IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4146-d1079648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the Key Drivers for the Acceptance and Usage of AR and VR in Cultural Heritage Monuments

Author

Listed:
  • Xinlu Wen

    (Ningbo University-University of Angers Joint Institute, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Marios Sotiriadis

    (Ningbo University-University of Angers Joint Institute, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Shiwei Shen

    (Ningbo University-University of Angers Joint Institute, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

Abstract

An increasing number of visitor attractions and monuments are designing and implementing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies and services to enhance tourists’ experiences and make their visit more attractive and enjoyable. It is essential to acquire an in-depth understanding of AR/VR applications and their influence on consumers’ experience. This paper set to investigate the key factors influencing tourists to adopt and use AR and VR applications by exploring the consumers’ perceptions within the cultural heritage settings, focusing on the use of technological tools during the on-site experience (core service experience). This study applied the Ntheoretical basis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) and suggested a research model of twelve hypotheses. The latter was empirically investigated within the Chinese context in two cultural heritage monuments. The findings indicated that AR/VR technology plays an important role in influencing the tourism experience. Performance expectancy, price value, habit, personal innovativeness, and involvement significantly positively affect behavioral intention. The most important drivers are price value and facilitating conditions. This study’s contribution is twofold: (i) theoretical, by elaborating an extended framework for digital technologies implemented in a challenging field of visitors’ experience, and (ii) practical, by formulating a set of suggestions for industry practitioners as well as designers and developers of AR/VR applications regarding the effective design and implementation of AR/VR technologies in cultural heritage monuments.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinlu Wen & Marios Sotiriadis & Shiwei Shen, 2023. "Determining the Key Drivers for the Acceptance and Usage of AR and VR in Cultural Heritage Monuments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4146-:d:1079648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4146/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4146/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sung S. Kim & Naresh K. Malhotra, 2005. "A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms Underlying Postadoption Phenomena," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 741-755, May.
    2. Eleanor E. Cranmer & M. Claudia Dieck & Timothy Jung, 2018. "How can Tourist Attractions Profit from Augmented Reality?," Progress in IS, in: Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck (ed.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, pages 21-32, Springer.
    3. Ritu Agarwal & Jayesh Prasad, 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 204-215, June.
    4. Celine Zhao Ying Yin & Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck & Maria Younghee Lee, 2021. "Mobile Augmented Reality Heritage Applications: Meeting the Needs of Heritage Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    6. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    7. Ramon Palau-Saumell & Santiago Forgas-Coll & Javier Sánchez-García & Emilio Robres, 2019. "User Acceptance of Mobile Apps for Restaurants: An Expanded and Extended UTAUT-2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Kuttimani Tamilmani & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2021. "Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of UTAUT2," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 987-1005, August.
    9. Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck & Hyunae Lee & Namho Chung, 2020. "Relationships among Beliefs, Attitudes, Time Resources, Subjective Norms, and Intentions to Use Wearable Augmented Reality in Art Galleries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Seokho Han & Ji-Hwan Yoon & Jookyung Kwon, 2021. "Impact of Experiential Value of Augmented Reality: The Context of Heritage Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Chi-Yo Huang & Yu-Sheng Kao, 2015. "UTAUT2 Based Predictions of Factors Influencing the Technology Acceptance of Phablets by DNP," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-23, August.
    12. Azizul Hassan & Erdogan Ekiz & Sumesh S. Dadwal & Geoff Lancaster, 2018. "Augmented Reality Adoption by Tourism Product and Service Consumers: Some Empirical Findings," Progress in IS, in: Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck (ed.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, pages 47-64, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singh, Pratibha & Sharma, Mahak & Daim, Tugrul, 2024. "Envisaging AR travel revolution for visiting heritage sites: A mixed-method approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Jiahui Guo & Younghwan Pan, 2023. "What Factors Impact Visitors’ Intentions to Use Location-Based AR Games? An Empirical Study from Chinese Cultural Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Yu-Sheng Kao & Kazumitsu Nawata & Chi-Yo Huang, 2019. "An Exploration and Confirmation of the Factors Influencing Adoption of IoT-Based Wearable Fitness Trackers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-31, September.
    4. Susan A. Brown & Viswanath Venkatesh & Sandeep Goyal, 2012. "Expectation Confirmation in Technology Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 474-487, June.
    5. Weiyin Hong & Frank K. Y. Chan & James Y. L. Thong & Lewis C. Chasalow & Gurpreet Dhillon, 2014. "A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 111-136, March.
    6. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Amit Shankar & Biplab Datta, 2018. "Factors Affecting Mobile Payment Adoption Intention: An Indian Perspective," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3_suppl), pages 72-89, June.
    8. Ivonne Angelica Castiblanco Jimenez & Laura Cristina Cepeda García & Maria Grazia Violante & Federica Marcolin & Enrico Vezzetti, 2020. "Commonly Used External TAM Variables in e-Learning, Agriculture and Virtual Reality Applications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    10. Hossain, Akram & Quaresma, Rui & Rahman, Habibur, 2019. "Investigating factors influencing the physicians’ adoption of electronic health record (EHR) in healthcare system of Bangladesh: An empirical study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 76-87.
    11. Jan Silberer & Stefanie Astfalk & Patrick Planing & Patrick Müller, 2023. "User needs over time: the market and technology maturity model (MTMM)," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2020. "Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    13. Seok Chan Jeong & Beom-Jin Choi, 2022. "Moderating Effects of Consumers’ Personal Innovativeness on the Adoption and Purchase Intention of Wearable Devices," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    14. El Barachi, May & Salim, Taghreed Abu & Nyadzayo, Munyaradzi W. & Mathew, Sujith & Badewi, Amgad & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2022. "The relationship between citizen readiness and the intention to continuously use smart city services: Mediating effects of satisfaction and discomfort," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. John D'Ambra & Concepción S. Wilson & Shahriar Akter, 2013. "Application of the task-technology fit model to structure and evaluate the adoption of E-books by Academics," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 48-64, January.
    16. Baudier, Patricia & Ammi, Chantal & Deboeuf-Rouchon, Matthieu, 2020. "Smart home: Highly-educated students' acceptance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    17. Julian Schuir & Frank Teuteberg, 2021. "Understanding augmented reality adoption trade-offs in production environments from the perspective of future employees: A choice-based conjoint study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1039-1085, September.
    18. Gary Cokins & Ionica Oncioiu & Mirela Cătălina Türkeș & Dan Ioan Topor & Sorinel Căpuşneanu & Carmen Adina Paștiu & Delia Deliu & Alina Nicoleta Solovăstru, 2020. "Intention to Use Accounting Platforms in Romania: A Quantitative Study on Sustainability and Social Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Avornyo, Philip & Fang, Jiaming & Antwi, Collins Opoku & Aboagye, Michael Osei & Boadi, Evans Asante, 2019. "Are customers still with us? The influence of optimum stimulation level and IT-specific traits on mobile banking discontinuous usage intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 348-360.
    20. Iviane Ramos-de-Luna & Francisco Montoro-Ríos & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, 2016. "Determinants of the intention to use NFC technology as a payment system: an acceptance model approach," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-314, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4146-:d:1079648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.