IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p12739-d1222956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Family Supportive Supervisor Behavior on Employees’ Proactive Behavior: A Cognitive and Affective Integration Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Chuanhao Fan

    (School of Business, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
    Institute of Human Resources of the Ministry of Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Chunlan Ye

    (School of Business, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Long Zhang

    (Institute of Human Resources of the Ministry of Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, China
    College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Yao Gong

    (School of Business, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

Abstract

With the increasing complexity of the external organizational environment, employees’ proactive behavior has become a critical factor for organizational success. However, there is limited research exploring the mechanisms behind employees’ proactive behavior from the perspective of family supportive supervisor behavior, which satisfies employees’ work–family balance. Based on the Cognitive–Affective Personality System theory and in the context of escalating work–family conflict and the Chinese cultural context, which emphasizes reciprocity, this study collected survey data from 535 employees in two stages. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between family supportive supervisor behavior and employees’ proactive behavior. The results show that family supportive supervisor behavior has a positive impact on employees’ proactive behavior; perceived insider status and affective commitment partially mediate the impact of family supportive supervisor behavior on employees’ proactive behavior; and perceived insider status and affective commitment play chain-mediating roles in the influence of family supportive supervisor behavior on employees’ proactive behavior. This study innovatively reveals the “black box” of the relationship between family supportive supervisor behavior and employees’ proactive behavior from the internal perspective of individual cognition–emotion. This expands the research on the consequences of family supportive supervisor behavior in the work field and provides inspiration for enterprises on how to motivate employees’ proactive behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuanhao Fan & Chunlan Ye & Long Zhang & Yao Gong, 2023. "The Impact of Family Supportive Supervisor Behavior on Employees’ Proactive Behavior: A Cognitive and Affective Integration Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12739-:d:1222956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12739/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12739/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiao-Yu Liu & Ho Kwong Kwan & Xiaomeng Zhang, 2020. "Introverts maintain creativity: A resource depletion model of negative workplace gossip," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 325-344, March.
    2. Shuxia Zhang & Yidong Tu, 2018. "Cross-Domain Effects of Ethical Leadership on Employee Family and Life Satisfaction: the Moderating Role of Family-Supportive Supervisor Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1085-1097, November.
    3. Talya Bauer & Serge Perrot & Robert Liden & Berrin Erdogan, 2019. "Understanding the consequences of newcomers proactive behaviors: the moderating contextual role of servant leadership," Post-Print hal-02305810, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdaline Enow Mbi Tarkang Mary & Ali Ozturen, 2019. "Sustainable Ethical Leadership and Employee Outcomes in the Hotel Industry in Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Shuoli Wang & Yanping Li & Yidong Tu, 2019. "Linking Proactive Personality to Life Satisfaction in the Chinese Context: The Mediation of Interpersonal Trust and Moderation of Positive Reciprocity Beliefs," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 2471-2488, December.
    3. Boqiang Zong & Elena Martinescu & Bianca Beersma & Shiyong Xu & Lihua Zhang, 2024. "How Multi-Source Gossip Affects Targets’ Emotions and Strategic Behavioral Responses," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 385-402, January.
    4. Bao Cheng & Yan Peng & Ahmed Shaalan & Marwa Tourky, 2023. "The Hidden Costs of Negative Workplace Gossip: Its Effect on Targets’ Behaviors, the Mediating Role of Guanxi Closeness, and the Moderating Effect of Need for Affiliation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 287-302, January.
    5. Pen-Yuan Liao, 2021. "Linking Proactive Personality to Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Person-Environment Fit," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    6. Abbas Ali Abdulhassan, 2022. "The Role of Organizational Virtuousness in Reinforcement Proactive Work Behavior," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 87(1), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Satria Maulana Putra & Mahdani Ibrahim & Amri, 2020. "The Effects of Organizational Socialization Tactics on Newcomer Job Satisfaction and Engagement: Does Core Self-Evaluation Important?," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 8(1), pages 558-568, June.
    8. Rofcanin, Yasin & Heras, Mireia Las & Bosch, Maria Jose & Berber, Aykut & Mughal, Farooq & Ozturk, Mustafa, 2021. "Servant leadership and family supportiveness: Looking into employees’ work and family outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 70-82.
    9. Lan Lin & Yuntao Bai, 2023. "The Dual Spillover Spiraling Effects of Family Incivility on Workplace Interpersonal Deviance: From the Conservation of Resources Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 725-740, May.
    10. Bao Cheng & Yun Dong & Zhenduo Zhang & Ahmed Shaalan & Gongxing Guo & Yan Peng, 2022. "When Targets Strike Back: How Negative Workplace Gossip Triggers Political Acts by Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 289-302, January.
    11. Ziyang Qiang & Jigan Wang & Kaiyuan He & Lin Xu, 2022. "Potential of Passive Employees: How Servant Leadership Can Stimulate Innovation among Control-Oriented Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Vanessa Begemann & Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock & Maie Stein, 2023. "Peeling Away the Layers of Workplace Gossip: A Framework, Review, and Future Research Agenda to Study Workplace Gossip as a Dynamic and Complex Behavior," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Yahua Cai & Fufu Sun & Jingsong Li, 2024. "Following the abusive leader? When and how abusive supervision influences victim’s creativity through observers," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 679-700, June.
    14. Rezwan Ullah & Muhammad Zada & Imran Saeed & Jawad Khan & Muhammad Shahbaz & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda, 2021. "Have You Heard That—“GOSSIP”? Gossip Spreads Rapidly and Influences Broadly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Yangxin Wang & Dora C. Lau, 2022. "How and why job crafting influences creative performance? A resource allocation explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1561-1587, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12739-:d:1222956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.