IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4884-d1092364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis of Collaborative Innovation Mechanisms of Industrial Internet Platform-Based Ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Huiyan Zhao

    (School of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China)

  • Haijun Wang

    (School of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China)

  • Shutong Jin

    (School of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China)

  • Zitong He

    (School of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China)

Abstract

Digital platforms are transforming almost every industry today. To gain insight into the innovation mechanism of the industrial Internet platform-based ecosystem, combining its nature of sustainability, this paper investigates strategic factors, such as the intensity of platform governance, the eco-efficiency of cooperation, and the input costs of complementors. A platform ecological system game model comprised of the industrial Internet platform enterprise, industry chain complementors, and innovation chain complementors is then established. The results of game playing and simulation highlight four important facts as revealed by a Chinese COSMOPlat case. First, there are four evolutionary paths for collaborative relations among innovation entities in an ecosystem. Second, platform enterprise may utilize various strategies in the several stages of ecosystem evolution. Third, complementors in the industrial chain and innovation chain have different degrees of dependence on platform enterprise and distinct incentive factors. Finally, investment of platform enterprise in data security drives the construction and upgrading of the ecosystem. In this context, collaborative innovation in platform ecosystems is associated with a self-evolving, self-growing, self-driven, and sustainable cooperation and win–win mechanism. This study provides new ideas for the governance of the industrial Internet platform-based ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Huiyan Zhao & Haijun Wang & Shutong Jin & Zitong He, 2023. "Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis of Collaborative Innovation Mechanisms of Industrial Internet Platform-Based Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4884-:d:1092364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4884/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4884/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doganova, Liliana & Eyquem-Renault, Marie, 2009. "What do business models do?: Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1559-1570, December.
    2. Amrit Tiwana & Benn Konsynski & Ashley A. Bush, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 675-687, December.
    3. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    4. Yuki Inoue & Masataka Hashimoto & Takeshi Takenaka, 2019. "Effectiveness of Ecosystem Strategies for the Sustainability of Marketplace Platform Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-33, October.
    5. Jovanovic, Marin & Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit, 2022. "Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: Expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    6. Dongdong Li & Chunfa Li & Runde Gu & Daqing Gong, 2021. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Promoting Industrial Internet Platforms to Empower Manufacturing SMEs through Value Cocreation Cooperation," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-14, September.
    7. Junic Kim, 2016. "The platform business model and business ecosystem: quality management and revenue structures," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(12), pages 2113-2132, December.
    8. Amrit Tiwana, 2015. "Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 266-281, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu Wu & Shiting He & Qingsong Zhang & Jinxin Shi & Jiang Xie, 2023. "Evolution Game and Simulation Analysis of Disturbance Emergency Disposal of In-Flight Cabin: China Civil Aviation Security Strategy Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kapoor, Kawaljeet & Ziaee Bigdeli, Ali & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Schroeder, Andreas & Beltagui, Ahmad & Baines, Tim, 2021. "A socio-technical view of platform ecosystems: Systematic review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 94-108.
    2. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    3. Jens Foerderer & Thomas Kude & Sunil Mithas & Armin Heinzl, 2018. "Does Platform Owner’s Entry Crowd Out Innovation? Evidence from Google Photos," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 444-460, June.
    4. Karl Taeuscher, 2019. "Uncertainty kills the long tail: demand concentration in peer-to-peer marketplaces," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 649-660, December.
    5. Tobias Riasanow & Lea Jäntgen & Sebastian Hermes & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2021. "Core, intertwined, and ecosystem-specific clusters in platform ecosystems: analyzing similarities in the digital transformation of the automotive, blockchain, financial, insurance and IIoT industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 89-104, March.
    6. Mucha, Tomasz & Seppälä, Timo, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence Platforms – A New Research Agenda for Digital Platform Economy," ETLA Working Papers 76, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    7. Jens Foerderer & Nele Lueker & Armin Heinzl, 2021. "And the Winner Is …? The Desirable and Undesirable Effects of Platform Awards," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1155-1172, December.
    8. Zhong, Qi & Sun, Yaowu, 2020. "The more the better? Relational governance in platforms and the role of appropriability mechanisms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 62-73.
    9. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Feng, Lipan & Li, Rong, 2020. "Information disclosure structure in supply chains with rental service platforms in the blockchain technology era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    10. Erik Hartigh & Claire C.M. Stolwijk & J. Roland Ortt & L. Matthijs Punter, 2023. "Configurations of digital platforms for manufacturing: An analysis of seven cases according to platform functions and types," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    12. Peng, Hui & Lu, Yaobin & Gupta, Sumeet, 2023. "Promoting value emergence through digital platform ecosystems: Perspectives on resource integration in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Jorge Mejia & Anandasivam Gopal & Michael Trusov, 2020. "Deal or No Deal? Online Deals, Retailer Heterogeneity, and Brand Evaluations in a Competitive Environment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1087-1106, December.
    14. Andreas Hein & Maximilian Schreieck & Tobias Riasanow & David Soto Setzke & Manuel Wiesche & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2020. "Digital platform ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 87-98, March.
    15. Fabian Schueler & Dimitri Petrik, 2022. "Objectives of platform research: A co-citation and systematic literature review analysis," Papers 2202.08822, arXiv.org.
    16. Jens Foerderer, 2020. "Interfirm Exchange and Innovation in Platform Ecosystems: Evidence from Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4772-4787, October.
    17. Gregory Vial, 2023. "A Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective of Software Reuse in the Digital Age: An Agenda for IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1728-1743, December.
    18. Milan Miric & Hakan Ozalp & Erdem Dogukan Yilmaz, 2023. "Trade‐offs to using standardized tools: Innovation enablers or creativity constraints?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 909-942, April.
    19. Brunswicker, Sabine & Schecter, Aaron, 2019. "Coherence or flexibility? The paradox of change for developers’ digital innovation trajectory on open platforms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    20. Carmelo Cennamo & Hakan Ozalp & Tobias Kretschmer, 2018. "Platform Architecture and Quality Trade-offs of Multihoming Complements," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 461-478, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4884-:d:1092364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.