IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i5p1285-d1606318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decarbonizing the Construction Sector: Strategies and Pathways for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Charikleia Karakosta

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, Energy Policy Unit (EPU-NTUA), School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Ir. Politechniou 9, Zografou, 15780 Athens, Greece
    Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, 156 Egnatia Street, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Jason Papathanasiou

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, 156 Egnatia Street, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

The construction sector is a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, necessitating urgent decarbonization efforts to align with international climate goals such as the Paris Agreement and the European Green Deal. This study explores a comprehensive framework for construction companies to map and reduce their GHG emissions through a structured four-step approach: defining emission scopes, conducting GHG inventories, setting reduction targets, and planning actionable reductions. Four key pathways are proposed: electricity decarbonization through renewable energy adoption and energy efficiency measures; direct emissions reduction via fleet electrification and infrastructure optimization; recycling and resource efficiency improvements through waste diversion and material reuse; and supply chain emissions reduction by enforcing sustainability standards and responsible sourcing practices. The analysis highlights the importance of integrating technological, organizational, and policy-driven solutions, such as rooftop photovoltaic systems, virtual power purchase agreements, waste management strategies, and supplier codes of conduct aligned with global sustainability benchmarks. The study concludes that construction companies can achieve significant emission reductions by adopting a structured, multi-pathway approach; emphasizing progress over perfection; and aligning their strategies with national and international climate targets. This research provides actionable insights for the construction sector to transition toward a net-zero future by 2050.

