IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6873-d1127338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tool for Assessment of the Green Technology Transfer Structure in Brazilian Public Universities

Author

Listed:
  • Luan Carlos Santos Silva

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Federal University of Grande Dourados (UFGD), Dourados 79825-070, Brazil
    Department of Production Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90010-150, Brazil)

  • Carla Schwengber Ten Caten

    (Department of Production Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90010-150, Brazil)

  • Silvia Gaia

    (Department of Production Engineering, Federal University of Technology—Paraná (UTFPR), Ponta Grossa 84017-220, Brazil)

  • Rodrigo de Oliveira Souza

    (Department of Production Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90010-150, Brazil)

Abstract

Green technologies have assumed an important role in combating global climate change. The process of transferring environmentally sustainable technologies from universities is crucial to mitigate climate change and for promoting sustainable development. This study aims to propose a tool to evaluate the transfer structure of the green technologies that are generated within universities. The tool has the purpose of supporting managers in the dissemination and absorption of these technologies in the market. The research methodology is established as applied and exploratory, with a quantitative approach. To analyze and validate the developed tool, a diagnosis was conducted in the Brazilian scenario. The research identified 255 groups registered in universities that develop research in green areas. To analyze the information collected in the Green Technology Transfer Radar survey, Pearson’s linear correlation coefficients between the dimensions were checked, followed by multivariate statistical techniques and factor analysis. The factor extraction method considered was that of principal components, and factor rotation was performed using the varimax orthogonal method with Kaiser’s criterion. As results were obtained, the evaluation tool contains eleven dimensions (People, Process, Budget, Relationship, Integrated Management, Research, and Development “R&D” in Green Technologies, Intellectual Property, Valuation, Commercialization, Environment, and Society) and seven stages for operationalizing the tool. The results revealed gaps in the transfer process, and universities should develop strategies to reduce the gaps pointed out in the application of the tool. Additionally, joint action with the TTOs and research groups within their institutions is necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Luan Carlos Santos Silva & Carla Schwengber Ten Caten & Silvia Gaia & Rodrigo de Oliveira Souza, 2023. "Tool for Assessment of the Green Technology Transfer Structure in Brazilian Public Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6873-:d:1127338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6873/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6873/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. B. Radin Firdaus & Osman Mohamad & Taufik Mohammad & Mahinda Senevi Gunaratne, 2020. "Community Partnership Through Knowledge Transfer Program: Assessment From the Perspectives of Academics’ Experience," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    2. Corine Genet & Khalid Errabi & Caroline Gauthier, 2012. "Which Model of Technology Transfer for Nanotechnology? A Comparison with Biotech and Microelectronics," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00749152, HAL.
    3. Sedaitis, Judith, 2000. "Technology transfer in transitional economies: a test of market, state and organizational models," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 135-147, February.
    4. Amesse, Fernand & Cohendet, P., 2001. "Technology transfer revisited from the perspective of the knowledge-based economy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1459-1478, December.
    5. Lisa Craiut & Constantin Bungau & Tudor Bungau & Cristian Grava & Pavel Otrisal & Andrei-Flavius Radu, 2022. "Technology Transfer, Sustainability, and Development, Worldwide and in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-33, November.
    6. Tanut Waroonkun & Rodney Stewart, 2008. "Modeling the international technology transfer process in construction projects: evidence from Thailand," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 667-687, December.
    7. Todo, Yasuyuki, 2003. "Empirically consistent scale effects: An endogenous growth model with technology transfer to developing countries," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 25-46, March.
    8. Bozeman, Barry, 2000. "Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 627-655, April.
    9. Yanyi Huang & Xiu-Hao Ding & Ruihong Liu & Yuanqiong He & Suming Wu, 2019. "Reviewing the Domain of Technology and Innovation Management: A Visualizing Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    10. Shengzhong Zhang & Yingmin Yu & Qihong Zhu & Chun Martin Qiu & Aixuan Tian, 2020. "Green Innovation Mode under Carbon Tax and Innovation Subsidy: An Evolutionary Game Analysis for Portfolio Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Rolando-Arturo Cubillos-González & Grace Tiberio Cardoso, 2020. "Clean Technology Transfer and Innovation in Social Housing Production in Brazil and Colombia. A Framework from a Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, February.
