IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5222-d1098229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Emerging “Shared Mobility Hub” Concept in European Cities: Definition and a Proposed Typology

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasia Roukouni

    (Transport and Planning Department, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Inés Aquilué Junyent

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Miquel Martí Casanovas

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia

    (Transport and Planning Department, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Seamless, efficient transport intermodality is a key aspect of the transition of cities toward sustainable mobility. The new “shared mobility hub” concept is increasingly gaining attention as a potential way to make this urgently needed transition happen. The present paper aims to provide an insightful view of the promising concept of shared mobility hub, initially by looking into the existing literature on its definitions and how they are classified to form different typologies. Following that, a new, flexible typology framework for shared mobility hubs is proposed. This is then applied to several existing hubs in five different cities in The Netherlands (Amsterdam, Eindhoven and Helmond), Spain (Sant Cugat de Vallès, Metropolitan Area of Barcelona), and Portugal (Lisbon). As these countries have different shared mobility policies in place and their citizens have very different mobility habits, we were able to reflect on how the proposed typology functions in varied contexts. This paper contributes to the ongoing discussion of a very timely topic in Europe and worldwide, which is the need for the deployment of a new generation of mobility hubs, with an emphasis on shared mobility. We trust that the suggested typology can be useful to policy-makers, local authorities, and transport and urban planners, as it can help with the conducting of a first effective screening with regard to which type of hub is needed for each specific case.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasia Roukouni & Inés Aquilué Junyent & Miquel Martí Casanovas & Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, 2023. "An Analysis of the Emerging “Shared Mobility Hub” Concept in European Cities: Definition and a Proposed Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5222-:d:1098229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5222/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5222/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Real, Luiza Bernardes & Contreras, Ivan & Cordeau, Jean-François & de Camargo, Ricardo Saraiva & de Miranda, Gilberto, 2021. "Multimodal hub network design with flexible routes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Elnert Coenegrachts & Joris Beckers & Thierry Vanelslander & Ann Verhetsel, 2021. "Business Model Blueprints for the Shared Mobility Hub Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Anastasia Roukouni & Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, 2020. "Evaluation Methods for the Impacts of Shared Mobility: Classification and Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Montserrat Miramontes & Maximilian Pfertner & Hema Sharanya Rayaprolu & Martin Schreiner & Gebhard Wulfhorst, 2017. "Impacts of a multimodal mobility service on travel behavior and preferences: user insights from Munich’s first Mobility Station," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1325-1342, November.
    5. Chengjun Zhou & Halyna Petryshyn & Olha Kryvoruchko & Orest Kochan & Krzysztof Przystupa, 2022. "Potential and Opportunities of Use of Postindustrial Buildings and Territories for Urban Development: Case Studies of the Historical Area in Lviv (Ukraine)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & Antunes, António Pais, 2012. "Optimization approach to depot location and trip selection in one-way carsharing systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 233-247.
    7. González, Rosa Marina & Marrero, Gustavo A. & Rodríguez-López, Jesús & Marrero, Ángel S., 2019. "Analyzing CO2 emissions from passenger cars in Europe: A dynamic panel data approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1271-1281.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arvid Krüger & Uwe Altrock, 2023. "Mobility Hubs: A Way Out of Car Dependency Through a New Multifunctional Housing Development?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 112-125.
    2. Arnold, Thomas & Dale, Simon & Timmis, Andrew & Frost, Matthew & Ison, Stephen, 2023. "An exploratory study of Mobility Hub implementation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Rongen, Tibor & Tillema, Taede & Arts, Jos & Alonso-González, María J. & Witte, Jan-Jelle, 2022. "An analysis of the mobility hub concept in the Netherlands: Historical lessons for its implementation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. Allan Pimenta & Liton (Md) Kamruzzaman, 2024. "What About Land Uses in Mobility Hub Planning for Sustainable Travel Behavior?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Golalikhani, Masoud & Oliveira, Beatriz Brito & Carravilla, Maria Antónia & Oliveira, José Fernando & Antunes, António Pais, 2021. "Carsharing: A review of academic literature and business practices toward an integrated decision-support framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Huang, Kai & An, Kun & Rich, Jeppe & Ma, Wanjing, 2020. "Vehicle relocation in one-way station-based electric carsharing systems: A comparative study of operator-based and user-based methods," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    7. Wen Chen & Changyi Zhu & Qi Cheung & Siying Wu & Jun Zhang & Jia Cao, 2024. "How does digitization enable green innovation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 3832-3854, July.
    8. Mengwei Chen & Yilin Sun & E Owen D Waygood & Jincheng Yu & Kai Zhu, 2022. "User characteristics and service satisfaction of car sharing systems: Evidence from Hangzhou, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Terrien, Clara & Maniak, Rémi & Chen, Bo & Shaheen, Susan, 2016. "Good Practices for Advancing Urban Mobility Innovation: A Case Study of One-Way Carsharing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt53z3h2gt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Nair, Rahul & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2014. "Equilibrium network design of shared-vehicle systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 47-61.
    11. Philipp Ströhle & Christoph M. Flath & Johannes Gärttner, 2019. "Leveraging Customer Flexibility for Car-Sharing Fleet Optimization," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 42-61, February.
    12. Alberto Ponso & Angelo Bonfitto & Giovanni Belingardi, 2023. "Route Planning for Electric Vehicles Including Driving Style, HVAC, Payload and Battery Health," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Haseeb, Attiya & Mitra, Raktim, 2024. "Travel behaviour changes among young adults and associated implications for social sustainability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Susan Shaheen & Nelson Chan & Helen Micheaux, 2015. "One-way carsharing’s evolution and operator perspectives from the Americas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 519-536, May.
    15. Agatz, Niels & Erera, Alan & Savelsbergh, Martin & Wang, Xing, 2012. "Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 295-303.
    16. Wu, Peng, 2019. "Which battery-charging technology and insurance contract is preferred in the electric vehicle sharing business?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 537-548.
    17. Álvaro Aguilera-García & Juan Gomez & Natalia Sobrino & Juan José Vinagre Díaz, 2021. "Moped Scooter Sharing: Citizens’ Perceptions, Users’ Behavior, and Implications for Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    18. Yongji Jia & Wang Zeng & Yanting Xing & Dong Yang & Jia Li, 2020. "The Bike-Sharing Rebalancing Problem Considering Multi-Energy Mixed Fleets and Traffic Restrictions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Hussain, Moon Moon & Pal, Shreya & Villanthenkodath, Muhammed Ashiq, 2023. "Towards sustainable development: The impact of transport infrastructure expenditure on the ecological footprint in India," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(2).
    20. Abouelela, Mohamed & Durán-Rodas, David & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2024. "Do we all need shared E-scooters? An accessibility-centered spatial equity evaluation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5222-:d:1098229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.