IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1646-d1035878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of the Sustainability of the Urban Water Resources of Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture, China

Author

Listed:
  • Teng Gao

    (Department of Geography, College of Geography and Ocean Sciences, Yanbian University, Yanji 133000, China)

  • Mingye Zhang

    (Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China)

  • Chunzi Zhao

    (Department of Geography, College of Geography and Ocean Sciences, Yanbian University, Yanji 133000, China
    Department of Geography, College of Integration Science, Yanbian University, Yanji 133000, China)

Abstract

The availability of water resources is crucial to maintaining the sustainability of urbanization. Calculating the ecological footprint of water ( EF W ) is one of the ways to realize the protection of water resources in the process of urbanization. The minor settlements in border areas have been the focus of China’s urbanization development but have rarely received research attention. The objective of this study was to develop an improved model of the ecological footprint of water ( EF W ) to assess the water security status of urban areas in Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture (YKAP), and to demonstrate its authenticity compared with the traditional ecological footprint of water ( EF W ). The results showed that water pollution is the main reason for the increase in the EF W in each city, and the ecological water carrying capacity ( EC W ) showed strong fluctuations with the interannual variation in precipitation. Although the overall availability and quality of water resources are within safe limits, there are significant differences among cities, and water pollution poses a direct threat to the health and well-being of urban dwellers in some cities. Therefore, it is recommended that water resource management agencies adjust their water supply strategies based on the data from the EF W model, control wastewater discharge, improve their management systems and take urban economic development into account. This will significantly improve the sustainable management of water resources and ensure the health and well-being of urban residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Teng Gao & Mingye Zhang & Chunzi Zhao, 2023. "An Evaluation of the Sustainability of the Urban Water Resources of Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1646-:d:1035878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1646/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1646/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jae Min Lee & Eun Hye Kwon & Nam C. Woo, 2019. "Natural and Human-Induced Drivers of Groundwater Sustainability: A Case Study of the Mangyeong River Basin in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Willa Paterson & Richard Rushforth & Benjamin L. Ruddell & Megan Konar & Ikechukwu C. Ahams & Jorge Gironás & Ana Mijic & Alfonso Mejia, 2015. "Water Footprint of Cities: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-30, June.
    3. Yin, Jieling & Wu, Nan & Engel, Bernie A. & Hua, En & Zhang, Fuyao & Li, Xin & Wang, Yubao, 2022. "Multi-dimensional evaluation of water footprint and implication for crop production: A case study in Hetao Irrigation District, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    4. Wackernagel, Mathis & Rees, William E., 1997. "Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: Economics from an ecological footprint perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 3-24, January.
    5. Madhu Sachidananda & D. Patrick Webb & Shahin Rahimifard, 2016. "A Concept of Water Usage Efficiency to Support Water Reduction in Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Hatem Jemmali, 2017. "Mapping water poverty in Africa using the improved Multidimensional Index of Water Poverty," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 649-666, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gang Kou & Serhat Yüksel & Hasan Dinçer & Mohammed A.Hefni, 2024. "Integrated approach for sustainable development and investment goals: analyzing environmental issues in European economies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 429-475, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalie Slawinski & Jonatan Pinkse & Timo Busch & Subhabrata Bobby Banerjeed, 2014. "The role of short-termism and uncertainty in organizational inaction on climate change: multilevel framework," Working Papers hal-00961226, HAL.
    2. Rodrigues, João & Domingos, Tiago & Conceição, Pedro & Belbute, José, 2005. "Constraints on dematerialisation and allocation of natural capital along a sustainable growth path," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 382-396, September.
    3. Alcott, Blake, 2008. "The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 770-786, February.
    4. Chen, B. & Chen, G.Q., 2007. "Modified ecological footprint accounting and analysis based on embodied exergy--a case study of the Chinese society 1981-2001," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 355-376, March.
    5. Karen Turner, 2006. "Additional precision provided by region-specific data: The identification of fuel-use and pollution-generation coefficients in the Jersey economy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 347-364.
    6. Malayaranjan Sahoo & Narayan Sethi, 2022. "The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: evidence from newly industrialized countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4244-4277, March.
    7. Arup Roy & Ranjan DasGupta, 2024. "Economic Development, Energy Consumption, and Environmental Deterioration: A Non-Linear Evidence from India," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 22(3), pages 721-747, September.
    8. Martin C. Whitby & W. Neil Adger, 1997. "Natural And Reproducible Capital And The Sustainability Of Land Use In The Uk: A Reply," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1‐3), pages 454-458, January.
    9. Korhonen, Jouni & Snakin, Juha-Pekka, 2005. "Analysing the evolution of industrial ecosystems: concepts and application," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 169-186, January.
    10. Suranjan Sinha & Surajit Chakraborty & Shatrajit Goswami, 2017. "Ecological footprint: an indicator of environmental sustainability of a surface coal mine," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 807-824, June.
    11. Dimitropoulos, John, 2007. "Energy productivity improvements and the rebound effect: An overview of the state of knowledge," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 6354-6363, December.
    12. Prudence Dato, 2018. "Investment in Energy Efficiency, Adoption of Renewable Energy and Household Behavior: Evidence from OECD Countries," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    13. Lu, Yanhua & Yan, Lijuan & Li, Jie & Liang, Yunliang & Yang, Chuanjie & Li, Guang & Wu, Jiangqi & Xu, Hua, 2024. "Spatiotemporal evolution of county level ecological security based on an emergy ecological footprint model: The case of Dingxi, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    14. Seo, Kami & Taylor, Jonathan, 2003. "Forest resource trade between Japan and Southeast Asia: the structure of dual decay," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 91-104, April.
    15. Xin Yang & Fan Zhang & Cheng Luo & Anlu Zhang, 2019. "Farmland Ecological Compensation Zoning and Horizontal Fiscal Payment Mechanism in Wuhan Agglomeration, China, From the Perspective of Ecological Footprint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    16. -, 2022. "Innovation for development: The key to a transformative recovery in Latin America and the Caribbean," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 47795 edited by Eclac.
    17. Rachit Saxena & Sai Kranthi Vanga & Jin Wang & Valérie Orsat & Vijaya Raghavan, 2018. "Millets for Food Security in the Context of Climate Change: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-31, June.
    18. Timo Busch, 2020. "Industrial ecology, climate adaptation, and financial risk," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(2), pages 285-290, April.
    19. Rachel Slocum, 2004. "Consumer Citizens and the Cities for Climate Protection Campaign," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(5), pages 763-782, May.
    20. Ang, Frederic & Van Passel, Steven & Mathijs, Erik, 2011. "An aggregate resource efficiency perspective on sustainability: A Sustainable Value application to the EU-15 countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 99-110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1646-:d:1035878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.