Department of Mechatronics and Mechanical Systems Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Silvio Ikuyo Nabeta

    (Department of Electrical Power and Automation Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

Abstract

Many asset-intensive organizations implement risk management strategies to mitigate potential hazards associated with physical asset failures, such as infrastructure deterioration or mechanical breakdown. As these physical assets’ risks can be treated with maintenance activities, properly evaluating the performance of maintenance management is of interest for risk management. Accordingly, this paper proposes a framework for the determination of Maintenance Performance Indicators (MPIs) to support the risk management of physical assets. The proposed framework included four main processes: Integrate performance evaluation guidelines, Review the maintenance management strategy, Define the performance indicators, and Assess maintenance across the MPIs. The ISO 55000 series for asset management and the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) approach were the guidelines considered. The ISO 55001 standard provides three assessment domains for performance evaluation: asset portfolio, asset management, and asset management system. The BSC approach identifies four performance evaluation perspectives that were integrated to address the requirements of one of these asset management domains. Then, the MPIs were defined for each of the performance evaluation domains in line with the maintenance management strategy toward the risk management of physical assets. Through a case study, the proposed framework was demonstrated considering the operational context of a Brazilian hydroelectric power plant. As a result, the proposed framework was shown to be consistent in systematically determining the MPIs that support risk management in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Renan Favarão da Silva & Arthur Henrique de Andrade Melani & Miguel Angelo de Carvalho Michalski & Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza & Silvio Ikuyo Nabeta, 2024. "Risk Management of Physical Assets Supported by Maintenance Performance Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6132-:d:1437545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caropul Mendes & Hugo Raposo & Ricardo Ferraz & José Torres Farinha, 2023. "The Economic Management of Physical Assets: The Practical Case of an Urban Passenger Transport Company in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Lueg, Rainer & Vu, Louisa, 2015. "Success factors in Balanced Scorecard implementations – A literature review," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 26(4), pages 306-327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jitender Kumar & Neha Prince & H. Kent Baker, 2022. "Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Issues," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 11(2), pages 147-161, June.
    2. Ceren Peri Cignitas & Juan Antonio Torrents Arevalo & Jordi Vilajosana Crusells, 2023. "Literature Review on the Effect of Balanced Scorecard on Employee Wellbeing," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(3), pages 103-103, February.
    3. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2021. "Determinants of successful adoption of the Balanced Scorecard in Vietnamese small and medium-sized enterprises," OSF Preprints 5hx2r, Center for Open Science.
    4. Kefe Irem, 2019. "The Determination of Performance Measures by Using a Balanced Scorecard Framework," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 43-56, March.
    5. Jannika Kutzschbach & Parvina Tanikulova & Rainer Lueg, 2021. "The Role of Top Managers in Implementing Corporate Sustainability—A Systematic Literature Review on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6132-:d:1437545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.