IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1892-d1040503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treatment of Agricultural Waste Using a Combination of Anaerobic, Aerobic, and Adsorption Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Kyriaki Trouli

    (Center of Materials Technology and Photonics, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 714 10 Heraklion, Greece)

  • Spyros Dokianakis

    (Center of Materials Technology and Photonics, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 714 10 Heraklion, Greece)

  • Evangelia Vasilaki

    (Center of Materials Technology and Photonics, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 714 10 Heraklion, Greece)

  • Nikos Katsarakis

    (Center of Materials Technology and Photonics, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 714 10 Heraklion, Greece)

Abstract

The generation of waste in agricultural and livestock industries, followed by inadequate treatment and uncontrolled disposal to natural recipients, results in significant environmental pollution. Thus, the efficient and integrated management of high-organic-load waste produced in such activities is a key factor for sustainability and the protection of aqueous matrices. In this work, we investigate an integrated management approach for the treatment of agricultural, high-organic-load waste via a combination of processes, with an ultimate goal to improve the characteristics of the final waste and enhance the valorization of the nutrients contained in it. Towards this direction, a waste mixture comprising pig waste, cheese dairy, and food residues was sequentially treated in a laboratory scale by anaerobic digestion, followed by activated sludge (aerobic–anoxic treatment), and last by adsorption using natural zeolite. The efficiency of two different adsorption routes was examined (magnetically agitated zeolite or packed zeolite column), while the effect of the granule sizes of zeolite (0–1 mm or 1.5–3 mm) was also evaluated with regards to the remediation of the final effluent. Excellent adsorption capacities were observed in all cases, with the larger-sized zeolite exhibiting a superior performance, while the granule size of zeolite significantly affected the lifetime of the packed columns, as the smaller-sized zeolite columns reached their saturation point faster than the larger-sized zeolite analogue. The average ammonium nitrogen removal in the column experiment was ~92%, while total phosphorus was ~68%, respectively. Overall, an almost complete remediation of the final effluent was observed when compared with the physicochemical parameters of the initial waste, with a ~96% chemical oxygen demand, ~79% total nitrogen, ~96% total phosphorus, and ~82% phenols concentration decrease, signifying the high performance of the sequential treatment strategy proposed herein.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyriaki Trouli & Spyros Dokianakis & Evangelia Vasilaki & Nikos Katsarakis, 2023. "Treatment of Agricultural Waste Using a Combination of Anaerobic, Aerobic, and Adsorption Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1892-:d:1040503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1892/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1892/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Calbry-Muzyka, Adelaide & Madi, Hossein & Rüsch-Pfund, Florian & Gandiglio, Marta & Biollaz, Serge, 2022. "Biogas composition from agricultural sources and organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1000-1007.
    2. Alexandros Yfantis & Nikos Yfantis & Triantafyllia Angelakopoulou & George Giannakakis & Fabien Michelet & Spyros Dokianakis & Evangelia Vasilaki & Nikos Katsarakis, 2022. "Industrial Pilot for Assessment of Polymeric and Ceramic Membrane Efficiency in Treatment of Liquid Digestate from Biogas Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Bipasyana Dhungana & Sunil Prasad Lohani & Michael Marsolek, 2022. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste with Livestock Manure at Ambient Temperature: A Biogas Based Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wojciech Rzeźnik & Ilona Rzeźnik & Paulina Mielcarek-Bocheńska & Mateusz Urbański, 2023. "Air Pollutants Emission during Co-Combustion of Animal Manure and Wood Pellets in 15 kW Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Wendelin Wichtmann & Grzegorz Zając & Piotr Banaszuk, 2023. "Common Reed and Maize Silage Co-Digestion as a Pathway towards Sustainable Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Mohammadpour, Hossein & Cord-Ruwisch, Ralf & Pivrikas, Almantas & Ho, Goen, 2022. "Simple energy-efficient electrochemically-driven CO2 scrubbing for biogas upgrading," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 274-282.
