IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13862-d1242434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review on the Way Forward in Construction through Industrial Revolution 5.0

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Ali Musarat

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
    Offshore Engineering Centre, Institute of Autonomous System, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Muhammad Irfan

    (Civil Engineering Department, HITEC University, Taxila 47080, Pakistan)

  • Wesam Salah Alaloul

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Ahsen Maqsoom

    (Department of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad Wah Campus, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan)

  • Maria Ghufran

    (Department of Construction Engineering and Management, National University of Sciences and Technology (N.U.S.T.), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

Abstract

The growing concept of Industry 5.0 (IR 5.0) has enhanced the study horizon of the technology-centered Industry 4.0 (IR 4.0) to an intelligent and balanced socioeconomic change powered mutually by people and technologies. The role of humans in the technological revolution is largely focused on IR 5.0, which is already a future trend. IR 4.0’s cyber–physical systems revolution has evolved into IR 5.0, or in other words, from machine-to-machine integration to human-to-machine integration, which is radically altering how people live, work, and interact with one another. Therefore, the current study aims to comprehensively review transformation through industrial revolutions and provide a way forward in the construction industry with the incorporation of IR 5.0. This study has used a narrative-based research methodology in which multiple databases such as Scopus, Web of Sciences, Google Scholar, and Science Direct have been utilized for extracting articles related to the subject area of the current study. Moreover, through narrative-based methodology, which is a generic-based review technique, the information gathered from multiple sources has been summarized and synthesized. The findings of the review indicate that resilience, human-centricity, economic efficiency, and sustainable development are the key characteristics of IR 5.0. Moreover, the adoption of IR 5.0 in the construction industry also faces some major challenges such as a shortage of IR 5.0-related technical skills, investment-hesitancy among investors, security, and cultural concerns for human-to-machine integration, and an unavailability of data for effective decision-making for governments and stakeholders. The study results also highlight that with selective technology adoption, project teams embracing IR 5.0 for improved collaboration and coordination, more environmentally friendly technology adoption through human-to-machine collaboration, and stakeholders leveraging the power of human knowledge and innovative proficiency through machines, reforms can be brought into the construction industry through the incorporation of IR 5.0. It is also important to keep in mind that adopting IR 4.0 is still difficult in some areas and it may seem like achieving IR 5.0 will require years of effort and significant cultural change; however, it needs to be considered right away. The effects of disruptive technologies on Industry 4.0 are covered in several studies; however, IR 5.0 is a novel idea that is still in its early stages, thus its consequences have not been well examined in the construction industry. Therefore, the current study has expanded the body of knowledge on this important subject in detail and has comprehensively explained the transformation by providing a way forward for the adoption of IR 5.0 in the construction industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Ali Musarat & Muhammad Irfan & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Ahsen Maqsoom & Maria Ghufran, 2023. "A Review on the Way Forward in Construction through Industrial Revolution 5.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13862-:d:1242434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13862/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13862/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josef Taalbi, 2019. "Origins and pathways of innovation in the third industrial revolution1," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(5), pages 1125-1148.
    2. Maria C Tavares & Graça Azevedo & Rui P. Marques, 2022. "The Challenges and Opportunities of Era 5.0 for a More Humanistic and Sustainable Society—A Literature Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Andrew Atkeson & Patrick J. Kehoe, 2002. "The transition to a new economy after the Second Industrial Revolution," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Nov.
    4. Thi Lan Anh Vu & Tien Quoc Le, 2019. "Development Orientation For Higher Education Training Programme Of Mechanical Engineering In Industrial Revolution 4.0: A Perspective In Vietnam," Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research & Developments (JMERD), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 71-73, January.
