IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v66y2023i1p109-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deciding on the robotic process automation operating model: A checklist for RPA managers

Author

Listed:
  • Asatiani, Aleksandre
  • Copeland, Olli
  • Penttinen, Esko

Abstract

Robotic process automation (RPA) has emerged as a technology promising various quick wins: fast deployment, immediate efficiency gains, and low investment requirements. While these promises have resulted in large-scale deployment of RPA in diverse industries, the choice of operating model remains tricky. This article identifies three key decisions for RPA managers: (1) the who decision, pertaining to selection of internal versus external resources for RPA development; (2) the how decision, on whether the organization will pursue RPA deployment on-premises or through the cloud; and (3) the what decision, on whether to employ proprietary RPA tools or an open-source solution. To shed light on how these decisions are made and to pinpoint their interdependencies, seven organizations’ choices connected with these three decisions are presented. The study’s main contribution is a decision checklist that can facilitate RPA managers’ navigation of the decision-making process, their gathering of relevant information, and their choice of the model best matching the organization’s needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Asatiani, Aleksandre & Copeland, Olli & Penttinen, Esko, 2023. "Deciding on the robotic process automation operating model: A checklist for RPA managers," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 109-121.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:66:y:2023:i:1:p:109-121
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2022.03.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681322000246
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.03.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hartley, Janet L. & Sawaya, William J., 2019. "Tortoise, not the hare: Digital transformation of supply chain business processes," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 707-715.
    2. Hicks, Christian & Pachamanova, Dessislava, 2007. "Back-propagation of user innovations: The open source compatibility edge," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 315-324.
    3. Allen, Sandy & Chandrashekar, Ashok, 2000. "Outsourcing services: The contract is just the beginning," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 25-34.
    4. Canhoto, Ana Isabel & Clear, Fintan, 2020. "Artificial intelligence and machine learning as business tools: A framework for diagnosing value destruction potential," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 183-193.
    5. Cusack, Brian & Ghazizadeh, Eghbal, 2016. "Evaluating single sign-on security failure in cloud services," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 605-614.
    6. Krishnamurthy, Sandeep, 2003. "A managerial overview of open source software," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 47-56.
    7. Raiborn, Cecily A. & Butler, Janet B. & Massoud, Marc F., 2009. "Outsourcing support functions: Identifying and managing the good, the bad, and the ugly," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 347-356, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rosa Virginia Encinas Quille & Felipe Valencia de Almeida & Joshua Borycz & Pedro Luiz Pizzigatti Corrêa & Lucia Vilela Leite Filgueiras & Jeaneth Machicao & Gustavo Matheus de Almeida & Edson Toshimi, 2023. "Performance Analysis Method for Robotic Process Automation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Leonel Patrício & Lino Costa & Leonilde Varela & Paulo Ávila, 2023. "Sustainable Implementation of Robotic Process Automation Based on a Multi-Objective Mathematical Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-29, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Irani, Zahir & Choy, King-Lun & Filippi, Lionel & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2015. "Performance measures and metrics in outsourcing decisions: A review for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 153-166.
    2. Mario Silic & Andrea Back, 2016. "The Influence of Risk Factors in Decision-Making Process for Open Source Software Adoption," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 151-185, January.
    3. Bavaresco, Rodrigo Simon & Nesi, Luan Carlos & Victória Barbosa, Jorge Luis & Antunes, Rodolfo Stoffel & da Rosa Righi, Rodrigo & da Costa, Cristiano André & Vanzin, Mariangela & Dornelles, Daniel & J, 2023. "Machine learning-based automation of accounting services: An exploratory case study," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    4. Fernandez Martinez, Roberto & Lostado Lorza, Ruben & Santos Delgado, Ana Alexandra & Piedra, Nelson, 2021. "Use of classification trees and rule-based models to optimize the funding assignment to research projects: A case study of UTPL," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    5. Ayat Sami ODEIBAT, 2021. "The Effect Of Technology Evolution On The Future Of Jobs," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 57-67, June.
    6. Neubert, Mitchell J. & Montañez, George D., 2020. "Virtue as a framework for the design and use of artificial intelligence," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 195-204.
    7. Williams, Christopher & Durst, Susanne, 2019. "Exploring the transition phase in offshore outsourcing: Decision making amidst knowledge at risk," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 460-471.
    8. Yongrok Choi & Xiaoxia Ye & Lu Zhao & Amanda Luo, 2016. "Optimizing enterprise risk management: a literature review and critical analysis of the work of Wu and Olson," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 281-300, February.
    9. Li, Chia-Ying & Zhang, Jin-Ting, 2023. "Chatbots or me? Consumers’ switching between human agents and conversational agents," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    11. Kamoonpuri, Sana Zehra & Sengar, Anita, 2023. "Hi, May AI help you? An analysis of the barriers impeding the implementation and use of artificial intelligence-enabled virtual assistants in retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Krishnamurthy, Sandeep & Tripathi, Arvind K., 2009. "Monetary donations to an open source software platform," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 404-414, March.
    13. Giovanni Pegoretti & Francesco Rentocchini & Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti, 2012. "An agent-based model of innovation diffusion: network structure and coexistence under different information regimes," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 7(2), pages 145-165, October.
    14. Shuhao Liang & Tingting Li, 2022. "Can Digital Transformation Promote Innovation Performance in Manufacturing Enterprises? The Mediating Role of R&D Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Wei, Shuang & Liu, Weihua & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Dong, Jing-xin & Long, Shangsong, 2024. "The influence of key components and digital technologies on manufacturer's choice of innovation strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1210-1220.
    16. Eliza Nichifor & Adrian Trifan & Elena Mihaela Nechifor, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence in Electronic Commerce: Basic Chatbots and Consumer Journey," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(56), pages 1-87, February.
    17. Arias-Pérez, José & Vélez-Jaramillo, Juan, 2022. "Ignoring the three-way interaction of digital orientation, Not-invented-here syndrome and employee's artificial intelligence awareness in digital innovation performance: A recipe for failure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Jeevan Jyoti & Himani Arora, 2013. "Impact of Client–Vendor Relationship on Firm’s Financial Performance: A Study of Outsourcing Firms," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 14(4), pages 691-709, December.
    19. Yongrok Choi & Xiaoxia Ye & Lu Zhao & Amanda C. Luo, 2016. "Optimizing enterprise risk management: a literature review and critical analysis of the work of Wu and Olson," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 281-300, February.
    20. Chan, Ken, 2023. "Outsourcing government relations: Use of outside lobbyists when in-house capacity exists," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 215-224.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:66:y:2023:i:1:p:109-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.