IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4346-d1083876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of YouTube on Present and Future Firm Value: Using Unstructured Text Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hyung Jong Na

    (Department of Accounting and Taxation, Semyung University, Jecheon 27136, Republic of Korea)

  • Yong Ha Kim

    (Department of Financial Economics, Soongsil University, Sangdoro 369, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea)

  • Hyun Jin Jo

    (Department of Big Data Analytics, KyungHee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study aims to provide research results through empirical analysis on how customers’ reactions on social media affect the present and future value of a company. This research selected Korean KOSPI-listed companies that actually own and operate YouTube channels, and collected data through text mining the comments on YouTube videos with high views. In addition, the TF-IDF value was calculated, keywords were extracted, and keywords were classified into three groups through topic modeling. The characteristics of the three groups could be transformed into a “current-oriented topic” as advertising promotion content focused on fun or interest; a “future-oriented topic” as critical content pointing out problems, and a “neutral topic” as content of a neutral attitude toward companies. This study uses a regression analysis model to perform an empirical analysis by setting a company’s YouTube-related variable as an independent variable and setting a company’s current value and future value-related variable as a dependent variable. The results of this research are as follows. First, this paper found that companies that directly operate and manage YouTube accounts currently have lower corporate value than those that do not. Second, this study also found that companies which directly operate and manage YouTube accounts have higher future corporate value than those that do not. Third, the results showed that if a customer simply mentions interesting content or advertising/promotion-related content through corporate YouTube comments, the current corporate value may be improved in the short term, but in the long term, it has a negative effect on future corporate value. Fourth, the results of this research also presented that if a customer criticizes a company or points out a company’s problems through YouTube comments, the current corporate value decreases due to damage to the company’s image, but it was found that the future corporate value increases. Fifth, this paper found that neutral content, not just for fun and interest, nor for constructive criticism or dissatisfaction with the company, was not related to the company’s current and future corporate value. The contributions and expected effects of this paper are as follows. First of all, this paper provides useful information through research results which shows that companies are more advantageous in improving future corporate value from a long-term perspective by strategically operating social media directly. In addition, the research results of this study objectively demonstrated through YouTube channels that it is more helpful for companies in the long run to respond well to customer complaints and negative opinions, and to implement policies that continuously manage customer opinions. Finally, the research method used in this paper, that is, the research methodology that conducted empirical analysis through quantification of unstructured tax data, is expected to provide guidelines for many scholars to expand the scope of data available for empirical research in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyung Jong Na & Yong Ha Kim & Hyun Jin Jo, 2023. "The Impact of YouTube on Present and Future Firm Value: Using Unstructured Text Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4346-:d:1083876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4346/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4346/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Umair Akram & Melinda Timea Fülöp & Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Dan Ioan Topor & Sorinel Căpușneanu, 2021. "Impact of Digitalization on Customers’ Well-Being in the Pandemic Period: Challenges and Opportunities for the Retail Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Hsu, Liwu & Lawrence, Benjamin, 2016. "The role of social media and brand equity during a product recall crisis: A shareholder value perspective," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 59-77.
    3. Nisar, Tahir M. & Prabhakar, Guru & Strakova, Lubica, 2019. "Social media information benefits, knowledge management and smart organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 264-272.
    4. Lim, Weng Marc & Rasul, Tareq, 2022. "Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 325-342.
    5. Bigdellou, Saeide & Aslani, Shirin & Modarres, Mohammad, 2022. "Optimal promotion planning for a product launch in the presence of word-of-mouth," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Terry Beckman & Alison Colwell & Peggy Cunningham, 2009. "The Emergence of Corporate Social Responsibility in Chile: The Importance of Authenticity and Social Networks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 191-206, March.
