IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4497-d1402071.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intentionality and Decision-Making in Impact Investing—Understanding Investment Motivation and Selection Criteria of Impact Investors

Author

Listed:
  • David C. Heinz

    (Chair of Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, 04109 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Vivek K. Velamuri

    (Chair of Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, 04109 Leipzig, Germany)

Abstract

The opacity of the impact investment decision-making process is one of the main constraints hampering further growth in the impact investing ecosystem. This paper takes a differentiated view on why (investment motivation) and how (investment decision criteria) the major private impact investor types allocate funding to investees. We incorporate insights from 34 interviews with the five major impact investor types: social business angels, foundations, social banks, impact investment funds, and crowdvesting platforms. We find that motivation and decision-making significantly differ between the impact investor types, especially concerning strict vs. ambiguous impact definitions, active vs. passive investment approaches, and return requirements reaching from capital preservation to market-driven returns. By providing a differentiated overview of the investor type-specific motivations and most important investment criteria, our study offers social entrepreneurs a roadmap to identify the most appropriate impact investors for their business model.

Suggested Citation

  • David C. Heinz & Vivek K. Velamuri, 2024. "Intentionality and Decision-Making in Impact Investing—Understanding Investment Motivation and Selection Criteria of Impact Investors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4497-:d:1402071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4497/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4497/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Roundy & Hunter Holzhauer & Ye Dai, 2017. "Finance or philanthropy? Exploring the motivations and criteria of impact investors," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 491-512, August.
    2. Kathleen Krause & Dirk Battenfeld, 2019. "Coming Out of the Niche? Social Banking in Germany: An Empirical Analysis of Consumer Characteristics and Market Size," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 889-911, March.
    3. Elisabeth Paulet & Miia Parnaudeau & Francesc Relano, 2015. "Banking with Ethics: Strategic Moves and Structural Changes of the Banking Industry in the Aftermath of the Subprime Mortgage Crisis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 199-207, September.
    4. Othmar M. Lehner & Alex Nicholls, 2014. "Social finance and crowdfunding for social enterprises: a public-private case study providing legitimacy and leverage," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 271-286, July.
    5. Vincenzo Butticè & Massimo G. Colombo & Mike Wright, 2017. "Serial Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and Project Success," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(2), pages 183-207, March.
    6. Simon Cornée & Ariane Szafarz, 2014. "Vive la Différence: Social Banks and Reciprocity in the Credit Market," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(3), pages 361-380, December.
    7. James Austin & Howard Stevenson & Jane Wei–Skillern, 2006. "Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(1), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Anne Barraquier, 2013. "A Group Identity Analysis of Organizations and Their Stakeholders: Porosity of Identity and Mobility of Attributes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 45-62, June.
    9. Dariya Mykhayliv & Klaus G Zauner, 2018. "The financial and economic performance of social banks," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(34-35), pages 3833-3839, July.
    10. Guillermo Casasnovas & Jessica Jones, 2022. "Who Has a Seat at the Table in Impact Investing? Addressing Inequality by Giving Voice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 951-969, September.
    11. Matthew Lee & Arzi Adbi & Jasjit Singh, 2020. "Categorical cognition and outcome efficiency in impact investing decisions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 86-107, January.
    12. Susan D. Phillips & Bernadette Johnson, 2021. "Inching to Impact: The Demand Side of Social Impact Investing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 615-629, January.
    13. Philip T. Roundy, 2019. "Regional differences in impact investment: a theory of impact investing ecosystems," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(4), pages 467-485, June.
    14. Kai Hockerts, 2017. "Determinants of Social Entrepreneurial Intentions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(1), pages 105-130, January.
    15. Alex Nicholls, 2010. "The Legitimacy of Social Entrepreneurship: Reflexive Isomorphism in a Pre–Paradigmatic Field," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 611-633, July.
