IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p15156-d1265251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Digitalization on Process Optimization and Decision-Making towards Sustainability: The Moderating Role of Environmental Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Yixuan Peng

    (School of Law, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Sayed Fayaz Ahmad

    (Department of Engineering Management, Institute of Business Management, Karachi 74000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Irshad

    (Department of Management Sciences, University of Gwadar, Gwadar 91200, Pakistan)

  • Muna Al-Razgan

    (Department of Software Engineering, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Yasser A. Ali

    (Department of Information System, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Emad Marous Awwad

    (Electrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Digitalization has brought a significant improvement in process optimization and decision-making processes, in particular in pursuing the goal of sustainability. This study examines how digitalization has affected process optimization and decision-making towards sustainability, focusing on Pakistan’s manufacturing sector. This study also examines the moderating role of environmental regulations between digitalization and sustainable practices. This study is based on quantitative methodology. Purposive sampling was used to gather primary data from 554 managers and engineers working in manufacturing industries in Pakistan through a closed-ended questionnaire. Smart PLS was used for data analysis. The findings show digitalization’s positive and significant influence on process optimization and decision-making. The results also show that environmental regulations have a significant moderating effect on the digitalization of processes and decision-making towards sustainability practices. The findings provide a guideline for industries, decision-makers, and researchers for developing strategies that effectively use digitalization for sustainability and assist in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SGD-9, SGD-11, SGD-12, and SGD-13).

