IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3816-d1074428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fractal Characterization of Brass Corrosion in Cavitation Field in Seawater

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Bărbulescu

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Transilvania University of Brașov, 5, Turnului Street, 900152 Brașov, Romania)

  • Cristian Ștefan Dumitriu

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics in Constructions, Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest, 122, Lacul Tei Av., 020396 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Cavitation is a physical process that produces complex effects on the machines and components working in conditions where it acts. One effect is the materials-mass loss by corrosion–erosion when components are introduced into fluids under cavitation. The analysis of the damages produced by cavitation is generally performed by using different destructive and non-destructive experimental techniques. Most studies on materials’ behavior in cavitation refer to the erosion–corrosion mechanism, and very few investigate the fissure propagation by fractal methods. None have investigated the fractal characteristics of the sample surface after erosion–corrosion or the multifractal characteristics of materials’ mass variation in time in a cavitation field. Therefore, this research proposes a computational approach to determine the pattern of materials’ damages produced by ultrasound cavitation. The studied material is a brass, introduced in seawater. Fractal and multifractal techniques are applied to the series of the absolute mass loss per surface and the sample’s micrography after corrosion. Such an approach has not been utilized for such a material in similar experimental conditions. This study emphasizes that the box dimension of the series of the absolute mass loss per surface is close to one, and its behaviour is close to a non-/monofractal. It is demonstrated that the material’s surface corrosion is not uniform, and its multifractal character is highlighted by the f( α ) − spectrum and the multifractal dimensions, which have the following values: the capacity dimension = 1.5969, the information dimension = 1.49836, and the correlation dimension = 1.4670.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Bărbulescu & Cristian Ștefan Dumitriu, 2023. "Fractal Characterization of Brass Corrosion in Cavitation Field in Seawater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3816-:d:1074428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3816/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3816/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yidong Xu & Chunxiang Qian & Lei Pan & Bingbing Wang & Chi Lou, 2012. "Comparing Monofractal and Multifractal Analysis of Corrosion Damage Evolution in Reinforcing Bars," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, January.
    2. S. Davies & P. Hall, 1999. "Fractal analysis of surface roughness by using spatial data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(1), pages 3-37.
    3. López, J.L. & Veleva, L., 2022. "2D-DFA as a tool for non-destructive characterisation of copper surface exposed to substitute ocean water," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 586(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Yang & Baibai Fu, 2023. "Spatial Heterogeneity of Urban Road Network Fractal Characteristics and Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Ying & Chang, Xiaohui & Guan, Yongtao, 2018. "Flexible and efficient estimating equations for variogram estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 45-58.
    2. Myoungji Lee & Marc G. Genton & Mikyoung Jun, 2016. "Testing Self-Similarity Through Lamperti Transformations," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(3), pages 426-447, September.
    3. Gneiting, Tilmann, 2002. "Compactly Supported Correlation Functions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 493-508, November.
    4. Lim, S.C. & Teo, L.P., 2009. "Gaussian fields and Gaussian sheets with generalized Cauchy covariance structure," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 119(4), pages 1325-1356, April.
    5. Hong, Yiping & Zhou, Zaiying & Yang, Ying, 2020. "Hypothesis testing for the smoothness parameter of Matérn covariance model on a regular grid," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Sönmez, Ercan, 2018. "The Hausdorff dimension of multivariate operator-self-similar Gaussian random fields," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 426-444.
    7. Kristoufek, Ladislav & Vosvrda, Miloslav, 2014. "Commodity futures and market efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 50-57.
    8. Mikkel Bennedsen, 2016. "Semiparametric inference on the fractal index of Gaussian and conditionally Gaussian time series data," Papers 1608.01895, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    9. Wu, Dongsheng & Xiao, Yimin, 2009. "Continuity in the Hurst index of the local times of anisotropic Gaussian random fields," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 119(6), pages 1823-1844, June.
    10. Ladislav Kristoufek & Miloslav Vosvrda, 2014. "Measuring capital market efficiency: long-term memory, fractal dimension and approximate entropy," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 87(7), pages 1-9, July.
    11. Kenneth J. Falconer, 2002. "Tangent Fields and the Local Structure of Random Fields," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 731-750, July.
    12. Mikkel Bennedsen, 2016. "Semiparametric inference on the fractal index of Gaussian and conditionally Gaussian time series data," CREATES Research Papers 2016-21, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    13. Li, Ming, 2017. "Record length requirement of long-range dependent teletraffic," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 472(C), pages 164-187.
    14. Feodor M. Borodich & Andrey Pepelyshev & Xiaoqing Jin, 2024. "A Multiscale Statistical Analysis of Rough Surfaces and Applications to Tribology," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    15. J. Beirlant & A. Berlinet & G. Biau, 2008. "Higher order estimation at Lebesgue points," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 60(3), pages 651-677, September.
    16. Ben Slimane, Mourad & Alzughaibi, Imtithal & Algahtani, Obaid, 2024. "On Lp rectangular multifractal multivariate functions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    17. Bertaglia, Marco & Joost, Stephane & Roosen, Jutta, 2007. "Identifying European marginal areas in the context of local sheep and goat breeds conservation: A geographic information system approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 657-670, June.
    18. Li, Yuqiang & Xiao, Yimin, 2011. "Multivariate operator-self-similar random fields," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 121(6), pages 1178-1200, June.
    19. Li, Ming & Li, Jia-Yue, 2017. "Generalized Cauchy model of sea level fluctuations with long-range dependence," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 484(C), pages 309-335.
    20. George P. Papaioannou & Christos Dikaiakos & Akylas C. Stratigakos & Panos C. Papageorgiou & Konstantinos F. Krommydas, 2019. "Testing the Efficiency of Electricity Markets Using a New Composite Measure Based on Nonlinear TS Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-30, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3816-:d:1074428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.