IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4067-d1077916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Board Governance on Firm Risk among China’s A-Share Market-Listed Companies from 2010 to 2019

Author

Listed:
  • Na Xu

    (Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Wendong Lv

    (Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Junli Wang

    (Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

This paper selects firm downside risk and firm upside risk as proxy variables of enterprise risk, and the proportion of independent directors as a proxy variable of board governance. Using the panel data of Chinese listed companies from 2010 to 2019, a multiple linear regression model is established to empirically study the impact of supervisory function and advisory function of board governance on the downside risk and the upside risk, to test whether the two functions of the board of directors play a role in the enterprise risk management (ERM). The internal mechanism and boundary conditions of board governance that affect firm risk are also explored in this paper. It is found that the sample enterprises pay more attention to the board‘s supervisory function. At the same time, they reduce the firm’s overall risk by reducing the downside risk and the upside risk while performing this function. We also identify that boards are more likely to use meetings to communicate and strategize to prevent upside risks than to identify and control downside risks. Finally, boards are negatively affected by CEO duality in performing their oversight functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Na Xu & Wendong Lv & Junli Wang, 2023. "The Impact of Board Governance on Firm Risk among China’s A-Share Market-Listed Companies from 2010 to 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4067-:d:1077916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4067/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4067/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aebi, Vincent & Sabato, Gabriele & Schmid, Markus, 2012. "Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3213-3226.
    2. Nidhi Bansal & Anil K. Sharma, 2016. "Audit Committee, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from India," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(3), pages 103-116, March.
    3. Tuan-Hock Ng & Lee-Lee Chong & Hishamuddin Ismail, 2012. "Is the risk management committee only a procedural compliance?: An insight into managing risk taking among insurance companies in Malaysia," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 14(1), pages 71-86, December.
    4. Ahmed A. Elamer & Ismail Benyazid, 2018. "The impact of risk committee on financial performance of UK financial institutions," International Journal of Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 161-180.
    5. Ira C. Harris & Katsuhiko Shimizu, 2004. "Too Busy To Serve? An Examination of the Influence of Overboarded Directors," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 775-798, July.
    6. Masturah Malik & Rohami Shafie & Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail, 2021. "Do risk management committee characteristics influence the market value of firms?," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 172-191, June.
    7. Agarwal, Samanvaya & Kamath, Saipriya & Subramanian, Krishnamurthy & Tantri, Prasanna, 2022. "Board conduct in banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Azlan Amran & Abdul Manaf Rosli Bin & Bin Che Haat Mohd Hassan, 2008. "Risk reporting: An exploratory study on risk management disclosure in Malaysian annual reports," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(1), pages 39-57, November.
    9. Kenneth A. Borokhovich & Kelly R. Brunarski & Claire E. Crutchley & Betty J. Simkins, 2004. "Board Composition And Corporate Use Of Interest Rate Derivatives," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 199-216, June.
    10. Wang, Li-Hsun & Lin, Chu-Hsiung & Fung, Hung-Gay & Chen, Hsien-Ming, 2015. "Governance mechanisms and downside risk," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(PB), pages 485-498.
    11. Baysinger, Barry D & Butler, Henry N, 1985. "Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 101-124, Spring.
    12. Gupta, Kartick & Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar & Tourani-Rad, Alireza, 2013. "Is corporate governance relevant during the financial crisis?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 85-110.
    13. Beasley, Mark S. & Clune, Richard & Hermanson, Dana R., 2005. "Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 521-531.
    14. Georges Dionne & Thouraya Triki, 2005. "Risk Management and Corporate Governance: the Importance of Independence and Financial Knowledge for the Board and the Audit Committee," Cahiers de recherche 0515, CIRPEE.
    15. Robert E. Hoyt & Andre P. Liebenberg, 2011. "The Value of Enterprise Risk Management," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 78(4), pages 795-822, December.
    16. Renée B. Adams & Heitor Almeida & Daniel Ferreira, 2005. "Powerful CEOs and Their Impact on Corporate Performance," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1403-1432.
