IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p5260-d1418936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalized-Norm-Based Robustness Evaluation Model of Bus Network under Snowy Weather

Author

Listed:
  • Yadan Yan

    (School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Bohui Su

    (School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Zhiju Chen

    (School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

Abstract

Global climate change leads to frequent extreme snowfall weather, which has a significant impact on the safety and operating efficiency of urban public transportation. In order to cope with the adverse effects of extreme weather, governments should vigorously develop sustainable transportation. Since urban public transportation is a critical component of building a sustainable city, traffic management departments should quantitatively analyze the performance changes of the urban public transportation network under extreme weather conditions. Therefore, fully considering the comprehensive effects of network performance and topology to improve the robustness of urban public transportation systems requires more attention. The urban public transport network with high robustness can achieve fewer recovery costs, lower additional bus scheduling costs, and achieve the sustainable development of the public transport network. Considering the impact of travelers’ travel time tolerance and in-vehicle space congestion tolerance under snowy conditions, this paper proposes a generalized-norm-based robustness evaluation model of the bus network. Example analyses are conducted using checkerboard and ring-radial topological network structures to verify the applicability of the proposed model. The results show the following: (1) In an extreme snowfall scenario, the robustness of checkerboard and ring-radiating bus networks is reduced by 38% and 39%, respectively. (2) In the checkerboard network, the central area units are always more important to the system robustness than the peripheral units, while, in the ring-radial network, the units with higher importance are all in the ring line. (3) The failure of Ring Line 5 has a great impact on both the checkerboard and ring-radial networks, causing the system robustness to decrease by 43% and 50%, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Yadan Yan & Bohui Su & Zhiju Chen, 2024. "Generalized-Norm-Based Robustness Evaluation Model of Bus Network under Snowy Weather," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5260-:d:1418936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5260/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5260/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Derrible, Sybil & Kennedy, Christopher, 2010. "The complexity and robustness of metro networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(17), pages 3678-3691.
    2. Yingying Xing & Jian Lu & Shengdi Chen & Sunanda Dissanayake, 2017. "Vulnerability analysis of urban rail transit based on complex network theory: a case study of Shanghai Metro," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 501-525, October.
    3. Hatem Abdelaty & Ahmed Foda & Moataz Mohamed, 2023. "The Robustness of Battery Electric Bus Transit Networks under Charging Infrastructure Disruptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Cats, O., 2016. "The robustness value of public transport development plans," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 236-246.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noguchi, Hiroki & Fuse, Masaaki, 2020. "Rethinking critical node problem for railway networks from the perspective of turn-back operation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 558(C).
    2. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2018. "How urban density, network topology and socio-economy influence public transport ridership: Empirical evidence from 48 European metropolitan areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 50-63.
    3. Hu, Xinlei & Huang, Jie & Shi, Feng, 2022. "A robustness assessment with passenger flow data of high-speed rail network in China," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    4. Xiaohong Yin & Jiakun Wu, 2022. "Simulation Study on Topology Characteristics and Cascading Failure of Hefei Subway Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Zhu, Weihua & Liu, Kai & Wang, Ming & Yan, Xiaoyong, 2018. "Enhancing robustness of metro networks using strategic defense," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 1081-1091.
    6. Cats, Oded & Koppenol, Gert-Jaap & Warnier, Martijn, 2017. "Robustness assessment of link capacity reduction for complex networks: Application for public transport systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 544-553.
    7. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    8. Cats, Oded & Krishnakumari, Panchamy, 2020. "Metropolitan rail network robustness," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 549(C).
    9. Jiangang Shi & Shiping Wen & Xianbo Zhao & Guangdong Wu, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Vulnerability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Hong, Liu & Zhong, Xin & Ouyang, Min & Tian, Hui & He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis of public transit systems from the perspective of urban residential communities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 143-156.
    11. Annunziata Esposito Amideo & Stefano Starita & Maria Paola Scaparra, 2019. "Assessing Protection Strategies for Urban Rail Transit Systems: A Case-Study on the Central London Underground," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Liping Ge & Stefan Voß & Lin Xie, 2022. "Robustness and disturbances in public transport," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 191-261, March.
    13. Luo, Ding & Cats, Oded & van Lint, Hans & Currie, Graham, 2019. "Integrating network science and public transport accessibility analysis for comparative assessment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. Zhiru Wang & Wubin Ma & Albert Chan, 2020. "Exploring the Relationships between the Topological Characteristics of Subway Networks and Service Disruption Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Chan, Ho-Yin & Chen, Anthony & Li, Guoyuan & Xu, Xiangdong & Lam, William, 2021. "Evaluating the value of new metro lines using route diversity measures: The case of Hong Kong's Mass Transit Railway system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Kai Lu & Tao Tang & Chunhai Gao, 2020. "The Depth-First Optimal Strategy Path Generation Algorithm for Passengers in a Metro Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Jing Liu & Huapu Lu & Mingyu Chen & Jianyu Wang & Ying Zhang, 2020. "Macro Perspective Research on Transportation Safety: An Empirical Analysis of Network Characteristics and Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Xueguo Xu & Chen Xu & Wenxin Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Destruction Resistance of Giant Urban Rail Transit Network from the Perspective of Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    19. Laure Rousset & César Ducruet, 2020. "Disruptions in Spatial Networks: a Comparative Study of Major Shocks Affecting Ports and Shipping Patterns," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 423-447, June.
    20. Mo, Baichuan & Koutsopoulos, Haris N. & Zhao, Jinhua, 2022. "Inferring passenger responses to urban rail disruptions using smart card data: A probabilistic framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5260-:d:1418936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.