IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1229-d1029883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data-Driven-Based Eco Approach for Connected and Automated Articulated Trucks in the Space Domain

Author

Listed:
  • Xianhong Zhang

    (Shanghai Utopilot Technology Company Ltd., Shanghai 200082, China)

  • Xiaoyun Li

    (Shanghai Utopilot Technology Company Ltd., Shanghai 200082, China)

  • Zihan Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

Abstract

Since conventional eco approach systems can only achieve longitudinal automation, they may be disabled due to the impedance of the slow-moving vehicle. In addition, they could sacrifice a lot in travel time and it is hard to control the articulated truck with a complex dynamic model. This research presents an enhanced eco approach system for connected and automated articulated trucks, and is able to: (i) overtake slow-moving vehicles for sustainability and mobility; (ii) efficiently optimize the travel duration approaching a signalized intersection; (iii) achieve the trade-off between fuel saving and vehicle mobility; and (iv) improve computational efficiency and optimality for the articulated truck control. To achieve these features, the problem was formulated as an optimal control problem. A longitudinal and lateral coupled truck dynamic model was utilized for enabling the truck to own the automatic overtaking capability. The data-driven-based Koopman operator theory was adopted to globally linearize the truck dynamic model for reducing the computational burden while ensuring optimality. The optimal control problem is transformed from the time domain to the space domain in order for optimizing travel duration and considering the signal timing constraint. A quantitative evaluation was conducted to validate the performance of the Koopman system dynamics. In addition, the simulation experiment was designed to compare the proposed controller against human drivers and the conventional eco approach, which only has longitudinal automation. The results demonstrate that the proposed controller improves the fuel efficiency by 5.12–67.15%, and outperforms the two baseline controllers by 9.09–32.65% in terms of fuel saving. This range is caused by the different arrival times of the ego articulated truck.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianhong Zhang & Xiaoyun Li & Zihan Zhang, 2023. "Data-Driven-Based Eco Approach for Connected and Automated Articulated Trucks in the Space Domain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1229-:d:1029883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1229/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1229/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barkenbus, Jack N., 2010. "Eco-driving: An overlooked climate change initiative," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 762-769, February.
    2. Chen, Chieh & Tomizuka, Masayoshi, 1997. "Modeling And Control Of Articulated Vehicles," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2k64h8k3, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed, Sumayyah & Sanguinetti, Angela, 2015. "OBDEnergy: Making Metrics Meaningful in Eco-driving Feedback," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0x73t2jw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Pietro Stabile & Federico Ballo & Giorgio Previati & Giampiero Mastinu & Massimiliano Gobbi, 2023. "Eco-Driving Strategy Implementation for Ultra-Efficient Lightweight Electric Vehicles in Realistic Driving Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Nan, Sirui & Tu, Ran & Li, Tiezhu & Sun, Jian & Chen, Haibo, 2022. "From driving behavior to energy consumption: A novel method to predict the energy consumption of electric bus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    4. Yuan, Weichang & Frey, H. Christopher, 2020. "Potential for metro rail energy savings and emissions reduction via eco-driving," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    5. Geir H. M. Bjertnæs, 2019. "Efficient taxation of fuel and road use," Discussion Papers 905, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    6. Echeverría, Lucía & Gimenez-Nadal, J. Ignacio & Molina, José Alberto, 2021. "Carpooling: User profiles and well-being," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3568, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    7. Breno Tostes de Gomes Garcia & Diana Mery Messias Lopes & Ilton Curty Leal Junior & José Carlos Cesar Amorim & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva & Vanessa de Almeida Guimarães, 2019. "Analysis of the Performance of Transporting Soybeans from Mato Grosso for Export: A Case Study of the Tapajós-Teles Pires Waterway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, November.
    8. Xie, Shaobo & Lang, Kun & Qi, Shanwei, 2020. "Aerodynamic-aware coordinated control of following speed and power distribution for hybrid electric trucks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. Nikoleta Mikušová & Gabriel Fedorko & Vieroslav Molnár & Martina Hlatká & Rudolf Kampf & Veronika Sirková, 2021. "Possibility of a Solution of the Sustainability of Transport and Mobility with the Application of Discrete Computer Simulation—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Strömberg, Helena & Karlsson, I.C. MariAnne & Rexfelt, Oskar, 2015. "Eco-driving: Drivers’ understanding of the concept and implications for future interventions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 48-54.
    11. Nurul Hidayah Muslim & Ali Keyvanfar & Arezou Shafaghat & Mu’azu Mohammed Abdullahi & Majid Khorami, 2018. "Green Driver: Travel Behaviors Revisited on Fuel Saving and Less Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-30, January.
    12. Frank Meissner & Armin Haas & Jochen Hinkel & Alexander Bisaro, 2020. "A typology for analysing mitigation and adaptation win-win strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 539-564, June.
    13. Juliet Namukasa & Sheila Namagembe & Faridah Nakayima, 2020. "Fuel Efficiency Vehicle Adoption and Carbon Emissions in a Country Context," International Journal of Global Sustainability, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Tianni Wang & Mark Ching-Pong Poo & Adolf K. Y. Ng & Zaili Yang, 2023. "Adapting to the Impacts Posed by Climate Change: Applying the Climate Change Risk Indicator (CCRI) Framework in a Multi-Modal Transport System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Montag, Josef, 2015. "The simple economics of motor vehicle pollution: A case for fuel tax," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 138-149.
    16. Aurélien Saussay, 2019. "Dynamic heterogeneity: rational habits and the heterogeneity of household responses to gasoline prices," Post-Print hal-03632598, HAL.
    17. Carvalho, Irene & Baier, Thomas & Simoes, Ricardo & Silva, Arlindo, 2012. "Reducing fuel consumption through modular vehicle architectures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 556-563.
    18. Vaezipour, Atiyeh & Rakotonirainy, Andry & Haworth, Narelle & Delhomme, Patricia, 2018. "A simulator evaluation of in-vehicle human machine interfaces for eco-safe driving," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 696-713.
    19. Dong, Haoxuan & Zhuang, Weichao & Chen, Boli & Wang, Yan & Lu, Yanbo & Liu, Ying & Xu, Liwei & Yin, Guodong, 2022. "A comparative study of energy-efficient driving strategy for connected internal combustion engine and electric vehicles at signalized intersections," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    20. Mostafa Shahen & Koji Kotani & Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2020. "Does perspective-taking promote intergenerational sustainability?," Working Papers SDES-2020-12, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Sep 2020.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1229-:d:1029883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.