IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p5912-d1110321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the Safe Distance for Mining Equipment Operation When Forming an Internal Dump in a Deep Open Pit

Author

Listed:
  • Oleg Bazaluk

    (Belt and Road Initiative Institute for Chinese-European Studies (BRIICES), Guangdong University of Petro-Chemical Technology, Maoming 525000, China)

  • Oleh Anisimov

    (Department of Surface Mining, Dnipro University of Technology, 49005 Dnipro, Ukraine)

  • Pavlo Saik

    (Department of Mining Engineering and Education, Dnipro University of Technology, 49005 Dnipro, Ukraine)

  • Vasyl Lozynskyi

    (Department of Mining Engineering and Education, Dnipro University of Technology, 49005 Dnipro, Ukraine)

  • Oleksandr Akimov

    (Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, 03039 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Leonid Hrytsenko

    (Department of Surface Mining, Dnipro University of Technology, 49005 Dnipro, Ukraine)

Abstract

In the surface mining of mineral deposits, land resources suitable for agricultural purposes are inappropriately spent in large volumes. When mining deep open pits, overburden rocks are mainly transported to the surface. The optimal solution for reducing the area of disturbed lands is the placement of overburden rocks in internal dumps in the open pit. This is especially suitable when mining a mineral deposit with several open pits where at least one of them is depleted. Therefore, it is important to assess the feasibility of building an internal dump, based on the stability parameters of its slopes and the safe distance for placing mining equipment within its boundaries, which was the focus of this research. Numerical modeling with Slide 5.0 software was used to determine the stability of the dump slope inside the open pit and the safe distance from the upper slope edge for placing mining equipment. This reflected the geomechanical situation occurring within the boundaries of the dump formed in the open-pit field with a high degree of reliability. It was determined that the maximum standard safety factor values of the open-pit slopes are within the limits when the overburden rocks border on the hard bedrock ( Ks.s.f ≥ 1.2). Under the condition where the dump slope bordered on sedimentations represented by clays, loams, and sands with a strength of 2–3 on the Mohs scale, the safety factor decreased by 22%. It was determined that the minimum safe distance from the outer contour of the dragline base to the upper edge of a single-tier dump was 15.5 m with a safety factor of 1.21. The maximum safe distance values in the range of 73.5–93 m were concentrated within the boundaries of sections 5–9, with a safety factor from 1.18 to 1.28. When the dragline was located within the boundaries of section 7, the dump construction works should be conducted only if the dump exist for up to 3 years. Based on the identified parameters, on the example of using the ESH-11/70 walking dragline, a technological scheme of its operation was developed with the allocation of safe boundaries for its placement when forming an internal dump. The results obtained are useful for the development of projects for the reclamation of depleted open pits.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleg Bazaluk & Oleh Anisimov & Pavlo Saik & Vasyl Lozynskyi & Oleksandr Akimov & Leonid Hrytsenko, 2023. "Determining the Safe Distance for Mining Equipment Operation When Forming an Internal Dump in a Deep Open Pit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5912-:d:1110321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5912/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5912/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margarita Ignatyeva & Vera Yurak & Natalia Pustokhina, 2020. "Recultivation of Post-Mining Disturbed Land: Review of Content and Comparative Law and Feasibility Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Michał Patyk & Przemysław Bodziony & Zbigniew Krysa, 2021. "A Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method to Weight the Sustainability Criteria of Equipment Selection for Surface Mining," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Oleg Bazaluk & Mykhailo Petlovanyi & Vasyl Lozynskyi & Serhii Zubko & Kateryna Sai & Pavlo Saik, 2021. "Sustainable Underground Iron Ore Mining in Ukraine with Backfilling Worked-Out Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Oleg Bazaluk & Ivan Sadovenko & Alina Zahrytsenko & Pavlo Saik & Vasyl Lozynskyi & Roman Dychkovskyi, 2021. "Forecasting Underground Water Dynamics within the Technogenic Environment of a Mine Field. Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heydari, Mehrnoosh & Osanloo, Morteza, 2024. "Untangling the complex web of environmental, social, and economic impacts in deep and large-scale open-pit mining projects using a dynamic modeling framework," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Pavlo Saik & Oleksii Cherniaiev & Oleh Anisimov & Kanay Rysbekov, 2023. "Substantiation of the Direction for Mining Operations That Develop under Conditions of Shear Processes Caused by Hydrostatic Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oleg Bazaluk & Ivan Sadovenko & Alina Zahrytsenko & Pavlo Saik & Vasyl Lozynskyi & Roman Dychkovskyi, 2021. "Forecasting Underground Water Dynamics within the Technogenic Environment of a Mine Field. Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Dawid Szurgacz & Beata Borska & Sergey Zhironkin & Ryszard Diederichs & Anthony J. S. Spearing, 2022. "Optimization of the Load Capacity System of Powered Roof Support: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Dawid Szurgacz & Beata Borska & Ryszard Diederichs & Anthony J. S. Spearing & Sergey Zhironkin, 2023. "Minimizing Internal Leaks of a Powered Roof Support’s Hydraulic Prop Based on Double Block with Charging," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Dawid Szurgacz & Sergey Zhironkin & Jiří Pokorný & A. J. S. (Sam) Spearing & Stefan Vöth & Michal Cehlár & Izabela Kowalewska, 2021. "Development of an Active Training Method for Belt Conveyor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Aneta Kowalska & Bal Ram Singh & Anna Grobelak, 2022. "Carbon Footprint for Post-Mining Soils: The Dynamic of Net CO 2 Fluxes and SOC Sequestration at Different Soil Remediation Stages under Reforestation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Thobeka Pearl Makhathini & Joseph Kapuku Bwapwa & Sphesihle Mtsweni, 2023. "Various Options for Mining and Metallurgical Waste in the Circular Economy: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Oleg Bazaluk & Kateryna Sai & Vasyl Lozynskyi & Mykhailo Petlovanyi & Pavlo Saik, 2021. "Research into Dissociation Zones of Gas Hydrate Deposits with a Heterogeneous Structure in the Black Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Zbigniew Krysa & Przemysław Bodziony & Michał Patyk, 2021. "Discrete Simulations in Analyzing the Effectiveness of Raw Materials Transportation during Extraction of Low-Quality Deposits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Michał Patyk & Przemysław Bodziony, 2022. "Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process to Select the Most Appropriate Mining Equipment for the Exploitation of Secondary Deposits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Sergey Zhironkin & Dawid Szurgacz, 2022. "Mining Technologies Innovative Development: Industrial, Environmental and Economic Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-5, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5912-:d:1110321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.