IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p15045-d1262955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Implementation of Robotic Process Automation Based on a Multi-Objective Mathematical Model

Author

Listed:
  • Leonel Patrício

    (Department of Production and Systems, and Algoritmi/LASI, University of Minho, 4804-533 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Lino Costa

    (Department of Production and Systems, and Algoritmi/LASI, University of Minho, 4804-533 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Leonilde Varela

    (Department of Production and Systems, and Algoritmi/LASI, University of Minho, 4804-533 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Paulo Ávila

    (INESC TEC—INESC Technology and Science and ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

(1) Background: In this study on Robotic Process Automation (RPA), the feasibility of sustainable RPA implementation was investigated, considering user requirements in the context of this technology’s stakeholders, with a strong emphasis on sustainability. (2) Methods: A multi-objective mathematical model was developed and the Weighted Sum and Tchebycheff methods were used to evaluate the efficiency of the implementation. An enterprise case study was utilized for data collection, employing investigation hypotheses, questionnaires, and brainstorming sessions with company stakeholders. (3) Results: The results underscore the significance of user requirements within the RPA landscape and demonstrate that integrating these requirements into the multi-objective model enhances the implementation assessment. Practical guidelines for RPA planning and management with a sustainability focus are provided. The analysis reveals a solution that reduces initial costs by 21.10% and allows for an efficient and equitable allocation of available resources. (4) Conclusion: This study advances our understanding of the interplay between user requirements and RPA feasibility, offering viable guidelines for the sustainable implementation of this technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonel Patrício & Lino Costa & Leonilde Varela & Paulo Ávila, 2023. "Sustainable Implementation of Robotic Process Automation Based on a Multi-Objective Mathematical Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-29, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15045-:d:1262955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15045/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15045/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. N. Hooker, 2007. "Planning and Scheduling by Logic-Based Benders Decomposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 588-602, June.
    2. Deborah de Lange & Timo Busch & Javier Delgado-Ceballos, 2012. "Sustaining Sustainability in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 151-156, October.
    3. Zineb Ibn Majdoub Hassani & Abdellah El Barkany & Abdel Moumen Darcherif & Abdelouahhab Jabri & Ikram El Abbassi, 2019. "Planning and scheduling problems of production systems: review, classification and opportunities," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(3), pages 372-402.
    4. Khushboo E-Fatima & Rasoul Khandan & Amin Hosseinian-Far & Dilshad Sarwar, 2023. "The Adoption of Robotic Process Automation Considering Financial Aspects in Beef Supply Chains: An Approach towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.
    5. Asatiani, Aleksandre & Copeland, Olli & Penttinen, Esko, 2023. "Deciding on the robotic process automation operating model: A checklist for RPA managers," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 109-121.
    6. Pratima Bansal, 2005. "Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 197-218, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sayantan Khanra & Puneet Kaur & Rojers P Joseph & Ashish Malik & Amandeep Dhir, 2022. "A resource‐based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1395-1413, May.
    2. Clay Dibrell & Justin Craig & Jaemin Kim & Aaron Johnson, 2015. "Establishing How Natural Environmental Competency, Organizational Social Consciousness, and Innovativeness Relate," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 591-605, March.
    3. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    4. Bárbara Galleli & Elder Semprebon & Joyce Aparecida Ramos dos Santos & Noah Emanuel Brito Teles & Mateus Santos de Freitas-Martins & Raquel Teodoro da Silva Onevetch, 2021. "Institutional Pressures, Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: How Are Organisations Engaging?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    6. Mario Vaupel & David Bendig & Denise Fischer-Kreer & Malte Brettel, 2023. "The Role of Share Repurchases for Firms’ Social and Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 401-428, March.
    7. Francesco Gangi & Antonio Meles & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 529-547, May.
    8. Ali Saleh Alshebami, 2021. "Evaluating the relevance of green banking practices on Saudi Banks’ green image: The mediating effect of employees’ green behaviour," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 275-286, December.
    9. Özgün Elçi & John Hooker, 2022. "Stochastic Planning and Scheduling with Logic-Based Benders Decomposition," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2428-2442, September.
    10. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    11. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    12. Fabien Martinez, 2014. "Corporate strategy and the environment: towards a four-dimensional compatibility model for fostering green management decisions," Post-Print hal-02887618, HAL.
    13. Maël Sommer & Karine Gauche, 2021. "Certification de groupe ISO 14001 et gestion des problèmes de durabilité en petite entreprise : une analyse lexicale du discours des agriculteurs," Post-Print hal-03791169, HAL.
    14. Kwon, He-Boong & Lee, Jooh, 2019. "Exploring the differential impact of environmental sustainability, operational efficiency, and corporate reputation on market valuation in high-tech-oriented firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1-14.
    15. Andrea Lučić, 2020. "Measuring Sustainable Marketing Orientation—Scale Development Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Zhiqiang Liu & Ji Li & Hong Zhu & Zhenyao Cai & Luning Wang, 2014. "Chinese firms’ sustainable development—The role of future orientation, environmental commitment, and employee training," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 195-213, March.
    17. Krishnadas Nanath & R Radhakrishna Pillai, 2021. "Towards a framework for sustaining Green IT initiatives: an empirical investigation," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 193-206, September.
    18. Rajan Varadarajan, 2017. "Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 14-36, January.
    19. Nurisyal Muhamad & Sofiah Md Auzair & Amizawati Mohd Amir & Md Daud Ismail, 2016. "Measuring Sustainability Performance Measurement System," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 3(12), pages 182-199, JUNE.
    20. Nascimento, Paulo Jorge & Silva, Cristóvão & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Moniz, Samuel, 2024. "Optimal decomposition approach for solving large nesting and scheduling problems of additive manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 92-110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15045-:d:1262955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.