IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16200-d993571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Factors of Stakeholder Integration in Connected Construction for Circular Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Christiono Utomo

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)

  • Sulfiah Dwi Astarini

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)

  • Dewa Made Satriya Wibawa Mertha

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)

  • Yani Rahmawati

    (Department of Architecture and Planning, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Aqsha

    (Department of Bioenergy Engineering and Chemurgy, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Cahyono Bintang Nurcahyo

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)

  • Maulita Nahdiyah

    (Department of Management Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)

Abstract

The implementation of construction circular economics (CCE) will encourage higher green economic growth. The circular approach will be part of connected construction and is an approach that integrates processes and products from design to construction execution and then to the management of buildings, properties, and assets. Decision making for CCE involves many stakeholders who are involved in the entire connection process. In such situations, integration and negotiating support are needed. The aim of this study is to find the theoretical basis of decisions that allow stakeholders to share different preferences when selecting CCE options for the circular economic prototype of building systems. As a result, five dominant factors are obtained: the sustainability of the building system, energy efficiency, capture value creation, a high-level three-party consortia, risk allocation, and transfer. Each stakeholder has their own preferences, and these will determine the different priority of the alternatives to be selected. Finally, the priority of alternative choices is determined based on the connected construction process. A comparison of what is desirable for all stakeholders is the basis of choice before negotiations are carried out. Furthermore, negotiation automation can be achieved because in this paper, the satisficing algorithm is applied to the decision model and stakeholder integration. Optimal payoff and the best-fitting option based on coalition are important and interesting avenues for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Christiono Utomo & Sulfiah Dwi Astarini & Dewa Made Satriya Wibawa Mertha & Yani Rahmawati & Aqsha & Cahyono Bintang Nurcahyo & Maulita Nahdiyah, 2022. "Decision Factors of Stakeholder Integration in Connected Construction for Circular Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16200-:d:993571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Ming-Jia & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2017. "Review of methodologies and polices for evaluation of energy efficiency in high energy-consuming industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 203-215.
    2. Asheem Shrestha & Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Igor Martek & M Reza Hosseini & David J Edwards, 2019. "A Principal-Agent Theory Perspective on PPP Risk Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Pablo Ponce & Muhammad Tanveer & Nathalie Aguirre-Padilla & Haider Mahmood & Syed Adeel Ali Shah, 2021. "Technological Innovation and Circular Economy Practices: Business Strategies to Mitigate the Effects of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Liao, Li-Kai & Lin, Yi-Mien & Lin, Tsung-Wen, 2016. "Non-financial performance in product market and capital expenditure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2151-2159.
    5. Marina Bos-de Vos & J.W.F. Hans Wamelink & Leentje Volker, 2016. "Trade-offs in the value capture of architectural firms: the significance of professional value," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 21-34, January.
    6. Rabia Charef & Jean-Claude Morel & Kambiz Rakhshan, 2021. "Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Najjar, Mohammad & Figueiredo, Karoline & Hammad, Ahmed W.A. & Haddad, Assed, 2019. "Integrated optimization with building information modeling and life cycle assessment for generating energy efficient buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1366-1382.
    8. Love, Peter E.D. & Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic & Welde, Morten & Odeck, James, 2017. "Light rail transit cost performance: Opportunities for future-proofing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 27-39.
