IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jenvss/v14y2024i1d10.1007_s13412-023-00875-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subsidies, green innovation, and the sustainable performance: evidence from heavy-polluting enterprises in China

Author

Listed:
  • Hua Cheng

    (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University
    Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)

  • Yinhong Yu

    (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)

  • Shiyu Zhang

    (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)

Abstract

Persistent environmental pollution from heavy-polluting enterprises poses a significant challenge to sustainable economic growth in China. To address this, this study investigates the intricate interplay between government subsidies, green innovation, and the sustainable development performance of 142 listed companies in China’s heavy-polluting industry. Green innovation is assessed on two key dimensions: quantity and quality. The findings reveal a noteworthy link between subsidies and improved financial, environmental, and social performance of these enterprises. Subsidies serve as catalysts for enhancing the green innovation capabilities of these companies, with a slight preference for fostering innovation quality over quantity. Notably, while green innovation positively influences the environmental performance of these enterprises, its impact on economic and social performance remains negative. Crucially, this study shows that green innovation has a mediating effect between subsidies and environmental performance; however, it has “suppressing effects” between subsidies and financial performance, as well as between subsidies and social performance. These results not only contribute to the body of knowledge on the role of subsidies in promoting sustainable development within enterprises but also provide valuable insights for government decision-makers aiming to optimize subsidy programs in the pursuit of greener and more sustainable heavy-polluting industries in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua Cheng & Yinhong Yu & Shiyu Zhang, 2024. "Subsidies, green innovation, and the sustainable performance: evidence from heavy-polluting enterprises in China," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 102-116, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13412-023-00875-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s13412-023-00875-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-023-00875-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13412-023-00875-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susanne Dröge & Philipp Schröder, 2005. "How to Turn an Industry Green: Taxes versus Subsidies," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 177-202, November.
    2. Abiodun Adegbile & David Sarpong & Dirk Meissner, 2017. "Strategic Foresight for Innovation Management: A Review and Research Agenda," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 1-34, August.
    3. Hua-Hung (Robin) Weng & Ja-Shen Chen & Pei-Ching Chen, 2015. "Effects of Green Innovation on Environmental and Corporate Performance: A Stakeholder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-30, April.
    4. Taryn De Mendonca & Yan Zhou, 2019. "What does targeting ecological sustainability mean for company financial performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 1583-1593, December.
    5. Turkan Muge Ozbekler & Yucel Ozturkoglu, 2020. "Analysing the importance of sustainability‐oriented service quality in competition environment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1504-1516, March.
    6. Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Douglas Hanley & William Kerr, 2016. "Transition to Clean Technology," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(1), pages 52-104.
    7. Jung, Seung Hwan & Feng, Tianjun, 2020. "Government subsidies for green technology development under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 726-739.
    8. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    9. Eiadat, Yousef & Kelly, Aidan & Roche, Frank & Eyadat, Hussein, 2008. "Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 131-145, March.
    10. Xie, Xuemei & Huo, Jiage & Zou, Hailiang, 2019. "Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 697-706.
    11. Lisa Melander, 2018. "Customer and Supplier Collaboration in Green Product Innovation: External and Internal Capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 677-693, September.
    12. Peter G. Rötzel & Alexander Stehle & Burkhard Pedell & Katrin Hummel, 2019. "Integrating environmental management control systems to translate environmental strategy into managerial performance," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(4), pages 626-653, November.
    13. Li Li & Jean Chen & Hongli Gao & Li Xie, 2019. "The certification effect of government R&D subsidies on innovative entrepreneurial firms’ access to bank finance: evidence from China," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 241-259, January.
    14. W Walker Hanlon, 2020. "Coal Smoke, City Growth, and the Costs of the Industrial Revolution," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(626), pages 462-488.
    15. Adam B. Jaffe & Gaétan de Rassenfosse, 2017. "Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(6), pages 1360-1374, June.
    16. Harhoff, Dietmar & Scherer, Frederic M. & Vopel, Katrin, 2003. "Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1343-1363, September.
    17. Christopher Marquis & Cuili Qian, 2014. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 127-148, February.
    18. Adam B. Jaffe et al., 1995. "Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 132-163, March.
