IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16336-d1288611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Circular Economy Potential of Modular Construction in Developing Economies—A Life Cycle Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Janappriya Jayawardana

    (Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia
    Department of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Kandy 20400, Sri Lanka)

  • Malindu Sandanayake

    (Institute of Sustainable Infrastructure and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

  • Asela K. Kulatunga

    (Department of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Kandy 20400, Sri Lanka)

  • J. A. S. C. Jayasinghe

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Kandy 20400, Sri Lanka)

  • Guomin Zhang

    (Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

  • S. A. Udara Osadith

    (Department of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Kandy 20400, Sri Lanka)

Abstract

Circular economy (CE) is an emergent concept that promotes resource circularity in multiple product systems. Modular construction (MC), an evolving construction technique, which includes an off-site manufacturing environment, increasingly supports CE strategies such as reuse due to the elevated potential for design for disassembly (DfD). Design-stage environmental assessments are paramount in aiding the early decision making of modular construction projects to successfully plan and implement DfD strategies. Research on synergising modular construction, circular economy and environmental sustainability is rare in developing economies. Thus, the current study aims to conduct a design-stage life cycle assessment of a DfD and linear versions of a modular building unit in Sri Lanka to evaluate the potential environmental benefits. The life cycle assessment results highlight that the DfD strategy has the lowest environmental impacts in all categories, with a 63% reduction in global warming potential and an approximately 90% reduction in terms of human toxicity compared to the linear version. Further, it showed the elevated potential of reuse compared to recycling practices in improving the environmental performance. Sensitivity assessment revealed that steel was the most sensitive to the change in reuse percentage among main building materials. The analysis outcomes highlight the importance of long-term thinking, architectural design creativity and industrial and technology development to uptake the CE-driven MC in the Sri Lankan context. Finally, strategies are proposed to support the CE approach in MC in developing regions. Both quantitative and qualitative outcomes provide a basis for construction industry stakeholders, academia, and policy makers to explore further and promote modular construction practices to enhance the circularity of building materials and components in developing regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Janappriya Jayawardana & Malindu Sandanayake & Asela K. Kulatunga & J. A. S. C. Jayasinghe & Guomin Zhang & S. A. Udara Osadith, 2023. "Evaluating the Circular Economy Potential of Modular Construction in Developing Economies—A Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16336-:d:1288611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16336/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16336/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberta Melella & Giacomo Di Ruocco & Alfonso Sorvillo, 2021. "Circular Construction Process: Method for Developing a Selective, Low CO 2eq Disassembly and Demolition Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-34, August.
    2. Timothy M. O’Grady & Nicholas Brajkovich & Roberto Minunno & Heap-Yih Chong & Gregory M. Morrison, 2021. "Circular Economy and Virtual Reality in Advanced BIM-Based Prefabricated Construction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Rabia Charef & Jean-Claude Morel & Kambiz Rakhshan, 2021. "Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Garusinghe Dewa Ayesha Udari Garusinghe & Balasooriya Arachchige Kanchana Shiromi Perera & Umesha Sasanthi Weerapperuma, 2023. "Integrating Circular Economy Principles in Modular Construction to Enhance Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xianhai Meng & Simran Das & Junyu Meng, 2023. "Integration of Digital Twin and Circular Economy in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Hui Zhu & Shuenn-Ren Liou & Pi-Cheng Chen & Xia-Yun He & Meng-Lin Sui, 2024. "Carbon Emissions Reduction of a Circular Architectural Practice: A Study on a Reversible Design Pavilion Using Recycled Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Caroline Samberger & Sanaz Imen & Katerina Messologitis & Arthur Umble & Joseph G. Jacangelo, 2024. "Assessing circularity of wastewater treatment systems: A critical review of indicators," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(2), pages 262-276, April.
    4. Fahime Lotfian Delouyi & Meisam Ranjbari & Zahra Shams Esfandabadi, 2023. "A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Explore Barriers to the Circular Economy Implementation in the Food Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Fatima Afzal & Roksana Jahan Tumpa, 2024. "Exploring Leadership Styles to Foster Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-32, January.
    6. Aníbal Maury-Ramírez & Danny Illera-Perozo & Jaime A. Mesa, 2022. "Circular Economy in the Construction Sector: A Case Study of Santiago de Cali (Colombia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Cyrine Mrad & Luís Frölén Ribeiro, 2022. "A Review of Europe’s Circular Economy in the Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Chun-Chih Chen & Chi-Hui Lai & Nai-Ren Guo & Shu-Ming Wu, 2024. "Exploring the Consumer Acceptance of Circular Housing from the Perspective of SOR Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    9. Christiono Utomo & Sulfiah Dwi Astarini & Dewa Made Satriya Wibawa Mertha & Yani Rahmawati & Aqsha & Cahyono Bintang Nurcahyo & Maulita Nahdiyah, 2022. "Decision Factors of Stakeholder Integration in Connected Construction for Circular Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Jordana de Oliveira & Dusan Schreiber & Vanusca Dalosto Jahno, 2024. "Circular Economy and Buildings as Material Banks in Mitigation of Environmental Impacts from Construction and Demolition Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, June.
    11. Rabia Charef, 2024. "A Digital Framework for the Implementation of the Circular Economy in the Construction Sector: Expert Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Israt Jahan & Guomin Zhang & Muhammed Bhuiyan & Satheeskumar Navaratnam & Long Shi, 2022. "Experts’ Perceptions of the Management and Minimisation of Waste in the Australian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Ziyuan Chi & Zhen Liu & Fenghong Wang & Mohamed Osmani, 2023. "Driving Circular Economy through Digital Technologies: Current Research Status and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-28, December.
    14. Rubee Singh & Shahbaz Khan & Piera Centobelli, 2022. "Investigating the Interplay between Social Performance and Organisational Factors Supporting Circular Economy Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Fuat Emre Kaya & Antonello Monsù Scolaro, 2023. "Circularity as a Climate Change Mitigation Strategy in the Building Sector: The Stakeholder’s Involvement in the Interconnected Life Cycle Phases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Prin Boonkanit & Kridchai Suthiluck, 2023. "Developing a Decision-Making Support System for a Smart Construction and Demolition Waste Transition to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    17. Manuel Cabaleiro & Borja Conde & Cristina González-Gaya & Brais Barros, 2023. "Removable, Reconfigurable, and Sustainable Steel Structures: A State-of-the-Art Review of Clamp-Based Steel Connections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Isaac Akomea-Frimpong & Xiaohua Jin & Robert Osei-Kyei, 2022. "Mapping Studies on Sustainability in the Performance Measurement of Public-Private Partnership Projects: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Rohit Kumar & Saurav Kumar Gupta & Hwang-Cheng Wang & C. Shyamala Kumari & Sai Srinivas Vara Prasad Korlam, 2023. "From Efficiency to Sustainability: Exploring the Potential of 6G for a Greener Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-45, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16336-:d:1288611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.