    4. Giuseppe Craparo & Elisa Isabel Cano Montero & Jesús Fernando Santos Peñalver, 2024. "Trends in the circular economy applied to the agricultural sector in the framework of the SDGs," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26699-26729, October.
    5. Yongping Li & Jiaoning Zhu & Yun Tang & Xiangyuan Shi & Sumera Anwar & Juanling Wang & Li Gao & Jingxuan Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Varying Mass Concentrations of Ammonia Nitrogen on Biogas Production and System Stability of Anaerobic Fermentation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Tsipis, E.V. & Agarkov, D.A. & Borisov, Yu.A. & Kiseleva, S.V. & Tarasenko, A.B. & Bredikhin, S.I. & Kharton, V.V., 2023. "Waste gas utilization potential for solid oxide fuel cells: A brief review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Isabela Gomes Barreto da Motta & Larice Aparecida Rezende Santana & Hyago Passe Pereira & Vanessa Romário de Paula & Marta Fonseca Martins & Jailton da Costa Carneiro & Marcelo Henrique Otenio, 2022. "Population Dynamics of Methanogenic Archea in Co-Digestion Systems Operating Different Industrial Residues for Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Gandiglio, Marta, 2022. "Design and operation of an industrial size adsorption-based cleaning system for biogas use in fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    9. Chaves, Gustavo T. & Teles, Felipe & Balbo, Antonio R. & dos Reis, Célia A. & Florentino, Helenice de Oliveira, 2024. "Mathematical modelling of biodigestion in an Indian biodigester and its stability analysis via Lyapunov technique," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    10. Orlando Corigliano & Marco Iannuzzi & Crescenzo Pellegrino & Francesco D’Amico & Leonardo Pagnotta & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2023. "Enhancing Energy Processes and Facilities Redesign in an Anaerobic Digestion Plant for Biomethane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, August.
    11. Vannucci, Julián A. & Gatti, Martín N. & Cardaci, Nicolas & Nichio, Nora N., 2022. "Economic feasibility of a solketal production process from glycerol at small industrial scale," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 540-547.
    12. Sławomir Łazarski & Andrzej Butarewicz & Marcin Cichosz & Urszula Kiełkowska, 2023. "Study on the Effect of Dedicated Microelement Mixture (DMM) on the Kick-Off Phase of the Digester and Stabilization of the Methane Fermentation Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Mukherjee, Agneev & Bruijnincx, Pieter & Junginger, Martin, 2023. "Techno-economic competitiveness of renewable fuel alternatives in the marine sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Tiwari, Prince & Wang, Tiantian & Indlekofer, Julian & El Haddad, Imad & Biollaz, Serge & Prevot, Andre Stephan Henry & Lamkaddam, Houssni, 2022. "Online detection of trace volatile organic sulfur compounds in a complex biogas mixture with proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1197-1203.
    15. Marie-Noël Mansour & Thomas Lendormi & Nicolas Louka & Richard G. Maroun & Zeina Hobaika & Jean-Louis Lanoisellé, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Poultry Droppings in Semi-Continuous Mode and Effect of Their Co-Digestion with Physico-Chemical Sludge on Methane Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Sica, Daniela & Esposito, Benedetta & Supino, Stefania & Malandrino, Ornella & Sessa, Maria Rosaria, 2023. "Biogas-based systems: An opportunity towards a post-fossil and circular economy perspective in Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Francesco Zito, Pasquale & Brunetti, Adele & Barbieri, Giuseppe, 2022. "Renewable biomethane production from biogas upgrading via membrane separation: Experimental analysis and multistep configuration design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 777-787.
    18. Marco Cavana & Pierluigi Leone, 2022. "Smart Gas Network with Linepack Managing to Increase Biomethane Injection at the Distribution Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Malhotra, Milan & Aboudi, Kaoutar & Pisharody, Lakshmi & Singh, Ayush & Banu, J. Rajesh & Bhatia, Shashi Kant & Varjani, Sunita & Kumar, Sunil & González-Fernández, Cristina & Kumar, Sumant & Singh, R, 2022. "Biorefinery of anaerobic digestate in a circular bioeconomy: Opportunities, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    20. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk, 2022. "Importance of Feedstock in a Small-Scale Agricultural Biogas Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1892-:d:1040503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.