IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16520-d1293251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Complexity Analysis of R&D Levels in the Automotive Industry under the Dual-Credit Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Qing He

    (School of Economic and Management, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China)

  • Yu Feng

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China)

  • Zheyu Li

    (School of Customs and Public Administration, Shanghai Customs College, Shanghai 201204, China)

Abstract

The dual-credit policy, as an important emerging policy in the Chinese automotive industry intended to achieve energy savings, emissions reductions, and promote the development of new energy vehicles (NEVs), has attracted considerable attention from scholars. This study investigates how this policy affects the research and development (R&D) levels of both component suppliers and vehicle manufacturers in the automotive supply chain. Assuming the bounded rationality of the participants, we construct a complex dynamic evolutionary model under Stackelberg games to explore the impact of the policy on the dynamic game behavior and equilibrium stability of R&D levels. Furthermore, we examine the influences of various parameters on the R&D level complex system. The findings reveal that the disparity in the proportion of NEVs in the policy should not be too large; otherwise, bifurcation and chaos may occur in the R&D level game system. Moreover, higher supplier research efficiency contributes to the stability of R&D levels, while the higher credit trading price is not suitable for stable R&D levels. This paper theoretically reveals the dynamic impact of the dual-credit policy on the R&D levels in the automotive supply chain, bridging the gap between previous studies assuming decision-makers as fully rational and the reality of bounded rationality. It also provides managerial recommendations for the implementation details of this policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing He & Yu Feng & Zheyu Li, 2023. "Dynamic Complexity Analysis of R&D Levels in the Automotive Industry under the Dual-Credit Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16520-:d:1293251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16520/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16520/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruno Cassiman & Reinhilde Veugelers, 1998. "R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence," Economics Working Papers 328, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    2. He, Haonan & Li, Shiqiang & Wang, Shanyong & Zhang, Chaojia & Ma, Fei, 2023. "Value of dual-credit policy: Evidence from green technology innovation efficiency," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 182-198.
    3. Najib Harabi, 2002. "The Impact of Vertical R&D Cooperation on Firm Innovation: An Empirical Investigation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 93-108.
    4. Wang, Yitong & Fan, Ruguo & Du, Kang & Bao, Xuguang, 2023. "Exploring incentives to promote electric vehicles diffusion under subsidy abolition: An evolutionary analysis on multiplex consumer social networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun & Zhou, Mingmei, 2019. "Firms’ green R&D cooperation behaviour in a supply chain: Technological spillover, power and coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 118-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cassiman, Bruno & Perez-Castrillo, David & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2002. "Endogenizing know-how flows through the nature of R&D investments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 775-799, June.
    2. Bertrand, Olivier & Zuniga, Pluvia, 2006. "R&D and M&A: Are cross-border M&A different? An investigation on OECD countries," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 401-423, March.
    3. Mustafa Gomleksiz, 2023. "International Knowledge Spillovers and Economic Growth: New Evidence from High-Tech Imports and R&D Cooperation," Istanbul Journal of Economics-Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 73(73-1), pages 281-305, June.
    4. Karbowski, Adam & Prokop, Jacek, 2019. "The Impact of Vertical R&D Cooperation on Market Performance of Firms," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(4), pages 73-89.
    5. Ornaghi, Carmine, 2006. "Spillovers in product and process innovation: Evidence from manufacturing firms," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 349-380, March.
    6. SUZUKI Jun & TSUKADA Naotoshi & GOTO Akira, 2014. "Innovation and Public Research Institutes: Cases of AIST, RIKEN, and JAXA," Discussion papers 14021, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    7. Tombak, Mihkel & Röller, Lars-Hendrik & Siebert, Ralph, 2000. "Strategic Choice of Partners: Research Joint Ventures and Market Power," CEPR Discussion Papers 2617, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Yu, Yanan & He, Yong & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Impact of demand information sharing on organic farming adoption: An evolutionary game approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    9. Leiponen, Aija, 2002. "Competencies and Firm Performance - Increasing Returns from Knowledge Complementaries?," Discussion Papers 703, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    10. Karbowski, Adam, 2019. "Greed and fear in downstream R&D games," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32, pages 63-76.
    11. Dumont, Michel & Meeusen, Wim, 2000. "Knowledge spillovers through R&D cooperation," MPRA Paper 116454, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. van Moorsel, Daryl & Cranfield, John A.L. & Sparling, David, 2005. "Factors Affecting Biotechnology Innovation in Canada: Analysis of the 2001 Biotechnology Use and Development Survey," Working Papers 34121, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    13. Mariia Shkolnykova & Muhamed Kudic, 2022. "Who benefits from SMEs’ radical innovations?—empirical evidence from German biotechnology," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1157-1185, February.
    14. Rouvinen, Petri, 1999. "Characteristics of Product and Process Innovators among Finnish Manufacturing Firms," Discussion Papers 690, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    15. Hua Cheng & Yinhong Yu & Shiyu Zhang, 2024. "Subsidies, green innovation, and the sustainable performance: evidence from heavy-polluting enterprises in China," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 102-116, March.
    16. Lee, Jun-Yeon & Choi, Sungyong, 2021. "Supply chain investment and contracting for carbon emissions reduction: A social planner's perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Uschi Backes-Gellner & Frank Maass & Arndt Werner, 2005. "On the explanation of horizontal, vertical and cross-sector R&D partnerships – evidence for the German industrial sector," Working Papers 0053, University of Zurich, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics (ISU), revised Mar 2005.
    18. Peter Huber, 2003. "On the Determinants of Cross-border Cooperation of Austrian Firms with Central and Eastern European Partners," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 947-955.
    19. Parisa Pourkarimi & Gamal Atallah, 2020. "Cooperative R&D With Differentiated Products In Vertically Related Industries," Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, University of Tuzla, Faculty of Economics, vol. 18(2), pages 3-16, November.
    20. Xu, Xiaoping & Guo, Shunan & Cheng, T.C.E. & Du, Pengcheng, 2023. "The choice between the agency and reselling modes considering green technology with the cap-and-trade scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16520-:d:1293251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.