    12. Harmon, Brian & Ardishvili, Alexander & Cardozo, Richard & Elder, Tait & Leuthold, John & Parshall, John & Raghian, Michael & Smith, Donald, 1997. "Mapping the university technology transfer process," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 423-434, November.
    13. Charbel EL AMMAR & Constantin Marius PROFIROIU, 2020. "Innovation In Public Administration Reform: A Strategic Reform Through Npm, Ict, And E-Governance. A Comparative Analysis Between Lebanon And Romania," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(35), pages 75-89, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Armenia Androniceanu & Cristina Veith & Ștefan Alexandru Ionescu & Paul Marinescu & Alexandra Georgiana Sima & Alexandru Paru, 2024. "Shaping Sustainable Futures: Public Policies and Renewable Energy Insights Based on Global Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silva, Luan Carlos Santos & Ten Caten, Carla Schwengber & Gaia, Silvia, 2023. "Conceptual framework of green technology transfer at public university scope Brazilian," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(4).
    2. Lichtenthaler, Ulrich, 2008. "Externally commercializing technology assets: An examination of different process stages," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 445-464, July.
    3. Bradley, Samantha R. & Hayter, Christopher S. & Link, Albert N., 2013. "Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer," UNCG Economics Working Papers 13-10, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics.
    4. Véronique Schaeffer & Sıla Öcalan-Özel & Julien Pénin, 2020. "The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: a longitudinal approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 31-55, February.
    5. James A. Cunningham & Paul O’Reilly, 2018. "Macro, meso and micro perspectives of technology transfer," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 545-557, June.
    6. Leischnig, Alexander & Geigenmueller, Anja & Lohmann, Stefanie, 2014. "On the role of alliance management capability, organizational compatibility, and interaction quality in interorganizational technology transfer," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1049-1057.
    7. Lai, Wen-Hsiang, 2011. "Willingness-to-engage in technology transfer in industry–university collaborations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(11), pages 1218-1223.
    8. Helene-Marie Stander & Jennifer L. Broadhurst, 2021. "Understanding the Opportunities, Barriers, and Enablers for the Commercialization and Transfer of Technologies for Mine Waste Valorization: A Case Study of Coal Processing Wastes in South Africa," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Heeyong Noh & Sungjoo Lee, 2019. "Where technology transfer research originated and where it is going: a quantitative analysis of literature published between 1980 and 2015," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 700-740, June.
    10. Djordje Djokovic & Vangelis Souitaris, 2008. "Spinouts from academic institutions: a literature review with suggestions for further research," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 225-247, June.
    11. Joachim Heinzl & Ah-Lian Kor & Graham Orange & Hans Kaufmann, 2013. "Technology transfer model for Austrian higher education institutions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 38(5), pages 607-640, October.
    12. Ileana Palaco & Suk Kyoung Kim & Min Jae Park & Jae Jeung Rho, 2022. "Exploring capabilities of international technology transfer intermediaries between emerging and developed countries," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 307-352, February.
    13. Juan Jesus Arenas & Domingo González, 2018. "Technology Transfer Models and Elements in the University-Industry Collaboration," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, June.
    14. K. Chandrashekhar Iyer & Partha S. Banerjee, 2018. "Facilitators and inhibitors in sector wide technology transfer projects in developing economies: an empirical study," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 172-197, February.
    15. Ho, Yuen-Ping & Ruan, Yi & Hang, Chang-Chieh & Wong, Poh-Kam, 2016. "Technology upgrading of Small-and-Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) through a manpower secondment strategy – A mixed-methods study of Singapore's T-Up program," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 57, pages 21-29.
    16. Lisa Craiut & Constantin Bungau & Tudor Bungau & Cristian Grava & Pavel Otrisal & Andrei-Flavius Radu, 2022. "Technology Transfer, Sustainability, and Development, Worldwide and in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-33, November.
    17. Yuandi Wang & Die Hu & Weiping Li & Yiwei Li & Qiang Li, 2015. "Collaboration strategies and effects on university research: evidence from Chinese universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 725-749, May.
    18. Narayanan, V.K. & Yang, Yi & Zahra, Shaker A., 2009. "Corporate venturing and value creation: A review and proposed framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 58-76, February.
    19. Lichtenthaler, Ulrich & Ernst, Holger, 2007. "Developing reputation to overcome the imperfections in the markets for knowledge," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 37-55, February.
    20. James A. Cunningham & Matthias Menter & Chris Young, 2017. "A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 923-956, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6873-:d:1127338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.