IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1932-d1041532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupants’ Perceptions of Comfort, Control, and Adaptation in Colonial Revival Style Residences

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy O. Adekunle

    (School of Architecture, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

Abstract

This study examines occupants’ perceptions of comfort, control, and adaptation in Colonial Revival style residences in the “Building America Climate” cold region of the United States. The research considered these buildings due to their attractiveness and availability in the study area. The research intends to address the following question—Do occupants’ perceptions of comfort significantly impact their perceptions of control and adaptation within the buildings? This study utilized indoor monitoring of variables in the summer, thermal comfort surveys (110 respondents), walk-throughs, observations, and informal interviews to collect data for analysis. The residents that perceived higher air movement and humidity also use control more often and are more often satisfied with the level of control. The differences between the mean neutral temperatures were within the range of 2.2 °C. On a seven-point scale, the mean thermal sensation votes (TSV) and thermal comfort (TC) were 3.25 and 5.05, respectively. The study revealed higher perceptions of the thermal environment among residents who spent longer hours in the buildings than those that spent fewer hours within the residences. The research implies that while there are limited options for control, the residents who spent longer hours in the buildings perceived themselves to be more comfortable and to be able to adapt better using available adaptive measures than those who spent fewer hours in the residences. The study notes that, as people migrate from one thermal environment to another, their adaptation level may change depending on certain factors, including the adaptive measures available to them. The research recommends the integration of transitional smart devices (such as remotely controlled thermostats, etc.), including control for the residents who spent fewer hours in those buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy O. Adekunle, 2023. "Occupants’ Perceptions of Comfort, Control, and Adaptation in Colonial Revival Style Residences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1932-:d:1041532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1932/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1932/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yao, Runming & Liu, Jing & Li, Baizhan, 2010. "Occupants' adaptive responses and perception of thermal environment in naturally conditioned university classrooms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 1015-1022, March.
    2. Timothy O. Adekunle, 2021. "Indoor Comfort, Thermal Indices, and Energy Assessment of Multi-Family Colonial Revival Style Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Shady Attia, 2020. "Spatial and Behavioral Thermal Adaptation in Net Zero Energy Buildings: An Exploratory Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Kosiński & Aldona Skotnicka-Siepsiak, 2022. "Possibilities of Adapting the University Lecture Room to the Green University Standard in Terms of Thermal Comfort and Ventilation Accuracy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Wang, Zhe & Hong, Tianzhen, 2020. "Learning occupants’ indoor comfort temperature through a Bayesian inference approach for office buildings in United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Attia, Shady & Canonge, Théophile & Popineau, Mathieu & Cuchet, Mathilde, 2022. "Developing a benchmark model for renovated, nearly zero-energy, terraced dwellings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    4. Łukasz J. Orman & Grzegorz Majewski & Norbert Radek & Jacek Pietraszek, 2022. "Analysis of Thermal Comfort in Intelligent and Traditional Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Jonghoon Ahn, 2020. "Improvement of the Performance Balance between Thermal Comfort and Energy Use for a Building Space in the Mid-Spring Season," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Ren, Zhengen & Chen, Dong, 2018. "Modelling study of the impact of thermal comfort criteria on housing energy use in Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 152-166.
    7. Turhan, Cihan & Simani, Silvio & Gokcen Akkurt, Gulden, 2021. "Development of a personalized thermal comfort driven controller for HVAC systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    8. Daoru Liu & Zhigang Ren & Shen Wei & Zhe Song & Peipeng Li & Xin Chen, 2019. "Investigations on the Winter Thermal Environment of Bedrooms in Zhongxiang: A Case Study in Rural Areas in Hot Summer and Cold Winter Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Li, Y. & Arulnathan, V. & Heidari, M.D. & Pelletier, N., 2022. "Design considerations for net zero energy buildings for intensive, confined poultry production: A review of current insights, knowledge gaps, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Liang, Han-Hsi & Lin, Tzu-Ping & Hwang, Ruey-Lung, 2012. "Linking occupants’ thermal perception and building thermal performance in naturally ventilated school buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 355-363.
    11. Yun, Geun Young & Steemers, Koen, 2011. "Behavioural, physical and socio-economic factors in household cooling energy consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2191-2200, June.
    12. Rana Elnaklah & Yara Ayyad & Saba Alnusairat & Husam AlWaer & Abdulsalam AlShboul, 2023. "A Comparison of Students’ Thermal Comfort and Perceived Learning Performance between Two Types of University Halls: Architecture Design Studios and Ordinary Lecture Rooms during the Heating Season," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-28, January.
    13. Xinzhi Gong & Qinglin Meng & Yilei Yu, 2021. "A Field Study on Thermal Comfort in Multi-Storey Residential Buildings in the Karst Area of Guilin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Chen, Yujiao & Tong, Zheming & Wu, Wentao & Samuelson, Holly & Malkawi, Ali & Norford, Leslie, 2019. "Achieving natural ventilation potential in practice: Control schemes and levels of automation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1141-1152.
    15. Zhang, Sheng & Lin, Zhang, 2020. "Standard effective temperature based adaptive-rational thermal comfort model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    16. Reihaneh Aram & Halil Zafer Alibaba, 2019. "Thermal Comfort and Energy Performance of Atrium in Mediterranean Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-29, February.
    17. Mohamed Elhadi Matallah & Djamel Alkama & Jacques Teller & Atef Ahriz & Shady Attia, 2021. "Quantification of the Outdoor Thermal Comfort within Different Oases Urban Fabrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    18. Yang, Liu & Yan, Haiyan & Lam, Joseph C., 2014. "Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 164-173.
    19. Mohamed Elhadi Matallah & Waqas Ahmed Mahar & Mushk Bughio & Djamel Alkama & Atef Ahriz & Soumia Bouzaher, 2021. "Prediction of Climate Change Effect on Outdoor Thermal Comfort in Arid Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    20. Zomorodian, Zahra Sadat & Tahsildoost, Mohammad & Hafezi, Mohammadreza, 2016. "Thermal comfort in educational buildings: A review article," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 895-906.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1932-:d:1041532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.