IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v80y2017icp756-764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimising biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and organic fraction of municipal solid waste

Author

Listed:
  • Matheri, A.N.
  • Ndiweni, S.N.
  • Belaid, M.
  • Muzenda, E.
  • Hubert, R.

Abstract

In this study, it was observed that in experimental work under laboratory scale using conventional biochemical methane potential (BMP) assay, the loading rate ratio 4:1 had optimum biodegradability rate than other ratios which were investigated, while the loading rate ratio of 1:1 had optimum biogas and methane yield after 15 days hydraulic retention time. It was concluded that chicken waste (CM) mono-digestion has higher biodegradability rate compare to organic fraction municipality solid waste (OFMSW) mono-digestion. Co-digestion of OFMSW and CM stabilizes conditions in digestion process such as carbon to nitrogen (C:N) ratio in the substrate mixtures as well as macro and micronutrients, pH, inhibitors or toxic compounds, dry matter and thus increasing biogas production. It was concluded that the organic waste generated in the municipal landfills could be co-digested with CM to produce methane which can be used as a source of environmentally friendly and clean energy for the transport sector, industries and residential homes.

Suggested Citation

  • Matheri, A.N. & Ndiweni, S.N. & Belaid, M. & Muzenda, E. & Hubert, R., 2017. "Optimising biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 756-764.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:80:y:2017:i:c:p:756-764
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117307049
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Florides, Georgios & Tassou, Savvas A., 2014. "A review of simple to scientific models for anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 701-714.
    2. Hilkiah Igoni, A. & Ayotamuno, M.J. & Eze, C.L. & Ogaji, S.O.T. & Probert, S.D., 2008. "Designs of anaerobic digesters for producing biogas from municipal solid-waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(6), pages 430-438, June.
    3. Dangoggo, S.M. & Aliyu, M. & Atiku, A.T., 1996. "The effect of seeding with bacteria on biogas production rate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 1045-1048.
    4. Abbasi, Tasneem & Tauseef, S.M. & Abbasi, S.A., 2012. "Anaerobic digestion for global warming control and energy generation—An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3228-3242.
    5. Sambo, A.S. & Garba, B. & Danshehu, B.G., 1995. "Effect of some operating parameters on biogas production rate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 343-344.
    6. Cuce, Erdem & Harjunowibowo, Dewanto & Cuce, Pinar Mert, 2016. "Renewable and sustainable energy saving strategies for greenhouse systems: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 34-59.
    7. Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Behera, Bhagirath & Ali, Akhter, 2017. "Factors determining household use of clean and renewable energy sources for lighting in Sub-Saharan Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 661-672.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. KeChrist Obileke & Golden Makaka & Nwabunwanne Nwokolo, 2022. "Efficient Methane Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Cow Dung: An Optimization Approach," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Huayong Zhang & Di An & Yudong Cao & Yonglan Tian & Jinxian He, 2021. "Modeling the Methane Production Kinetics of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Agricultural Wastes Using Sigmoidal Functions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Cimmino, Luca & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2024. "A solar-assisted liquefied biomethane production by anaerobic digestion: Dynamic simulations for harbors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    4. Muyiwa Lawrence Adedara & Ridwan Taiwo & Hans-Rudolf Bork, 2023. "Municipal Solid Waste Collection and Coverage Rates in Sub-Saharan African Countries: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Rafiee, Shahin & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Lindeneg, Susanne & Angelidaki, Irini, 2020. "Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorizing municipal solid waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, lactic and succinic acid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Essam M. Abdelsalam & Mohamed Samer & Mariam A. Amer & Baher M. A. Amer, 2021. "Biogas production using dry fermentation technology through co-digestion of manure and agricultural wastes," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 8746-8757, June.
    7. Izabela Konkol & Lesław Świerczek & Adam Cenian, 2023. "Chicken Manure Pretreatment for Enhancing Biogas and Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Jiang, Y. & Xie, S.H. & Dennehy, C. & Lawlor, P.G. & Hu, Z.H. & Wu, G.X. & Zhan, X.M. & Gardiner, G.E., 2020. "Inactivation of pathogens in anaerobic digestion systems for converting biowastes to bioenergy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    9. Fuchs, Werner & Wang, Xuemei & Gabauer, Wolfgang & Ortner, Markus & Li, Zifu, 2018. "Tackling ammonia inhibition for efficient biogas production from chicken manure: Status and technical trends in Europe and China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 186-199.
    10. Kasinath, Archana & Fudala-Ksiazek, Sylwia & Szopinska, Malgorzata & Bylinski, Hubert & Artichowicz, Wojciech & Remiszewska-Skwarek, Anna & Luczkiewicz, Aneta, 2021. "Biomass in biogas production: Pretreatment and codigestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    11. Gürel Soyer & Ersel Yilmaz, 2020. "Waste Management in Dairy Cattle Farms in Aydın Region. Potential of Energy Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    12. Navodita Bhatnagar & David Ryan & Richard Murphy & Anne-Marie Enright, 2020. "Trace Element Supplementation and Enzyme Addition to Enhance Biogas Production by Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Litter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Dehkordi, Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Noorbakhsh & Jahromi, Ahmad Reza Taghipour & Ferdowsi, Ali & Shumal, Mohammad & Dehnavi, Ali, 2020. "Investigation of biogas production potential from mechanical separated municipal solid waste as an approach for developing countries (case study: Isfahan-Iran)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Zhou, Man & Li, Cheng & Ni, Fuquan & Chen, Anjun & Li, Meiliang & Shen, Guanghui & Deng, Yu & Deng, Liangwei, 2022. "Packed activated carbon particles triggered a more robust syntrophic pathway for acetate oxidation-hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis at extremely high ammonia concentrations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 305-317.
