IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1176-d1028928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Sustainable Development of Enterprises That Evoke Industrial Heritage—A Case Study of Taoxichuan

Author

Listed:
  • Zebo Ni

    (School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Taohua Ouyang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Jianxiong Xu

    (School of Management and Economics, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen 333002, China)

Abstract

This paper takes Taoxichuan Cultural and Creative Street as a case study. It explores how enterprises activate the value of “industrial heritage” resources and achieve sustainable development from the perspective of affordance theory. Research findings indicated that: (1) the creation of a culturally recognized context performs a vital role in activating the industrial heritage; (2) the evocation of industrial heritage resources is a dynamic process from the realization of fundamental values to the actualization of high-level values; and (3) the evoked industrial heritage resources can achieve sustainable corporate development. Additionally, the research findings provide reference for enterprises to realize high-level values of industrial heritage resources by creating contexts to transform them into sources of innovation in the post-pandemic era.

Suggested Citation

  • Zebo Ni & Taohua Ouyang & Jianxiong Xu, 2023. "Research on the Sustainable Development of Enterprises That Evoke Industrial Heritage—A Case Study of Taoxichuan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1176-:d:1028928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1176/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1176/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uroš Radosavljević & Aleksandra Đorđević & Kseniјa Lalović & Jelena Živković & Zoran Đukanović, 2019. "Nodes and Networks: The Generative Role of Cultural Heritage for Urban Revival in Kikinda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Giulia Pozzi & Federico Pigni & Claudio Vitari, 2014. "Affordance Theory in the IS Discipline: a Review and Synthesis of the Literature," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01923663, HAL.
    3. Olivier Crevoisier & Hugues Jeannerat, 2009. "Territorial Knowledge Dynamics: From the Proximity Paradigm to Multi-location Milieus," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(8), pages 1223-1241, August.
    4. Xosé Somoza-Medina & Obdulia Monteserín-Abella, 2021. "The Sustainability of Industrial Heritage Tourism Far from the Axes of Economic Development in Europe: Two Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    5. Justin Tan & Mike W. Peng, 2003. "Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(13), pages 1249-1263, December.
    6. Gert-Jan Hospers, 2002. "Industrial Heritage Tourism and Regional Restructuring in the European Union," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 397-404, April.
    7. Deephouse, David L. & Wiseman, Robert M., 2000. "Comparing alternative explanations for accounting risk-return relations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 463-482, August.
    8. repec:nct:journl:v:17:y:2009:i:8:p:1223-1241 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Jörn Harfst & Jasmin Sandriester & Wolfgang Fischer, 2021. "Industrial Heritage Tourism as a Driver of Sustainable Development? A Case Study of Steirische Eisenstrasse (Austria)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Olivier Crevoisier & Hugues Jeannerat, "undated". "Territorial Knowledge Dynamics: From the Proximity Paradigm to Multi-location Milieus," GRET Journal Papers 08-09, GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel.
    11. Antonia Merino-Aranda & Isabel Luisa Castillejo-González & Almudena Velo-Gala & Francisco de Paula Montes-Tubío & Francisco-Javier Mesas-Carrascosa & Paula Triviño-Tarradas, 2021. "Strengthening Efforts to Protect and Safeguard the Industrial Cultural Heritage in Montilla-Moriles (PDO). Characterisation of Historic Wineries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    12. David Byrne, 2002. "Industrial culture in a post-industrial world: The case of the North East of England," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 279-289, November.
    13. Andreea Ionica & Ionela Samuil & Monica Leba & Mihaela Toderas, 2020. "The Path of Petrila Mining Area towards Future Industrial Heritage Tourism Seen through the Lenses of Past and Present," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-32, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui Han & Shiqi Yang, 2023. "A Study on Industrial Heritage Renewal Strategy Based on Hybrid Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Kuzior & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko & Aleksy Kwilinski & Dariusz Krawczyk, 2021. "Post-Industrial Tourism as a Driver of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Kuebart, Andreas & Ibert, Oliver, 2019. "Beyond territorial conceptions of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The dynamic spatiality of knowledge brokering in seed accelerators," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(2-4), pages 118-133.
    3. Rehák Štefan & Hudec Oto & Buček Milan, 2013. "Path dependency and path plasticity in emerging industries: Two cases from Slovakia," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 52-66, October.
    4. Shuai Shi & Kathy Pain, 2020. "Investigating China’s Mid-Yangtze River economic growth region using a spatial network growth model," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2973-2993, November.
    5. Jonas Heiberg & Bernhard Truffer, 2021. "The emergence of a global innovation system – a case study from the water sector," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2021(09), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    6. Ssu-Chi Pan & Tai-Shan Hu & Ben-Zin Chia & Su-Li Chang & Hai-Ping Lin, 2022. "Does Knowledge Evolution Matter? Reflection on Alpine Tribes Industry, Development, and Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Hugues Jeannerat & Leila Kebir, 2012. "Mobility of Knowledge. Knowledge resources and markets: What territorial economic systems ?," GRET Publications and Working Papers 02-12, GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel.
    8. Nathalie Schieb-Bienfait & Anne-Laure Saives & Brigitte Charles-Pauvers & Sandrine Emin & Hélène Morteau, 2018. "Grouping and/or grounding : a closer look at cultural quarters and creative cluster management in Nantes (France)," Post-Print hal-02502524, HAL.
    9. Franz Tödtling & Alexander Auer, 2021. "Knowledge bases, innovation and multi-scalar relationships: which kind of territorial boundedness of industrial clusters?," Chapters, in: Dirk Fornahl & Nils Grashof (ed.), The Globalization of Regional Clusters, chapter 7, pages 163-188, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Christophe Carrincazeaux & Frederic Gaschet, 2015. "Regional Innovation Systems and Economic Performance: Between Regions and Nations," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 262-291, February.
    11. Christophe Carrincazeaux & Frédéric Gaschet, 2006. "Knowledge and the diversity of innovation systems: a comparative analysis of European regions," Post-Print hal-00257384, HAL.
    12. Kebir Leïla & Jeannerat Hugues, 2013. "Creativity, plasticity, quality: on the emergence of a new food offering in Paris," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 27-38, October.
    13. Jonas Heiberg & Christian Binz & Bernhard Truffer, 2020. "The Geography of Technology Legitimation. How multi-scalar legitimation processes matter for path creation in emerging industries," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2034, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    14. Wiersma, Eelke, 2017. "How and when do firms translate slack into better performance?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(5), pages 445-459.
    15. Brita Hermelin & Margareta Dahlström & Lukas Smas, 2014. "Geographies of Knowledge and Learning: The Example of Medical Technology," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 450-470, September.
    16. Franz Tödtling & Markus Grillitsch, 2015. "Does Combinatorial Knowledge Lead to a Better Innovation Performance of Firms?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1741-1758, September.
    17. Strambach Simone & Klement Benjamin, 2013. "Exploring plasticity in the development path of the automotive industry in Baden-Württemberg: the role of combinatorial knowledge dynamics," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 67-82, October.
    18. Martine Gadille & Juan Ramón Gallego-Bono, 2021. "Rebuilding a Cluster While Protecting Knowledge within Low-Medium-Tech Supplier SMEs: A Spanish and French Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-35, October.
    19. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2018. "The dynamics of regional learning paradigms and trajectories," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 727-748, September.
    20. Joan Crespo, 2021. "Agencies, scales and times of path creation: The case of IoT in Toulouse," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 1527-1545, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1176-:d:1028928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.