IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14119-d1246514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Student Motivation and Engagement through a Gamified Learning Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos J. Hellín

    (Computer Science Department, University of Alcala, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain)

  • Francisco Calles-Esteban

    (Computer Science Department, University of Alcala, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain)

  • Adrián Valledor

    (Computer Science Department, University of Alcala, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain)

  • Josefa Gómez

    (Computer Science Department, University of Alcala, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain)

  • Salvador Otón-Tortosa

    (Computer Science Department, University of Alcala, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain)

  • Abdelhamid Tayebi

    (Computer Science Department, University of Alcala, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain)

Abstract

Gamification is a viable strategy used to enhance motivation and engagement in programming classes among students. However, automated evaluation capabilities, which are crucial for giving students fast and correct feedback, are frequently lacking in currently available gamification technologies. This study proposes a novel web-based application that combines automated programming assessment features with gamification concepts; the aim is to provide students taking a programming course with an engaging learning environment. A survey conducted with 215 undergraduate students assessed how the tool affected the motivation and engagement of students. The findings show that the tool had a beneficial impact on students’ willingness to participate in class, study, increase their self-confidence, engage in healthy competition with peers, and learn from their mistakes. The qualitative feedback that students offered regarding the features of the tool that they liked best is also covered in the study. This paper contributes to the field of programming education by presenting a detailed gamified tool, incorporating automated evaluation and gamification in a web-based platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos J. Hellín & Francisco Calles-Esteban & Adrián Valledor & Josefa Gómez & Salvador Otón-Tortosa & Abdelhamid Tayebi, 2023. "Enhancing Student Motivation and Engagement through a Gamified Learning Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14119-:d:1246514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14119/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14119/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barabas, Jason & Jerit, Jennifer, 2010. "Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 104(2), pages 226-242, May.
    2. Vacius Jusas & Dominykas Barisas & Mindaugas Jančiukas, 2022. "Game Elements towards More Sustainable Learning in Object-Oriented Programming Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Fahd Kamis Alzahrani & Waleed Salim Alhalafawy, 2023. "Gamification for Learning Sustainability in the Blackboard System: Motivators and Obstacles from Faculty Members’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lergetporer, Philipp & Schwerdt, Guido & Werner, Katharina & West, Martin R. & Woessmann, Ludger, 2018. "How information affects support for education spending: Evidence from survey experiments in Germany and the United States," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 138-157.
    2. Jiawei Fu & Xiaojun Li, 2024. "Generalization Issues in Experiments Involving Multidimensional Decisions," Papers 2405.06779, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    3. Hicken, Allen & Leider, Stephen & Ravanilla, Nico & Yang, Dean, 2018. "Temptation in vote-selling: Evidence from a field experiment in the Philippines," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-14.
    4. repec:gig:joupla:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:45-81 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Lergetporer, Philipp & Piopiunik, Marc & Simon, Lisa, 2021. "Does the education level of refugees affect natives’ attitudes?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. David A. Steinberg & Yeling Tan, 2023. "Public responses to foreign protectionism: Evidence from the US-China trade war," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 145-167, January.
    7. David H. Bearce & Thomas R. Cook, 2018. "The first image reversed: IGO signals and mass political attitudes," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 595-619, December.
    8. Philipp Lergetporer & Guido Schwerdt & Katharina Werner & Ludger Woessmann, 2016. "Information and Preferences for Public Spending: Evidence from Representative Survey Experiments," CESifo Working Paper Series 5938, CESifo.
    9. Kuehnhanss, Colin R. & Heyndels, Bruno, 2018. "All’s fair in taxation: A framing experiment with local politicians," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 26-40.
    10. Lui-Kwan Ng & Chung-Kwan Lo, 2022. "Flipped Classroom and Gamification Approach: Its Impact on Performance and Academic Commitment on Sustainable Learning in Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Bratton, Michael, 2013. "Measuring Government Performance in Public Opinion Surveys in Africa: Towards Experiments?," WIDER Working Paper Series 023, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Angino, Siria & Secola, Stefania, 2022. "Instinctive versus reflective trust in the European Central Bank," Working Paper Series 2660, European Central Bank.
    13. Grewenig, Elisabeth & Lergetporer, Philipp & Werner, Katharina & Woessmann, Ludger, 2020. "Do party positions affect the public's policy preferences? Experimental evidence on support for family policies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 523-543.
    14. Brilé Anderson & Thomas Bernauer & Stefano Balietti, 2017. "Effects of fairness principles on willingness to pay for climate change mitigation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 447-461, June.
    15. Busemeyer, Marius R. & Lergetporer, Philipp & Woessmann, Ludger, 2018. "Public opinion and the political economy of educational reforms: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 161-185.
    16. Noemí Rodríguez & Francisco Yebra & Aida Dopico & Eva Garcia-Vazquez & Eduardo Dopico, 2024. "Blue Gold , Game-Based Learning to Encourage Sustainable Consumption: The Case of Mobile Phones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, January.
    17. Cascavilla, Alessandro, 2022. "Does climate change concern alter tax morale preferences? Evidence from an Italian survey," MPRA Paper 113039, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Lala Muradova & Ross James Gildea, 2021. "Oil wealth and US public support for war," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(1), pages 3-19, January.
    19. Caspersen, Joakim & Paulsen, Veronika, 2023. "Discretionary decision making in child welfare – An experimental vignette study of the use of interpreter services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Mohammad H. Al-khresheh & Taha O. Alkursheh, 2024. "An integrated model exploring the relationship between self-efficacy, technology integration via Blackboard, English proficiency, and Saudi EFL students’ academic achievement," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    21. Miquel Pellicer & Patrizio Piraino & Eva Wegner, 2014. "Information, mobilization, and demand for redistribution: A survey experiment in South Africa," SALDRU Working Papers 139, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14119-:d:1246514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.