    17. John, Kose & Senbet, Lemma W., 1998. "Corporate governance and board effectiveness1," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 371-403, May.
    18. Hania Rehman & Muhammad Ramzan & Muhammad Zia Ul Haq & Jinsoo Hwang & Kyoung-Bae Kim, 2021. "Risk Management in Corporate Governance Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Liu, Guoping & Sun, Jerry, 2021. "Independent directors’ legal expertise, bank risk-taking and performance," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Na Xu & Wendong Lv & Junli Wang, 2024. "The impact of digital transformation on firm performance: a perspective from enterprise risk management," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(2), pages 369-400, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masturah Malik & Rohami Shafie & Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail, 2021. "Do risk management committee characteristics influence the market value of firms?," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 172-191, June.
    2. Abdulateif A. Almulhim & Abdullah A. Aljughaiman & Abdulaziz S. Al Naim & Abdulmohsen K. Alosaimi, 2024. "Effects of Risk Committee on Agency Costs and Financial Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Gundula Glowka & Andreas Kallmünzer & Anita Zehrer, 2021. "Enterprise risk management in small and medium family enterprises: the role of family involvement and CEO tenure," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1213-1231, September.
    4. Renee B. Adams & Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael S. Weisbach, 2010. "The Role of Boards of Directors in Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Framework and Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(1), pages 58-107, March.
    5. Dupire, Marion & Slagmulder, Regine, 2019. "Risk governance of financial institutions: The effect of ownership structure and board independence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 227-237.
    6. Malik, Muhammad Farhan & Zaman, Mahbub & Buckby, Sherrena, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    7. Tai, Vivian W. & Lai, Yi-Hsun & Yang, Tung-Hsiao, 2020. "The role of the board and the audit committee in corporate risk management," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    8. Eckles, David L. & Hoyt, Robert E. & Miller, Steve M., 2014. "Reprint of: The impact of enterprise risk management on the marginal cost of reducing risk: Evidence from the insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 409-423.
    9. Ivana Dvorski Lacković & Nataša Kurnoga & Danijela Miloš Sprčić, 2022. "Three-factor model of Enterprise Risk Management implementation: exploratory study of non-financial companies," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(2), pages 101-122, June.
    10. Eckles, David L. & Hoyt, Robert E. & Miller, Steve M., 2014. "The impact of enterprise risk management on the marginal cost of reducing risk: Evidence from the insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 247-261.
    11. Walter Gontarek & Yacine Belghitar, 2018. "Risk governance: Examining its impact upon bank performance and risk‐taking," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 187-224, December.
    12. Chen, Yu-Lun & Chuang, Yi-Wei & Huang, Hong-Gia & Shih, Jhuan-Yu, 2020. "The value of implementing enterprise risk management: Evidence from Taiwan’s financial industry," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    13. Uribe-Bohorquez, María-Victoria & Martínez-Ferrero, Jennifer & García-Sánchez, Isabel-María, 2018. "Board independence and firm performance: The moderating effect of institutional context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 28-43.
    14. Gundula Glowka & Andreas Kallmünzer & Anita Zehrer, 0. "Enterprise risk management in small and medium family enterprises: the role of family involvement and CEO tenure," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    15. Therese R. Viscelli & Mark S. Beasley & Dana R. Hermanson, 2016. "Research Insights About Risk Governance," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    16. Catarina Fernandes & Jorge Farinha & Francisco Vitorino Martins & Cesario Mateus, 2018. "Bank governance and performance: a survey of the literature," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 236-256, July.
    17. Sabur Mollah & Omar Farooque & Asma Mobarek & Philip Molyneux, 2019. "Bank Corporate Governance and Future Earnings Predictability," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 56(3), pages 369-394, December.
    18. Malik, Muhammad Farhan & Nowland, John & Buckby, Sherrena, 2021. "Voluntary adoption of board risk committees and financial constraints risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    19. Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2018. "The impact of market competition on the relation between CEO power and firm innovation," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 36-50.
    20. Abdelrhman Yusuf & Mohamed Sherif, 2020. "All on Board? New Evidence on Board Characteristics from a Large Panel of UK FTSE Indices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-26, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4067-:d:1077916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.