    15. Na Duan & Xia Ran & Ruirui Li & Panagiotis G. Kougias & Yuanhui Zhang & Cong Lin & Hongbin Liu, 2018. "Performance Evaluation of Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure with Algal Digestate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, July.
    16. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 2: Mainstream and downstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1392-1407.
    17. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Chen, Yichao & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wan, Liping & Li, Dong, 2021. "The screening of early warning indicators and microbial community of chicken manure thermophilic digestion at high organic loading rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    18. M. Devendran Manogaran & Mohd Hakimi & Mohammad Harith Nizam Basheer Ahmad & Rashid Shamsuddin & Jun Wei Lim & Muzamil Abdalla M Hassan & Nurul Tasnim Sahrin, 2023. "Effect of Temperature on Co-Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure and Empty Fruit Bunch: A Kinetic Parametric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-11, March.
    19. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giwa, Adewale & Alabi, Adetunji & Yusuf, Ahmed & Olukan, Tuza, 2017. "A comprehensive review on biomass and solar energy for sustainable energy generation in Nigeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 620-641.
    2. Cudjoe, Dan & Wang, Hong & zhu, Bangzhu, 2022. "Thermochemical treatment of daily COVID-19 single-use facemask waste: Power generation potential and environmental impact analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    3. Pöschl, Martina & Ward, Shane & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3305-3321, November.
    4. Ge, Quanwu & Ke, Zhixin & Liu, Yutong & Chai, Fu & Yang, Wenhua & Zhang, Zhili & Wang, Yang, 2023. "Low-carbon strategy of demand-based regulating heating and lighting for the heterogeneous environment in beijing Venlo-type greenhouse," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    5. Garba, Ifeoluwa & Bellingham, Richard, 2021. "Energy poverty: Estimating the impact of solid cooking fuels on GDP per capita in developing countries - Case of sub-Saharan Africa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Morin, Philippe & Marcos, Bernard & Moresoli, Christine & Laflamme, Claude B., 2010. "Economic and environmental assessment on the energetic valorization of organic material for a municipality in Quebec, Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 275-283, January.
    7. Martinez, E. & Marcos, A. & Al-Kassir, A. & Jaramillo, M.A. & Mohamad, A.A., 2012. "Mathematical model of a laboratory-scale plant for slaughterhouse effluents biodigestion for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 210-219.
    8. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Hailong & Borrion, Aiduan & Yu, Zhixin & Li, Jinhui, 2018. "Kinetic studies on organic degradation and its impacts on improving methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 136-147.
    9. Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Ayodele, T.R. & Alao, M.A., 2017. "Electricity generation from municipal solid waste in some selected cities of Nigeria: An assessment of feasibility, potential and technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 149-162.
    10. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    11. Harrington, Elise & Athavankar, Ameya & Hsu, David, 2020. "Variation in rural household energy transitions for basic lighting in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    12. Grima-Olmedo, C. & Ramírez-Gómez, Á. & Alcalde-Cartagena, R., 2014. "Energetic performance of landfill and digester biogas in a domestic cooker," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 301-308.
    13. Wassie, Yibeltal T. & Rannestad, Meley M. & Adaramola, Muyiwa S., 2021. "Determinants of household energy choices in rural sub-Saharan Africa: An example from southern Ethiopia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Mazbahul G Ahamad & Fahian Tanin & Nawaraj Shrestha, 2021. "Household Smoke-Exposure Risks Associated with Cooking Fuels and Cooking Places in Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Demographic and Health Survey Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-11, March.
    15. Jingchao, Zhang & Kotani, Koji & Saijo, Tatsuyoshi, 2019. "Low-quality or high-quality coal? Household energy choice in rural Beijing," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 81-90.
    16. Yaghoubi, Jafar & Yazdanpanah, Masoud & Komendantova, Nadejda, 2019. "Iranian agriculture advisors' perception and intention toward biofuel: Green way toward energy security, rural development and climate change mitigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 452-459.
    17. Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Behera, Bhagirath & Ali, Akhter & Marenya, Paswel, 2017. "A ladder within a ladder: Understanding the factors influencing a household's domestic use of electricity in four African countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 167-181.
    18. Zi, Cao & Qian, Meng & Baozhong, Gao, 2021. "The consumption patterns and determining factors of rural household energy: A case study of Henan Province in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Buczkowski, Roman & Iglińska, Anna & Cichosz, Marcin & Piechota, Grzegorz & Kujawski, Wojciech, 2012. "Agricultural biogas plants in Poland: Investment process, economical and environmental aspects, biogas potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4890-4900.
    20. Ouazzani Chahidi, Laila & Fossa, Marco & Priarone, Antonella & Mechaqrane, Abdellah, 2021. "Energy saving strategies in sustainable greenhouse cultivation in the mediterranean climate – A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:80:y:2017:i:c:p:756-764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.