    16. Johanna Mair & Julie Battilana & Julian Cardenas, 2012. "Organizing for Society: A Typology of Social Entrepreneuring Models," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 353-373, December.
    17. Othmar M. Lehner, 2013. "Crowdfunding social ventures: a model and research agenda," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 289-311, October.
    18. Francesco Di Lorenzo & Mariarosa Scarlata, 2019. "Social Enterprises, Venture Philanthropy and the Alleviation of Income Inequality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 307-323, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon Cornée & Panu Kalmi & Ariane Szafarz, 2020. "The Business Model of Social Banks," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 196-226, May.
    2. Syrus M. Islam, 2022. "Impact investing in social sector organisations: a systematic review and research agenda," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 709-737, March.
    3. Annebeth Roor & Karen Maas, 2024. "Do impact investors live up to their promise? A systematic literature review on (im)proving investments' impacts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3707-3732, May.
    4. Simon Cornée & Anastasia Cozarenco & Ariane Szafarz, 2023. "The Changing Role of Banks in the Financial System: Social Versus Conventional Banks," Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions, in: Chrysovalantis Gaganis & Fotios Pasiouras & Menelaos Tasiou & Constantin Zopounidis (ed.), Sustainable Finance and ESG, pages 1-25, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Cojoianu, Theodor F. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Lin, Yanan, 2022. "Private market impact investing firms: Ownership structure and investment style," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    6. Adélie Ranville & Marcos Barros, 2022. "Towards Normative Theories of Social Entrepreneurship. A Review of the Top Publications of the Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 407-438, October.
    7. Stefano Cosma & Alessandro G. Grasso & Francesco Pagliacci & Alessia Pedrazzoli, 2018. "Is Equity Crowdfunding a Good Tool for Social Enterprises?," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 18022, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    8. Gupta, Parul & Chauhan, Sumedha & Paul, Justin & Jaiswal, M.P., 2020. "Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 209-229.
    9. Irene Bengo & Alice Borrello & Veronica Chiodo, 2021. "Preserving the Integrity of Social Impact Investing: Towards a Distinctive Implementation Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Vladasel, Theodor & Parker, Simon C. & Sloof, Randolph & van Praag, Mirjam C., 2022. "Revenue Drift, Incentives, and Effort Allocation in Social Enterprises," IZA Discussion Papers 15716, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Stefano Cosma & Alessandro G. Grasso & Francesco Pagliacci & Alessia Pedrazzoli, 2018. "Is Equity Crowdfunding a Good Tool for Social Enterprises?," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 0067, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    12. Anirudh Agrawal & Kai Hockerts, 2019. "Impact Investing Strategy: Managing Conflicts between Impact Investor and Investee Social Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Choi, Nia & Majumdar, Satyajit, 2014. "Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 363-376.
    14. Syrus M Islam, 2022. "Social impact scaling strategies in social enterprises: A systematic review and research agenda," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 47(2), pages 298-321, May.
    15. Hadar Gafni & Marek Hudon & Anaïs Périlleux, 2021. "Business or Basic Needs? The Impact of Loan Purpose on Social Crowdfunding Platforms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 777-793, November.
    16. Laura Toschi & Elisa Ughetto & Andrea Fronzetti Colladon, 2023. "The identity of social impact venture capitalists: exploring social linguistic positioning and linguistic distinctiveness through text mining," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 1249-1280, March.
    17. Karin Kurata & Shuto Miyashita & Shintaro Sengoku & Kota Kodama & Yeong Joo Lim, 2023. "A Comparative Analysis of Social Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurship: An Examination of International Co-Authorship Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    18. EuiBeom Jeong & Hanna Yoo, 2022. "A systematic literature review of women in social entrepreneurship," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(4), pages 935-970, December.
    19. Zineb Aouni & Marek Hudon & Anaïs A Périlleux & Tyler Wry, 2024. "Crowdfunding social ventures: who rewards (or punishes) hybridity?," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/367191, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Zineb Aouni & Marek Hudon & Anaïs A Périlleux & Tyler Wry, 2024. "Crowdfunding social ventures: Who will reward (or punish) hybridity?," Working Papers CEB 24-004, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4497-:d:1402071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.