    7. Zachary McGurk & Adam Nowak & Joshua C. Hall, 2020. "Stock returns and investor sentiment: textual analysis and social media," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 44(3), pages 458-485, July.
    8. John Griffith & Mohammad Najand & Jiancheng Shen, 2020. "Emotions in the Stock Market," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 42-56, January.
    9. Liangfei Qiu & Subodha Kumar, 2017. "Understanding Voluntary Knowledge Provision and Content Contribution Through a Social-Media-Based Prediction Market: A Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 529-546, September.
    10. Lisa Schweitzer, 2014. "Planning and Social Media: A Case Study of Public Transit and Stigma on Twitter," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(3), pages 218-238, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Gaoshan & Yu, Guangjin & Shen, Xiaohong, 2021. "The effect of online environmental news on green industry stocks: The mediating role of investor sentiment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 573(C).
    2. Tian, Xin & Zhu, Jiayi & Zhao, Xuan & Zhou, Xiaoyang, 2024. "Unveiling insights from online shopping carnivals: A pre-vs-post analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Mirzaei, Abas & Wilkie, Dean C. & Siuki, Helen, 2022. "Woke brand activism authenticity or the lack of it," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Sarker, Rumana Islam & Kaplan, Sigal & Mailer, Markus & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2019. "Applying affective event theory to explain transit users’ reactions to service disruptions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 593-605.
    5. Gwarlann Kerviler & Nico Heuvinck & Elodie Gentina, 2022. "“Make an Effort and Show Me the Love!” Effects of Indexical and Iconic Authenticity on Perceived Brand Ethicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 89-110, August.
    6. Monica Martinez-Blasco & Vanessa Serrano & Francesc Prior & Jordi Cuadros, 2023. "Analysis of an event study using the Fama–French five-factor model: teaching approaches including spreadsheets and the R programming language," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, December.
    7. Karimi, Majid & Zaerpour, Nima, 2022. "Put your money where your forecast is: Supply chain collaborative forecasting with cost-function-based prediction markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 1035-1049.
    8. Svatopluk Kapounek & Zuzana Kučerová & Evžen Kočenda, 2022. "Selective Attention in Exchange Rate Forecasting," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 210-229, May.
    9. Singh, Jaywant & Crisafulli, Benedetta & Quamina, La Toya & Xue, Melanie Tao, 2020. "‘To trust or not to trust’: The impact of social media influencers on the reputation of corporate brands in crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 464-480.
    10. Mônica Cavalcanti Sá de Abreu & Romulo Alves Soares & Victor Daniel‐Vasconcelos & Vicente Lima Crisóstomo, 2023. "Does board diversity encourage an environmental policy focused on resource use, emission reduction and innovation? The case of companies in Latin America," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1161-1176, May.
    11. Qili Wang & Liangfei Qiu & Wei Xu, 2024. "Informal Payments and Doctor Engagement in an Online Health Community: An Empirical Investigation Using Generalized Synthetic Control," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 706-726, June.
    12. Liu, Dong & Varki, Sajeev, 2021. "The spillover effect of product recalls on competitors’ market value: The role of corporate product reliability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 452-463.
    13. Baobao Song & Xiaomeng Lan, 2022. "Meeting Consumers’ Expectations: Exploring Corporate Social Advocacy Communication in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung & Ji Yeon Yang, 2016. "Employees’ Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Person–CSR Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Kathleen Cleeren & Marnik G. Dekimpe & Harald J. Heerde, 2017. "Marketing research on product-harm crises: a review, managerial implications, and an agenda for future research," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 593-615, September.
    16. Liangfei Qiu & Yili (Kevin) Hong & Andrew Whinston, 2022. "Special Issue of Production and Operations Management “Social Technologies in Operations”," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 868-869, February.
    17. Viveros, Hector, 2017. "Unpacking stakeholder mechanisms to influence corporate social responsibility in the mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-12.
    18. Stephanie Cheng & Pengkai Lin & Yinliang Tan & Yuchen Zhang, 2023. "“High” innovators? Marijuana legalization and regional innovation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 685-703, March.
    19. Yang Gao & Wenjing Duan & Huaxia Rui, 2022. "Does Social Media Accelerate Product Recalls? Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 954-977, September.
    20. Zhijun Yan & Lini Kuang & Liangfei Qiu, 2022. "Prosocial behaviors and economic performance: Evidence from an online mental healthcare platform," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3859-3876, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4346-:d:1083876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.