    9. Byson Beracah Majanga, 2018. "Corporate CAPEX and market capitalization of firms on Malawi stock exchange: an empirical study," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(1), pages 108-119, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oleksii Lyulyov & Olena Chygryn & Tetyana Pimonenko & Aleksy Kwilinski, 2023. "Stakeholders’ Engagement in the Company’s Management as a Driver of Green Competitiveness within Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benedek Kiss & Jose Dinis Silvestre & Rita Andrade Santos & Zsuzsa Szalay, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Optimisation of Buildings in Portugal and Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Linlin Zheng & Yashi Dong & Jineng Chen & Yuyi Li & Wenzhuo Li & Miaolian Su, 2022. "Impact of Crisis on Sustainable Business Model Innovation—The Role of Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Mohamed Elhefnawy & Ahmed Ragab & Mohamed-Salah Ouali, 2023. "Polygon generation and video-to-video translation for time-series prediction," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 261-279, January.
    4. Xu, Yang & Li, Ming-Jia & Zheng, Zhang-Jing & Xue, Xiao-Dai, 2018. "Melting performance enhancement of phase change material by a limited amount of metal foam: Configurational optimization and economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 868-880.
    5. Jin Zhu & Dequn Zhou & Zhengning Pu & Huaping Sun, 2019. "A Study of Regional Power Generation Efficiency in China: Based on a Non-Radial Directional Distance Function Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Yan Bai & Xingyi Ma & Jing Zhang & Lei Zhang & Jing Bai, 2024. "Energy Efficiency Assessment and Prediction Based on Indicator System, PSO + AHP − FCE Model and Regression Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Muhammad Suleman Malik & Naveed Iftikhar & Abdul Wadood & Muhammad Omer Khan & Muhammad Usman Asghar & Shahbaz Khan & Tahir Khurshaid & Ki-Chai Kim & Zabdur Rehman & S. Tauqeer ul Islam Rizvi, 2020. "Design and Fabrication of Solar Thermal Energy Storage System Using Potash Alum as a PCM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Muhammad Tanveer & Harsandaldeep Kaur & George Thomas & Haider Mahmood & Mandakini Paruthi & Zhang Yu, 2021. "Mobile Phone Buying Decisions among Young Adults: An Empirical Study of Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Zeng, Zhichen & Ni, Dong & Xiao, Gang, 2022. "Real-time heliostat field aiming strategy optimization based on reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    10. Si, Tong & Wang, Chunbo & Liu, Ruiqi & Guo, Yusheng & Yue, Shuang & Ren, Yujie, 2020. "Multi-criteria comprehensive energy efficiency assessment based on fuzzy-AHP method: A case study of post-treatment technologies for coal-fired units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    11. Tanveer, Muhammad & Mahmood, Haider & Haq, Ikram Ul & Rather, Raouf Ahmad & Ali, Haider, 2021. "Higher Education Quality Assurance Framework Pathway for Transformation in Pakistan: Managerial and Economic Perspectives," MPRA Paper 109253, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Lawrence, Akvile & Karlsson, Magnus & Nehler, Therese & Thollander, Patrik, 2019. "Effects of monetary investment, payback time and firm characteristics on electricity saving in energy-intensive industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 499-512.
    13. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Yan, Jun-Jie & Wang, Kun, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance analysis of different supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures in the molten salt solar power tower systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 785-798.
    14. Caroline Samberger & Sanaz Imen & Katerina Messologitis & Arthur Umble & Joseph G. Jacangelo, 2024. "Assessing circularity of wastewater treatment systems: A critical review of indicators," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(2), pages 262-276, April.
    15. Ye, Zhongnan & Cheng, Kuangly & Hsu, Shu-Chien & Wei, Hsi-Hsien & Cheung, Clara Man, 2021. "Identifying critical building-oriented features in city-block-level building energy consumption: A data-driven machine learning approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    16. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Pablo Ponce & George Thomas & Zhang Yu & Mohammad Saad Al-Ahmadi & Muhammad Tanveer, 2021. "Digital Technologies, Circular Economy Practices and Environmental Policies in the Era of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Ahmad Jrade & Farnaz Jalaei & Jieying Jane Zhang & Saeed Jalilzadeh Eirdmousa & Farzad Jalaei, 2023. "Potential Integration of Bridge Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment/Life Cycle Costing Tools for Infrastructure Projects within Construction 4.0: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    19. Hermundsdottir, Fanny & Haneberg, Dag Håkon & Aspelund, Arild, 2022. "Analyzing the impact of COVID-19 on environmental innovations in manufacturing firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    20. Alessandro Franco & Lorenzo Miserocchi & Daniele Testi, 2023. "Energy Indicators for Enabling Energy Transition in Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16200-:d:993571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.