IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i8p328-d1447368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Risk Committee on Agency Costs and Financial Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulateif A. Almulhim

    (Finance Department, Business School, King Faisal University, Al-ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdullah A. Aljughaiman

    (Finance Department, Business School, King Faisal University, Al-ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulaziz S. Al Naim

    (Accounting Department, Business School, King Faisal University, Al-ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulmohsen K. Alosaimi

    (Finance Department, Business School, King Saud University, Riyadh 4545, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the influence of risk committee characteristics on agency costs and financial performance as well as investigate whether the attributes of a risk committee moderate the association between the agency costs and financial performance of financial firms listed in the Saudi Stock Market (TASI). We primarily concentrate on six attributes of risk committees (risk committee existence, size, independence, meetings, financial expertise, and busyness) and their impact on agency costs and financial performance. This study employed the ordinary least squares (OLS) and generalized methods of moments (GMM) models to explore these relationships. Using a sample of 455 observations representing the financial corporations listed on the TASI for the period from 2010 to 2022, we found that risk committees’ existence, risk committee independence, and financial expertise have negative and significant associations with agency costs, but a positive influence on financial performance. However, risk committee size and busyness are positively related to agency costs and adversely associated with firms’ financial performance. Furthermore, we showed that agency costs influence banks’ financial performance negatively, yet risk committees oversee this risk and enhance banks’ financial performance. The findings of this study have implications for financial firms, policymakers, and regulators. Beyond making empirical contributions by investigating a relatively unexplored topic in a developing Middle Eastern economy, this analysis provides valuable insights into optimizing risk committee characteristics and structures to improve financial monitoring within the framework of Saudi Arabia. This area of research has been relatively limited compared to studies conducted in developed countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulateif A. Almulhim & Abdullah A. Aljughaiman & Abdulaziz S. Al Naim & Abdulmohsen K. Alosaimi, 2024. "Effects of Risk Committee on Agency Costs and Financial Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:328-:d:1447368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/328/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/328/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farag, Hisham & Mallin, Chris & Ow-Yong, Kean, 2018. "Corporate governance in Islamic banks: New insights for dual board structure and agency relationships," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 59-77.
    2. Aebi, Vincent & Sabato, Gabriele & Schmid, Markus, 2012. "Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3213-3226.
    3. Yan‐Leung Cheung & Aris Stouraitis & Weiqiang Tan, 2010. "Does the Quality of Corporate Governance Affect Firm Valuation and Risk? Evidence from a Corporate Governance Scorecard in Hong Kong," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 10(4), pages 403-432, December.
    4. Gupta, Kartick & Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar & Tourani-Rad, Alireza, 2013. "Is corporate governance relevant during the financial crisis?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 85-110.
    5. Beasley, Mark S. & Clune, Richard & Hermanson, Dana R., 2005. "Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 521-531.
    6. Singh, Manohar & Davidson III, Wallace N., 2003. "Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 793-816, May.
    7. Puan Yatim, 2010. "Board structures and the establishment of a risk management committee by Malaysian listed firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 14(1), pages 17-36, February.
    8. Mohammad Ziaul Hoque & MD. Rabiul Islam & Mohammad Nurul Azam, 2013. "Board Committee Meetings and Firm Financial Performance: An Investigation of Australian Companies," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 13(4), pages 503-528, December.
    9. Ritesh Patel, 2018. "Pre & Post-Merger Financial Performance: An Indian Perspective," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 7(3), pages 181-200.
    10. Kenneth A. Borokhovich & Kelly R. Brunarski & Claire E. Crutchley & Betty J. Simkins, 2004. "Board Composition And Corporate Use Of Interest Rate Derivatives," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 199-216, June.
    11. Allen N. Berger & Björn Imbierowicz & Christian Rauch, 2016. "The Roles of Corporate Governance in Bank Failures during the Recent Financial Crisis," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(4), pages 729-770, June.
    12. Wintoki, M. Babajide & Linck, James S. & Netter, Jeffry M., 2012. "Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 581-606.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Na Xu & Wendong Lv & Junli Wang, 2023. "The Impact of Board Governance on Firm Risk among China’s A-Share Market-Listed Companies from 2010 to 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Malik, Muhammad Farhan & Zaman, Mahbub & Buckby, Sherrena, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    3. Ahmad, Sardar & Akbar, Saeed & Halari, Anwar & Shah, Syed Zubair, 2021. "Organizational non-compliance with principles-based governance provisions and corporate risk-taking," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Masturah Malik & Rohami Shafie & Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail, 2021. "Do risk management committee characteristics influence the market value of firms?," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 172-191, June.
    5. Mohamed Marie & Hany Kamel & Israa Elbendary, 2021. "How does internal governance affect banks’ financial stability? Empirical evidence from Egypt," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 240-255, September.
    6. Safiullah, Md, 2020. "Bank governance and crisis-period efficiency: A multinational study on Islamic and conventional banks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Subhan Ullah & Sardar Ahmad & Saeed Akbar & Devendra Kodwani & Jane Frecknall‐Hughes, 2021. "Governance disclosure quality and market valuation of firms in UK and Germany," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5031-5055, October.
    8. Catarina Fernandes & Jorge Farinha & Francisco Vitorino Martins & Cesario Mateus, 2018. "Bank governance and performance: a survey of the literature," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 236-256, July.
    9. Mavrakana, Christina & Psillaki, Maria, 2019. "Do board structure and compensation matter for bank stability and bank performance? Evidence from European banks," MPRA Paper 95776, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Rachita Gulati, 2022. "Does regulatory under‐compliance with governance standards lead to bank instability? An exploration using Indian data," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 138-180, March.
    11. Miranda Tanjung, 2020. "A cross-firm analysis of corporate governance compliance and performance in Indonesia," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(5), pages 621-643, February.
    12. Zuraidah Mohd-Sanusi & Shayan Motjaba-Nia & Nurul A. Roosle & Ria N. Sari & Agus Harjitok, 2017. "Effects of Corporate Governance Structures on Enterprise Risk Management Practices in Malaysia," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 6-13.
    13. Alharbi, Rana & Elnahass, Marwa & McLaren, Josie, 2022. "Women directors and market valuation: What are the “Wonder Woman” attributes in banking?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. Mehmet Maksud Onal & John K. Ashton, 2021. "Is the Journey more Important than the Destination? EU Accession and Corporate Governance and Performance of Banks," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1516-1535, November.
    15. Gundula Glowka & Andreas Kallmünzer & Anita Zehrer, 2021. "Enterprise risk management in small and medium family enterprises: the role of family involvement and CEO tenure," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1213-1231, September.
    16. Owen, Ann L. & Temesvary, Judit, 2018. "The performance effects of gender diversity on bank boards," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 50-63.
    17. Mollah, Sabur & Zaman, Mahbub, 2015. "Shari’ah supervision, corporate governance and performance: Conventional vs. Islamic banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 418-435.
    18. Rubén Chavarín, 2020. "Risk governance, banks affiliated to business groups, and foreign ownership," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 1-37, March.
    19. Ichiro Iwasaki, 2015. "Global Financial Crisis, Ownership Change, and Corporate Governance Evolution Firm-Level Evidence from Russia," KIER Working Papers 925, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    20. Danisman, Gamze Ozturk & Tarazi, Amine, 2024. "ESG activity and bank lending during financial crises," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:328-:d:1447368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.