    5. Muhammad Ali Musarat & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Lau Siew Cher & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Aawag Mohsen Alawag & Abdullah O. Baarimah, 2023. "Applications of Building Information Modelling in the Operation and Maintenance Phase of Construction Projects: A Framework for the Malaysian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Muhammad Ali Musarat & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Nasir Hameed & Dhinaharan R & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Mohamed Mubarak Abdul Wahab, 2022. "Efficient Construction Waste Management: A Solution through Industrial Revolution (IR) 4.0 Evaluated by AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Muhammad Ali Musarat & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Irfan & Pravin Sreenivasan & Muhammad Babar Ali Rabbani, 2022. "Health and Safety Improvement through Industrial Revolution 4.0: Malaysian Construction Industry Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Wieslaw Grebski, 2022. "Knowledge and Skills Development in the Context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies: Interviews of Experts from Pennsylvania State of the USA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Paweł Poszytek, 2021. "The Landscape of Scientific Discussions on the Competencies 4.0 Concept in the Context of the 4th Industrial Revolution—A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana M. Osorio & Luisa F. Úsuga & Jaime A. Restrepo-Carmona & Isabel Rendón & Julián Sierra-Pérez & Rafael E. Vásquez, 2024. "Methodology for Stakeholder Prioritization in the Context of Digital Transformation and Society 5.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, June.
    2. César Ramírez-Márquez & Thelma Posadas-Paredes & Alma Yunuen Raya-Tapia & José María Ponce-Ortega, 2024. "Natural Resource Optimization and Sustainability in Society 5.0: A Comprehensive Review," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Ali Musarat & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Lau Siew Cher & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Aawag Mohsen Alawag & Abdullah O. Baarimah, 2023. "Applications of Building Information Modelling in the Operation and Maintenance Phase of Construction Projects: A Framework for the Malaysian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Ahn, Sanghoon, 2003. "Technology Upgrading with Learning Cost," CEI Working Paper Series 2003-21, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    3. Eliasson, Gunnar & Johansson, Dan & Taymaz, Erol, 2004. "Simulating the New Economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 289-314, September.
    4. Boyan Jovanovic & Peter L. Rousseau, 2008. "Mergers as Reallocation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 90(4), pages 765-776, November.
    5. Rodolfo E. Manuelli & Ananth Seshadri, 2014. "Frictionless Technology Diffusion: The Case of Tractors," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(4), pages 1368-1391, April.
    6. Howell, Bronwyn & Obren, Mark, 2003. "Telecommunications Usage in New Zealand: 1993-2003," Working Paper Series 3886, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    7. repec:vuw:vuwscr:18983 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Amjad Almusaed & Ibrahim Yitmen & Asaad Almssad, 2023. "Reviewing and Integrating AEC Practices into Industry 6.0: Strategies for Smart and Sustainable Future-Built Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Hornstein, Andreas & Krusell, Per & Violante, Giovanni L., 2005. "The Effects of Technical Change on Labor Market Inequalities," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 20, pages 1275-1370, Elsevier.
    10. Yulia Gruzina & Irina Firsova & Wadim Strielkowski, 2021. "Dynamics of Human Capital Development in Economic Development Cycles," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Thomas Cooley & Ramon Marimon & Vincenzo Quadrini, 2004. "Aggregate Consequences of Limited Contract Enforceability," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(4), pages 817-847, August.
    12. Mounir Dahmani & Mohamed Mabrouki & Adel Ben Youssef, 2022. "ICT, trade openness and economic growth in Tunisia: what is going wrong?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 2317-2336, November.
    13. Jesús Rodríguez-Molina & José-Fernán Martínez & Pedro Castillejo & Gregorio Rubio, 2017. "Development of Middleware Applied to Microgrids by Means of an Open Source Enterprise Service Bus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-50, February.
    14. Abhishek Borah & Francesca Bonetti & Angelito Calma & José Martí-Parreño, 2023. "The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science at 50: A historical analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 222-243, January.
    15. Chen, Kaiji & Song, Zheng, 2013. "Financial frictions on capital allocation: A transmission mechanism of TFP fluctuations," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 683-703.
    16. Luboš Pástor & Pietro Veronesi, 2009. "Technological Revolutions and Stock Prices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1451-1483, September.
    17. Kaiji Chen & Zheng Song & Yikai Wang, 2010. "Precautionary corporate liquidity," IEW - Working Papers 465, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    18. Gabriela Ioana ENACHE, 2023. "The Impact of Society 5.0 on Supply Chain Management: Opportunities and Challenges," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(2), pages 280-292, May.
    19. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2021. "Third Industrial Revolution Brings Global Development," MPRA Paper 110972, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 Sep 2021.
    20. Dragos TOHANEAN & Sorin-George TOMA, 2018. "Innovation, A Key Element Of Business Models In The Fourth Industrial Revolution," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 12, pages 121-130, December.
    21. Crowley-Vigneau, Anne & Kalyuzhnova, Yelena & Ketenci, Natalya, 2023. "What motivates the ‘green’ transition: Russian and European perspectives," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13862-:d:1242434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.