Suggested Citation

  • Charikleia Karakosta & Jason Papathanasiou, 2025. "Decarbonizing the Construction Sector: Strategies and Pathways for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1285-:d:1606318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1285/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1285/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vennapusa Jagadeeswara Reddy & N. P. Hariram & Mohd Fairusham Ghazali & Sudhakar Kumarasamy, 2024. "Pathway to Sustainability: An Overview of Renewable Energy Integration in Building Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-36, January.
    2. Trang Tran & Hiromasa Goto & Takuma Matsuda, 2021. "The Impact of China’s Tightening Environmental Regulations on International Waste Trade and Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Sime Curkovic & Robert Sroufe, 2011. "Using ISO 14001 to promote a sustainable supply chain strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 71-93, February.
    4. Rabia Charef & Jean-Claude Morel & Kambiz Rakhshan, 2021. "Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Didem Gunes Yilmaz & Fatma Cesur, 2023. "A Study for the Improvement of the Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) System in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Junling Jiang & Zhaoxin He & Changren Ke, 2023. "Construction Contractors’ Carbon Emissions Reduction Intention: A Study Based on Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano & Lucia Rocchi & Lorenzo Negri & Lea Piscitelli, 2025. "Evaluating the Progress of the EU Countries Towards Implementation of the European Green Deal: A Multiple Criteria Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Charikleia Karakosta & Jason Papathanasiou, 2024. "Climate-Driven Sustainable Energy Investments: Key Decision Factors for a Low-Carbon Transition Using a Multi-Criteria Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, November.
    9. Israa Al Khaffaf & Adil Tamimi & Vian Ahmed, 2024. "Pathways to Carbon Neutrality: A Review of Strategies and Technologies Across Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-38, December.
    10. Shadeedha Mohamed Saradara & Malik Mansoor Ali Khalfan & Abdul Rauf & Rubina Qureshi, 2023. "On The Path towards Sustainable Construction—The Case of the United Arab Emirates: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, October.
    11. Klaudia Nowak-Marchewka & Emilia Osmólska & Monika Stoma, 2025. "Progress and Challenges of Circular Economy in Selected EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-35, January.
    12. Clora, Francesco & Yu, Wusheng & Corong, Erwin, 2023. "Alternative carbon border adjustment mechanisms in the European Union and international responses: Aggregate and within-coalition results," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Huanyu Wu & Wenwen Zhou & Kunyang Chen & Lianxiang Zhang & Zicheng Zhang & Yanqiu Li & Zhijun Hu, 2023. "Carbon Emissions Assessment for Building Decoration Based on Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study of Office Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Lela Tijanić & Ines Kersan-Škabić, 2025. "Tracking the Green Transition in the European Union Within the Framework of EU Cohesion Policy: Current Results and Future Paths," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Kateřina Nováková & Anna Pražanová & Daniel-Ioan Stroe & Vaclav Knap, 2023. "Second-Life of Lithium-Ion Batteries from Electric Vehicles: Concept, Aging, Testing, and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Lars J. Nilsson & Fredric Bauer & Max Åhman & Fredrik N. G. Andersson & Chris Bataille & Stephane de la Rue du Can & Karin Ericsson & Teis Hansen & Bengt Johansson & Stefan Lechtenböhmer & Mariësse va, 2021. "An industrial policy framework for transforming energy and emissions intensive industries towards zero emissions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 1053-1065, September.
    17. Ningshuang Zeng & Yan Liu & Chao Mao & Markus König, 2018. "Investigating the Relationship between Construction Supply Chain Integration and Sustainable Use of Material: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lopez, Gabriel & Galimova, Tansu & Fasihi, Mahdi & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2023. "Towards defossilised steel: Supply chain options for a green European steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    2. Timothé Beaufils & Joschka Wanner & Leonie Wenz, 2024. "The Potential of Carbon Border Adjustments to Foster Climate Cooperation," CESifo Working Paper Series 11429, CESifo.
    3. Hung M. Nguyen & George Onofrei & Dothang Truong & Simon Lockrey, 2020. "Customer green orientation and process innovation alignment: A configuration approach in the global manufacturing industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2498-2513, September.
    4. Hammad Riaz & Abubakr Saeed, 2020. "Impact of environmental policy on firm's market performance: The case of ISO 14001," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 681-693, March.
    5. Hammad Riaz & Abubakr Saeed & Muhammad Saad Baloch & Nasrullah & Zeeshan Ahmad Khan, 2019. "Valuation of Environmental Management Standard ISO 14001: Evidence from an Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Stanley Kam Sing Wong, 2013. "Environmental Requirements, Knowledge Sharing and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from the Electronics Industry in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 321-338, July.
    7. Rebecca Edwards & Graham Smith & Milena Büchs, 2013. "Environmental Management Systems and the Third Sector: Exploring Weak Adoption in the UK," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(1), pages 119-133, February.
    8. Jonas Gamso, 2018. "Trade-based adoption of voluntary environmental programs in the developing world: Racing to the top or stuck in the mud?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 515-543, December.
    9. Yusuf Berkay Metinal & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp, 2025. "Uncovering Barriers to Circular Construction: A Global Scientometric Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-50, February.
    10. Surender Kumar & Pritika Dua, 2022. "Environmental management practices and financial performance: evidence from large listed Indian enterprises," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(1), pages 37-61, January.
    11. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2022. "The rationale for ISO 14001 certification: A systematic review and a cost–benefit analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 1067-1083, July.
    12. Nhat Quang Doan & Syed Maaz Shahid & Tho Minh Duong & Sung-Jin Choi & Sungoh Kwon, 2024. "Extending the BESS Lifetime: A Cooperative Multi-Agent Deep Q Network Framework for a Parallel-Series Connected Battery Pack," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Honma, Satoshi & Ushifusa, Yoshiaki & Okamura, Soyoka & Vandercamme, Lilu, 2023. "Measuring carbon emissions performance of Japan's metal industry: Energy inputs, agglomeration, and the potential for green recovery reduction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Muhammad Ikram & Qingyu Zhang & Robert Sroufe, 2020. "Developing integrated management systems using an AHP‐Fuzzy VIKOR approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2265-2283, September.
    15. Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Eugenio Oropallo & Wael Hassan El‐Garaihy & Tamer Farag & Khalid Hassan Al Shehri, 2022. "Towards a sustainable development assessment framework to bridge supply chain practices and technologies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 647-663, August.
    16. Marco Pesce & Chenyi Shi & Andrea Critto & Xiaohui Wang & Antonio Marcomini, 2018. "SWOT Analysis of the Application of International Standard ISO 14001 in the Chinese Context. A Case Study of Guangdong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Ikram, M. & Sroufe, Robert & Rehman, E. & Shah, S.Z.A. & Mahmoudi, A., 2020. "Do Quality, Environmental, and Social (QES) Certifications Improve International Trade? A Comparative Grey Relation Analysis of Developing vs. Developed Countries," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    18. Vu Minh Ngo & Huy Truong Quang & Thinh Gia Hoang & An Duong Thi Binh, 2024. "Sustainability‐related supply chain risks and supply chain performances: The moderating effects of dynamic supply chain management practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 839-857, February.
    19. Aníbal Maury-Ramírez & Danny Illera-Perozo & Jaime A. Mesa, 2022. "Circular Economy in the Construction Sector: A Case Study of Santiago de Cali (Colombia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Cyrine Mrad & Luís Frölén Ribeiro, 2022. "A Review of Europe’s Circular Economy in the Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1285-:d:1606318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.