IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p5022-d1413605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Circular Economy and Buildings as Material Banks in Mitigation of Environmental Impacts from Construction and Demolition Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Jordana de Oliveira

    (Department of Environmental Quality, Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo 93510-235, Brazil)

  • Dusan Schreiber

    (Department of Environmental Quality, Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo 93510-235, Brazil)

  • Vanusca Dalosto Jahno

    (Department of Environmental Quality, Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo 93510-235, Brazil)

Abstract

The circular economy is one of the main strategies for mitigating the environmental impacts of civil construction due to the generation of construction and demolition waste (CDW). In this transition, evaluating alternatives for using buildings as material banks is a way to make the process of reusing construction components more efficient. Thus, the article aimed to evaluate the state of the art of publications on the relationship between the circular economy in civil construction and the conceptual model of buildings as material banks to mitigate the environmental impacts of CDW. The authors chose the methodological design of Systematic Literature Review, using the Scopus and Web of Science databases for research, with the following search strings: (“construction” or “civil construction” or “built environment” or “construction industry”) and (“circular economy” or “circular construction”) and (“material banks” or “BAMB” or “buildings as material banks” or “building stocks” or “building materials”) and (“construction waste” or “demolition waste” or “CDW” or “construction and demolition waste” or “environmental impacts”). After a screening in which only articles published in journals were selected, from 2013 to 2023, inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, to evaluate only those that had a direct relationship with CDW management through circular economy strategies and buildings such as banks of material. As a result, 93 articles remained, which were analyzed using a quantitative and qualitative approach. The predominance of applied studies was also noted through case studies that evaluate the management of materials and waste in the urban environment. The qualitative analysis, carried out using a SWOT matrix, highlighted the strengths of the buildings, such as material banks, the potential reduction of resource extraction and urban mining, and promoting the circulation of construction products. However, the recycling of waste, such as aggregates, still stands out as the main end-of-life strategy adopted, even without occupying the top of the waste hierarchy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jordana de Oliveira & Dusan Schreiber & Vanusca Dalosto Jahno, 2024. "Circular Economy and Buildings as Material Banks in Mitigation of Environmental Impacts from Construction and Demolition Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5022-:d:1413605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5022/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5022/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberta Melella & Giacomo Di Ruocco & Alfonso Sorvillo, 2021. "Circular Construction Process: Method for Developing a Selective, Low CO 2eq Disassembly and Demolition Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-34, August.
    2. Benjamin Sanchez & Carl Haas, 2018. "Capital project planning for a circular economy," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 303-312, June.
    3. Claudio Zandonella Callegher & Gianluca Grazieschi & Eric Wilczynski & Ulrich Filippi Oberegger & Simon Pezzutto, 2023. "Assessment of Building Materials in the European Residential Building Stock: An Analysis at EU27 Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Pei-Yu Wu & Kristina Mjörnell & Mikael Mangold & Claes Sandels & Tim Johansson, 2021. "A Data-Driven Approach to Assess the Risk of Encountering Hazardous Materials in the Building Stock Based on Environmental Inventories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Stefan Schützenhofer & Iva Kovacic & Helmut Rechberger & Stephanie Mack, 2022. "Improvement of Environmental Sustainability and Circular Economy through Construction Waste Management for Material Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Zhu & Shuenn-Ren Liou & Pi-Cheng Chen & Xia-Yun He & Meng-Lin Sui, 2024. "Carbon Emissions Reduction of a Circular Architectural Practice: A Study on a Reversible Design Pavilion Using Recycled Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Mateusz Wielopolski & Willem Bulthuis, 2023. "The Better Building Initiative — a Collaborative Ecosystem Involving All Stakeholders as Catalyst to Accelerate the Adoption of Circular Economy Innovations in the Construction Sector," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 719-733, June.
    3. Mia B. Münster, 2024. "Adaptive Reuse: Atmospherics in Buildings Repurposed as Coffee Shops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-32, February.
    4. Amjad Almusaed & Ibrahim Yitmen & Asaad Almssad, 2023. "Reviewing and Integrating AEC Practices into Industry 6.0: Strategies for Smart and Sustainable Future-Built Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.
    5. Xiaohua Gu & Yanwei Zhu & Siwen Liu & Shangwen Zhu & Yan Liu, 2022. "Preparation of Mullite/PU Nanocomposites by Double Waste Co-Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Julia Köhler & Sönnich Dahl Sönnichsen & Philip Beske‐Jansen, 2022. "Towards a collaboration framework for circular economy: The role of dynamic capabilities and open innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2700-2713, September.
    7. Charef, Rabia & Ganjian, Eshmaiel & Emmitt, Stephen, 2021. "Socio-economic and environmental barriers for a holistic asset lifecycle approach to achieve circular economy: A pattern-matching method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Orlando Corigliano & Marco Iannuzzi & Crescenzo Pellegrino & Francesco D’Amico & Leonardo Pagnotta & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2023. "Enhancing Energy Processes and Facilities Redesign in an Anaerobic Digestion Plant for Biomethane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, August.
    9. Xie, Chengyuan & Huang, Lu, 2024. "How to drive sustainable economic development: The role of fintech, natural resources, and social vulnerability," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Janappriya Jayawardana & Malindu Sandanayake & Asela K. Kulatunga & J. A. S. C. Jayasinghe & Guomin Zhang & S. A. Udara Osadith, 2023. "Evaluating the Circular Economy Potential of Modular Construction in Developing Economies—A Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-25, November.
    11. Magdalena Gyurkovich & Joanna Kołata & Marta Pieczara & Piotr Zierke, 2024. "Assessment of the Greenery Content in Suburban Multi-Family Housing Models in Poland: A Case Study of the Poznań Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-31, April.
    12. Sondre Litleskare & Wendy Wuyts, 2023. "Planning Reclamation, Diagnosis and Reuse in Norwegian Timber Construction with Circular Economy Investment and Operating Costs for Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    13. Rabia Charef & Jean-Claude Morel & Kambiz Rakhshan, 2021. "Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Arghavan Akbarieh & Laddu Bhagya Jayasinghe & Danièle Waldmann & Felix Norman Teferle, 2020. "BIM-Based End-of-Lifecycle Decision Making and Digital Deconstruction: Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-29, March.
    15. Shankar Sankaran & Mattias Jacobsson & Tomas Blomquist, 2021. "The history and future of projects as a transition innovation: Towards a sustainable project management framework," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 696-714, October.
    16. Zhe Wang & Shupeng Li & Zijian Lin & Jiancong Ye & Yi Yang & Qiang Yue, 2024. "Modeling Aluminum Stocks and Flows in China until 2050 Using a Bottom-Up Approach: Business-As-Usual Scenario Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Genovese, P.V. & Zoure, A.N., 2023. "Architecture trends and challenges in sub-Saharan Africa's construction industry: A theoretical guideline of a bioclimatic architecture evolution based on the multi-scale approach and circular economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. Hossain, Md. Uzzal & Ng, S. Thomas & Antwi-Afari, Prince & Amor, Ben, 2020. "Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    19. Leonora Charlotte Malabi Eberhardt & Anne van Stijn & Liv Kristensen Stranddorf & Morten Birkved & Harpa Birgisdottir, 2021. "Environmental Design Guidelines for Circular Building Components: The Case of the Circular Building Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5022-:d:1413605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.