Suggested Citation

  • Yixuan Peng & Sayed Fayaz Ahmad & Muhammad Irshad & Muna Al-Razgan & Yasser A. Ali & Emad Marous Awwad, 2023. "Impact of Digitalization on Process Optimization and Decision-Making towards Sustainability: The Moderating Role of Environmental Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15156-:d:1265251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15156/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15156/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moritz, Jana & McPartlin, Maria & Tuomisto, Hanna L. & Ryynänen, Toni, 2023. "A multi-level perspective of potential transition pathways towards cultured meat: Finnish and German political stakeholder perceptions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
    2. Sascha Fuerst & Odille Sanchez-Dominguez & Miguel Angel Rodriguez-Montes, 2023. "The Role of Digital Technology within the Business Model of Sustainable Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Günter K Stahl & Martha L Maznevski, 2021. "Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A retrospective of research on multicultural work groups and an agenda for future research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(1), pages 4-22, February.
    4. Nicole Darnall & Irene Henriques & Perry Sadorsky, 2010. "Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1072-1094, September.
    5. Aditi Nag, 2022. "Industrial infrastructure development of cottage industries for inclusive economic growth in a sustainable manner: case study of the urban growth centre in Bishnupur, West Bengal, India," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(2), pages 204-233.
    6. Congbin Cheng & Sayed Fayaz Ahmad & Muhammad Irshad & Ghadeer Alsanie & Yasser Khan & Ahmad Y. A. Bani Ahmad (Ayassrah) & Abdu Rahman Aleemi, 2023. "Impact of Green Process Innovation and Productivity on Sustainability: The Moderating Role of Environmental Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Danny Miller, 1987. "The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 55-76, January.
    8. Antonio Miceli & Birgit Hagen & Maria Pia Riccardi & Francesco Sotti & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "Thriving, Not Just Surviving in Changing Times: How Sustainability, Agility and Digitalization Intertwine with Organizational Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Yu-Shan Chen & Shyh-Bao Lai & Chao-Tung Wen, 2006. "The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 331-339, September.
    10. Shankar, Anita V. & Quinn, Ashlinn K. & Dickinson, Katherine L. & Williams, Kendra N. & Masera, Omar & Charron, Dana & Jack, Darby & Hyman, Jasmine & Pillarisetti, Ajay & Bailis, Rob & Kumar, Praveen , 2020. "Everybody stacks: Lessons from household energy case studies to inform design principles for clean energy transitions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    11. Latifi, Mohammad-Ali & Nikou, Shahrokh & Bouwman, Harry, 2021. "Business model innovation and firm performance: Exploring causal mechanisms in SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. Blandine Ageron & Omar Bentahar & Angappa Gunasekaran, 2020. "Digital Supply chain: challenges and future directions," Post-Print hal-03021364, HAL.
    13. Violeta Sima & Ileana Georgiana Gheorghe & Jonel Subić & Dumitru Nancu, 2020. "Influences of the Industry 4.0 Revolution on the Human Capital Development and Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-28, May.
    14. Clay M. Voorhees & Michael K. Brady & Roger Calantone & Edward Ramirez, 2016. "Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 119-134, January.
    15. Li, Zhenghui & Huang, Zimei & Su, Yaya, 2023. "New media environment, environmental regulation and corporate green technology innovation:Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    16. Gholamreza Askari & Madjid Eshaghi Gordji & Choonkil Park, 2019. "The behavioral model and game theory," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, December.
    17. Bruce R Lewis & Gary F Templeton & Terry Anthony Byrd, 2005. "A methodology for construct development in MIS research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 388-400, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali Nawaz Khan & Khalid Mehmood & Ahsan Ali, 2024. "Maximizing CSR impact: Leveraging artificial intelligence and process optimization for sustainability performance management," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4849-4861, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kent Walker & Na Ni & Bruno Dyck, 2015. "Recipes for Successful Sustainability: Empirical Organizational Configurations for Strong Corporate Environmental Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 40-57, January.
    2. Arnaud Le Van, 2020. "Les barrières pour le développement de produits verts et la rentabilité des PME vietnamiennes," Working Papers hal-02482057, HAL.
    3. Lu Zhang & Shuang Zhao & Li Cui & Lin Wu, 2020. "Exploring Green Innovation Practices: Content Analysis of the Fortune Global 500 Companies," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, March.
    4. Leal-Rodríguez, Antonio L. & Ariza-Montes, Antonio J. & Morales-Fernández, Emilio & Albort-Morant, Gema, 2018. "Green innovation, indeed a cornerstone in linking market requests and business performance. Evidence from the Spanish automotive components industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 185-193.
    5. Zhen Zhang, 2024. "Exploring the green edge: the role of market orientation and knowledge management in achieving competitive advantage through creativity," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Carmen Elena Stoenoiu & Lorentz Jäntschi, 2024. "Sustainable Development of the Economy—A Case Study of the Impacts of the Size of Enterprises and Factors Affecting Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-38, June.
    7. Taewoo Roh & Shufeng Simon Xiao & Byung Il Park, 2023. "Effects of open innovation on eco-innovation in meta-organizations: evidence from Korean SMEs," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 2004-2028, November.
    8. Xue Yang & Yuandi Wang & Die Hu & Yongqiang Gao, 2018. "How industry peers improve your sustainable development? The role of listed firms in environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1313-1333, December.
    9. Chao Hung Wang, 2020. "An environmental perspective extends market orientation: Green innovation sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3123-3134, December.
    10. Baoshan Ge & Yibing Yang & Dake Jiang & Yang Gao & Xiaomin Du & Tingting Zhou, 2018. "An Empirical Study on Green Innovation Strategy and Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Path and Boundary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Pinget, Amandine, 2016. "Spécificités des déterminants des innovations environnementales : une approche appliquée aux PME [Specificities of determinants for environmental innovation : an approach applied to SMEs]," MPRA Paper 80108, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. De Xia & Wenhua Chen & Qinglu Gao & Rui Zhang & Yundong Zhang, 2021. "Research on Enterprises’ Intention to Adopt Green Technology Imposed by Environmental Regulations with Perspective of State Ownership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Kawai, Norifumi & Strange, Roger & Zucchella, Antonella, 2018. "Stakeholder pressures, EMS implementation, and green innovation in MNC overseas subsidiaries," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 933-946.
    14. Norifumi Kawai & Roger Strange & Antonella Zucchella, 2016. "Stakeholder Pressures, EMS Implementation, and Green Innovation in MNC Overseas Subsidiaries," DEM Working Papers Series 121, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    15. Manjot Singh Bhatia & Saurabh Kumar, 2022. "Linking stakeholder and competitive pressure to Industry 4.0 and performance: Mediating effect of environmental commitment and green process innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1905-1918, July.
    16. Tielong Wu, 2024. "Green finance reform policy increases corporate hypocritical business strategies: Evidence from the greenwashing behavior," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1-28, October.
    17. Mei Han & Bilin Xu, 2021. "Distance with Customers Effects on Green Product Innovation in SMEs: A Way Through Green Value Co-creation," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    18. Yali Zhang & Jun Sun & Zhaojun Yang & Shurong Li, 2018. "Organizational Learning and Green Innovation: Does Environmental Proactivity Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Derya Ozilhan Ozbey & Gul Coskun Degirmen & Osman Nurullah Berk & Emine Sardagi & Emel Celep & Durmus Koc & Ebru Gozen, 2024. "Green Core Competencies, Green Process Innovation, and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Sustainability Consciousness, a Mixed Method Study on Golf Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, May.
    20. Tai-Wei Chang & Yen-Li Yeh & Hung-Xin Li, 2020. "How to Shape an Organization’s Sustainable Green Management Performance: The Mediation Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15156-:d:1265251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.