    19. Yang, Rui & Tang, Wansheng & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2021. "Technology improvement strategy for green products under competition: The role of government subsidy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 553-568.
    20. Dang, Jianwei & Motohashi, Kazuyuki, 2015. "Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 137-155.
    21. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf, 2015. "Supply Chain Consequences of Subsidies for Corporate Social Responsibility," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1346-1357, August.
    22. Sara Ayllón & Dragana Radicic, 2019. "Product innovation, process innovation and export propensity: persistence, complementarities and feedback effects in Spanish firms," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(33), pages 3650-3664, July.
    23. Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun & Zhou, Mingmei, 2019. "Firms’ green R&D cooperation behaviour in a supply chain: Technological spillover, power and coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 118-134.
    24. Yongtao Song & Taiwen Feng & Wenbo Jiang, 2017. "The Influence of Green External Integration on Firm Performance: Does Firm Size Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    25. Jean O. Lanjouw & Mark Schankerman, 2004. "Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 114(495), pages 441-465, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaohui Zhan & Xinrong Lian & Shengli Dai, 2025. "Correcting or Concealing? The Impact of Digital Transformation on the Greenwashing Behavior of Heavily Polluting Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Die Hu & Lu Qiu & Maoyan She & Yu Wang, 2021. "Sustaining the sustainable development: How do firms turn government green subsidies into financial performance through green innovation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2271-2292, July.
    2. Lu Qiu & Die Hu & Yu Wang, 2020. "How do firms achieve sustainability through green innovation under external pressures of environmental regulation and market turbulence?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2695-2714, September.
    3. Ayça Kubra Hizarci‐Payne & İlayda İpek & Gülüzar Kurt Gümüş, 2021. "How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta‐analytic review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1174-1190, February.
    4. Yadav, Sanjeev & Samadhiya, Ashutosh & Kumar, Anil & Luthra, Sunil & Kumar, Vikas & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Upadhyay, Arvind, 2024. "The interplay effects of digital technologies, green integration, and green innovation on food supply chain sustainable performance: An organizational information processing theory perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Adam B. Jaffe, 2018. "Are patent fees effective at weeding out low‐quality patents?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 134-148, March.
    7. Higham, Kyle & de Rassenfosse, Gaetan & Jaffe, Adam B, 2020. "Patent Quality: Towards a Systematic Framework for Analysis and Measurement," SocArXiv 49qxk_v1, Center for Open Science.
    8. Siying Long & Zhongju Liao, 2021. "Are fiscal policy incentives effective in stimulating firms' eco‐product innovation? The moderating role of dynamic capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3095-3104, November.
    9. Zhongju Liao, 2018. "Corporate culture, environmental innovation and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1368-1375, December.
    10. Mercedes Úbeda‐García & Bartolome Marco‐Lajara & Patrocinio C. Zaragoza‐Sáez & Encarnación Manresa‐Marhuenda & Esther Poveda‐Pareja, 2022. "Green ambidexterity and environmental performance: The role of green human resources," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 32-45, January.
    11. Guixiang Cao & Jinghuai She & Chengzi Cao & Qiuxiang Cao, 2024. "Environmental Protection Tax and Green Innovation: The Mediating Role of Digitalization and ESG," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-26, January.
    12. Martin Kalthaus, 2020. "Knowledge recombination along the technology life cycle," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 643-704, July.
    13. Yu Zhang & Yajuan Wang, 2022. "Do Managerial Ties Help or Hinder Corporate Green Innovation? The Moderating Roles of Contextual Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Giudice, Manlio Del & Chierici, Roberto & Graziano, Domenico, 2020. "Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    15. Bhat, Aijaz Ahmad & Mir, Ajaz Akber & Allie, Adeel Hussain & Ahmad Lone, Mushtaq & Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed & Jamali, Dima & Riyaz, Iqra, 2024. "Unlocking corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: Mediating role of green strategy, innovation, and leadership," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(2).
    16. Mariani, Manuel Sebastian & Medo, Matúš & Lafond, François, 2019. "Early identification of important patents: Design and validation of citation network metrics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 644-654.
    17. Yu, Chin-Hsien & Wu, Xiuqin & Zhang, Dayong & Chen, Shi & Zhao, Jinsong, 2021. "Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    18. Leila Tahmooresnejad & Catherine Beaudry, 2019. "Capturing the economic value of triadic patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 127-157, January.
    19. Huang, Kenneth Guang-Lih & Huang, Can & Shen, Huijun & Mao, Hao, 2021. "Assessing the value of China's patented inventions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    20. Fernández, Ana María & Ferrándiz, Esther & Medina, Jennifer, 2022. "The diffusion of energy technologies. Evidence from renewable, fossil, and nuclear energy patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13412-023-00875-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.