IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16020-d989390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential and Opportunities of Use of Postindustrial Buildings and Territories for Urban Development: Case Studies of the Historical Area in Lviv (Ukraine)

Author

Listed:
  • Chengjun Zhou

    (School of Arts & Design, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
    Hubei Design and Research Center of Cultural and Creative Industry, No. 28, Nanli Road, Wuhan 430068, China)

  • Halyna Petryshyn

    (Department of Urban Planning and Design, Institute of Architecture & Design, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Olha Kryvoruchko

    (Department of Architecture & Engineering, Institute of Architecture & Design, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Orest Kochan

    (Department of Measuring Information Technologies, Institute of Computer Technologies, Automation and Metrology, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Bandera Str. 12, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine
    School of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

  • Krzysztof Przystupa

    (Department of Automation, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Industrial objects constructed between the XIX century and the first half of the XX century were scattered outside the historical city center. However, they are currently located within the boundaries of the historical area of a big city. Postindustrial objects that have lost their initial function create opportunities for city development. An urgent problem of urban planning in Lviv is to determine the prospects for the development and reconstruction of industrial areas, complexes, and buildings. The purpose of the work is to identify the modern urban trends in the development process of postindustrial areas located in the historic area of Lviv, as well as its compliance with the city development strategy. The article investigates the connection of new objects with the main functions of the district, provides a historical excursion of their development, on-site studies, and a comparative analysis of objects with the goals of the master plan of Lviv and of the integrated concept of development of the central part of the city. The studied objects of the urban revitalization of postindustrial buildings and areas are grouped according to new dominant function: 1—Development of the creative industry; 2—Revalued multifunctional areas; 3—Implementation of the concept of city center expansion; 4—Reconstruction of historical localities, and 5—Creation of new residential complexes. The authors consider the process of re-urbanization in some particular postindustrial areas and objects as a search for ideas to generalize their use for the whole city. The intensive industrial development of the city during the Soviet period led to strict regulation of other areas. After obtaining independence, there is an opportunity to fix the imbalance. This process occurs in different ways. In particular, the “in situ” review provides an opportunity to understand the development of the territory—whether it follows the master plan (or contradicts it), whether it meets the new development strategy of the city, whether it meets the needs of the local community, or meets the interests of developers only.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengjun Zhou & Halyna Petryshyn & Olha Kryvoruchko & Orest Kochan & Krzysztof Przystupa, 2022. "Potential and Opportunities of Use of Postindustrial Buildings and Territories for Urban Development: Case Studies of the Historical Area in Lviv (Ukraine)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16020-:d:989390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16020/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16020/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Knippschild & Constanze Zöllter, 2021. "Urban Regeneration between Cultural Heritage Preservation and Revitalization: Experiences with a Decision Support Tool in Eastern Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Timothy J. Bartik, 2009. "The Revitalization of Older Industrial Cities: A Review Essay of Retooling for Growth," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Agnieszka Konior & Weronika Pokojska, 2020. "Management of Postindustrial Heritage in Urban Revitalization Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Busisiwe Nkonki-Mandleni & Abiodun Olusola Omotayo & David Ikponmwosa Ighodaro & Samuel Babatunde Agbola, 2021. "Analysis of the Living Conditions at eZakheleni Informal Settlement of Durban: Implications for Community Revitalization in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Željka Čurović & Milić Čurović & Velibor Spalević & Milorad Janic & Paul Sestras & Svetislav G. Popović, 2019. "Identification and Evaluation of Landscape as a Precondition for Planning Revitalization and Development of Mediterranean Rural Settlements—Case Study: Mrkovi Village, Bay of Kotor, Montenegro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Tali Hatuka & Issachar Rosen-Zvi & Michael Birnhack & Eran Toch & Hadas Zur, 2018. "The Political Premises of Contemporary Urban Concepts: The Global City, the Sustainable City, the Resilient City, the Creative City, and the Smart City," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 160-179, March.
