IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i1p872-d1024101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Intentions to Use Digital Mental Healthcare Content among University Students, Faculty, and Staff: Motivation, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Parasocial Interaction with AI Chatbot

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Y. Park

    (HY Digital Healthcare Center, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Hyungsook Kim

    (HY Digital Healthcare Center, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
    Department of Cognitive Sciences, School of Intelligence, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
    Graduate School of Public Policy, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Depression is a worldwide health issue to which various physical, psychological, and social health problems are attributable. To address the issue through the promotion of digital mental healthcare content use, this study examines factors influencing people’s intentions to use the content, guided by the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory. A total of 278 students and faculty/staff members at a Korean university tried using a digital mental healthcare content (e.g., artificial intelligence chatbot content) called MyMentalPocket and completed a survey questionnaire associated with their perceptions of the content. Participants’ depression levels, perceived usefulness, and parasocial interactions emerged as significant and positive factors influencing people’s intentions to use MyMentalPocket. Female gender, younger age, and specific motives for depression-related digital technology use (i.e., communication and emotional support, information- and guidance-seeking, and habitual entertainment-seeking motives) emerged as significant and positive factors influencing parasocial interactions. Parasocial interactions and perceived ease of use emerged as significant and positive factors influencing perceived usefulness. The findings from this study imply the utility of AI chatbots as a way to help people, especially females and younger people with depression and interpersonal difficulties, to utilize and benefit from digital mental healthcare content for depression management.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Y. Park & Hyungsook Kim, 2023. "Determinants of Intentions to Use Digital Mental Healthcare Content among University Students, Faculty, and Staff: Motivation, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Parasocial Interaction w," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:872-:d:1024101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/872/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/872/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Conal Twomey & Gary O’Reilly & Oliver Bültmann & Björn Meyer, 2020. "Effectiveness of a tailored, integrative Internet intervention (deprexis) for depression: Updated meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Ella Zomer & YongJoo Rhee & Danny Liew & Zanfina Ademi, 2021. "The Health and Productivity Burden of Depression in South Korea," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 941-951, November.
    3. Ying-Kai Liao & Wann-Yih Wu & Trang Quang Le & Thuy Thi Thu Phung, 2022. "The Integration of the Technology Acceptance Model and Value-Based Adoption Model to Study the Adoption of E-Learning: The Moderating Role of e-WOM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Se Jin Park & Soo Yeon Kim & Eun-Sun Lee & Subin Park, 2020. "Associations among Employment Status, Health Behaviors, and Mental Health in a Representative Sample of South Koreans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Kwang-Hi Park & Hyunlye Kim & Jaehee Kim, 2020. "Moderating Effect of Mindfulness on the Influence of Stress on Depression According to the Level of Stress among University Students in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-11, September.
    6. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    7. Sokolova, Karina & Perez, Charles, 2021. "You follow fitness influencers on YouTube. But do you actually exercise? How parasocial relationships, and watching fitness influencers, relate to intentions to exercise," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    8. Alvarez, R. Michael & Atkeson, Lonna Rae & Levin, Ines & Li, Yimeng, 2019. "Paying Attention to Inattentive Survey Respondents," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 145-162, April.
    9. Porter, Constance Elise & Donthu, Naveen, 2006. "Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 999-1007, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohd Shafie Rosli & Nor Shela Saleh & Azlah Md. Ali & Suaibah Abu Bakar, 2023. "Factors Determining the Acceptance of E-Wallet among Gen Z from the Lens of the Extended Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    2. Yang, Byunghwa & Kim, Youngchan & Yoo, Changjo, 2013. "The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology- and emotion-based evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1345-1352.
    3. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Wang, Shangrui & Cao, Anran & Wang, Guohua & Xiao, Yiming, 2022. "The Impact of energy poverty on the digital divide: The mediating effect of depression and Internet perception," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Bhattacharya, Mithu & Trinchera, Laura & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2017. "Role of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in user social media acceptance within workspace: Assessing unobserved heterogeneity," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 1-13.
    6. Radka Bauerová & Martin Klepek, 2017. "The Theoretical Framework for the Application of the TAM in Online Grocery Shopping," Working Papers 0044, Silesian University, School of Business Administration.
    7. Deepak Chawla & Himanshu Joshi, 2018. "The Moderating Effect of Demographic Variables on Mobile Banking Adoption: An Empirical Investigation," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3_suppl), pages 90-113, June.
    8. Brenda Mak & Robert C. Nickerson & Henri Isaac, 2009. "A Model Of Attitudes Towards The Acceptance Of Mobile Phone Use In Public Places," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 305-326.
    9. Julian M. Müller, 2019. "Comparing Technology Acceptance for Autonomous Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Car Sharing—A Study across Europe, China, and North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Mital, Monika & Chang, Victor & Choudhary, Praveen & Papa, Armando & Pani, Ashis K., 2018. "Adoption of Internet of Things in India: A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 339-346.
    11. Verhagen. T. & Feldberg, F. & Hooff, B. van den, 2008. "Explaining user adoption of virtual worlds: towards a multipurpose Explaining user adoption of virtual worlds: towards a multipurpose motivational model," Serie Research Memoranda 0006, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    12. Maria Tsourela & Dafni-Maria Nerantzaki, 2020. "An Internet of Things (IoT) Acceptance Model. Assessing Consumer’s Behavior toward IoT Products and Applications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, November.
    13. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Kerstin Pezoldt & Jana Schliewe, 2012. "Akzeptanz von Self-Service-Technologien: State of the Art," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 205-253, March.
    15. Nuno Calheiros-Lobo & José Vasconcelos Ferreira & Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira, 2023. "SME Internationalization and Export Performance: A Systematic Review with Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-36, May.
    16. Baier, Daniel & Stüber, Eva, 2010. "Acceptance of recommendations to buy in online retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 173-180.
    17. Yang, Chung-Shan, 2019. "Maritime shipping digitalization: Blockchain-based technology applications, future improvements, and intention to use," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 108-117.
    18. Weck, Marina & Afanassieva, Marianne, 2023. "Toward the adoption of digital assistive technology: Factors affecting older people's initial trust formation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2).
    19. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & J. Sánchez-Fernández, 2018. "A global approach to the analysis of user behavior in mobile payment systems in the new electronic environment," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(1), pages 25-64, March.
    20. V. Uma Maheswari & Uma Chandrasekaran, 2018. "Buying Insurance Online: Are we there yet?," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 9(2), pages 30-41, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:872-:d:1024101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.