    7. Mateusz Gyurkovich & Jacek Gyurkovich, 2021. "New Housing Complexes in Post-Industrial Areas in City Centres in Poland Versus Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection—With a Particular Focus on Cracow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-36, January.
    8. Augustyn Wójcik & Piotr Bilski & Robert Łukaszewski & Krzysztof Dowalla & Ryszard Kowalik, 2021. "Identification of the State of Electrical Appliances with the Use of a Pulse Signal Generator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Mingshui Lin & Jingsong Jian & Hu Yu & Yanfang Zeng & Menglung Lin, 2021. "Research on the Spatial Pattern and Influence Mechanism of Industrial Transformation and Development of Traditional Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anastasia Roukouni & Inés Aquilué Junyent & Miquel Martí Casanovas & Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, 2023. "An Analysis of the Emerging “Shared Mobility Hub” Concept in European Cities: Definition and a Proposed Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sunny Han Han & Huimin Zhang, 2022. "Progress and Prospects in Industrial Heritage Reconstruction and Reuse Research during the Past Five Years: Review and Outlook," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Dagmara Adamkiewicz & Bartłomiej Szewczyk & Olga Kania, 2022. "Decision-Making Support for Housing Projects in Post-Industrial Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Dorota Wantuch-Matla & Sławomir Dorocki & Rafał Kroczak, 2023. "Spatial, Functional, and Landscape Changes in a Medium-Sized Post-Industrial City Based on Aerial Photo Analysis: The Case of Gorlice (Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Ernestyna Szpakowska-Loranc, 2021. "Multi-Attribute Analysis of Contemporary Cultural Buildings in the Historic Urban Fabric as Sustainable Spaces—Krakow Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Wang, Huanming & Ran, Bing, 2022. "How business-related governance strategies impact paths towards the formation of global cities? An institutional embeddedness perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    6. Aleksandra Kuzior & Wiesław Grebski & Aleksy Kwilinski & Dariusz Krawczyk & Michalene Eva Grebski, 2022. "Revitalization of Post-Industrial Facilities in Economic and Socio-Cultural Perspectives—A Comparative Study between Poland and the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Sławomir Pytel & Sławomir Sitek & Marta Chmielewska & Elżbieta Zuzańska-Żyśko & Anna Runge & Julita Markiewicz-Patkowska, 2021. "Transformation Directions of Brownfields: The Case of the Górnośląsko-Zagłębiowska Metropolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Linda Lobao & P. Wilner Jeanty & Mark Partridge & David Kraybill, 2012. "Poverty and Place across the United States," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 35(2), pages 158-187, April.
    9. Rafał Blazy & Hanna Hrehorowicz-Gaber & Alicja Hrehorowicz-Nowak, 2021. "Adaptation of Post-Industrial Areas as Hydrological Windows to Improve the City’s Microclimate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Assumpció Huertas & Antonio Moreno & Jordi Pascual, 2021. "Place Branding for Smart Cities and Smart Tourism Destinations: Do They Communicate Their Smartness?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Sarah Cechvala & Brian Ganson, 2024. "Systems Perspectives on Business and Peace: The Contingent Nature of Business-Related Action with Respect to Peace Positive Impacts," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 523-544, October.
    12. Magdalena Grebosz-Krawczyk, 2021. "Place branding (r)evolution: the management of the smart city’s brand," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(1), pages 93-104, March.
    13. Goran Skataric & Velibor Spalevic & Svetislav Popovic & Nenad Perosevic & Rajko Novicevic, 2021. "The Vernacular and Rural Houses of Agrarian Areas in the Zeta Region, Montenegro," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-35, July.
    14. Krzysztof Dowalla & Piotr Bilski & Robert Łukaszewski & Augustyn Wójcik & Ryszard Kowalik, 2022. "Application of the Time-Domain Signal Analysis for Electrical Appliances Identification in the Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Qindong Fan & Fengtian Du & Hu Li, 2020. "A Study of the Spatial Form of Maling Village, Henan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Jeffrey Thompson, 2010. "Prioritizing Approaches to Economic Development in New England: Skills, Infrastructure, and Tax Incentives," Published Studies priorities_september7_per, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    17. Gusti Ayu Made Suartika & Alexander Cuthbert, 2020. "The Sustainable Imperative—Smart Cities, Technology and Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Sanober Naheed & Salman Shooshtarian, 2022. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Promoting Urban Sustainability: A Brief Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Shu-Yen Wang & Shyh-Huei Hwang, 2019. "Research on Field Reconstruction and Community Design of Living Settlements—An Example of Repairing a Fish Stove in the Hua-Zhai Settlement on Wang-An Island, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-30, October.
    20. Meiyan Li & Wen Ouyang & Dayu Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Traditional Villages in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16020-:d:989390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.