IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p12087-d1212210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Distribution and Contamination Risk Assessment of Cu and Zn in Municipal Sewage Sludge

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Jakubus

    (Department of Soil Science and Microbiology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60-656 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

One of the methods of managing sewage sludge (SS) is its soil application. This possibility is promoted by the chemical composition rich in organic matter and nutrients. However, heavy metal contents in SS must meet respective permissible limits. Among the heavy metals in SS, Cu and Zn are found in the largest amount; thus, this study focuses on these elements. The main aim of the study is to investigate the quantitative distribution of metals in sequentially separated fractions of sewage sludge. Additionally, the potential risk of environmental contamination with heavy metals was assessed in the case of SS application for agricultural purposes. The relevant analyses were conducted on four different examples of municipal SS. Based on the total amounts as well as those determined in the SS fractions, the following indices were calculated: I geo (geoaccumulation index), ICF, (individual contamination factor), and RAC (risk assessment code). The use of data from the sequential analysis as well as the calculated indices made it possible to assess the usefulness of SS in practice in terms of potential introduction of Cu and Zn into the environment with the sludge dose. It was found that total Cu (Cu tot ) and Zn (Zn tot ) did not exceed the permissible limits binding within respective Polish and international regulations. Regardless of the years of study and the analyzed SS, Cu tot ranged from 260.9 to 393.5 mg·kg −1 , and Zn tot from 475.5 to 1153.1 mg·kg −1 . The amounts of Cu and Zn were predominantly reducible (bound to iron and manganese hydroxides, Fr. II) and oxidizable complexes (bound to organic matter and sulfides, Fr. III). The average amounts of Cu in Fr. II ranged from 149.4 to 172.4 mg·kg −1 , while those of Zn in Fr. II ranged from 370.9 to 754.6 mg·kg −1 . Cu amounts in Fr. III were from 160.9 to 183 mg·kg −1 and Zn amounts in Fr. III were from 104.9 to 171.9 mg·kg −1 . Total content of metals as well as TOC values strongly determined the quantitative level of both elements in the SS fractions. Generally, with the increase in the total amount of metals, their levels in the sludge fractions increased. In turn, the increase in TOC resulted in a decrease in the amounts of Cu and Zn in the sludge fractions. Calculated I geo and ICF ratios showed high and very high SS contamination with Cu and Zn. I geo values for Cu, regardless of the year of study and sludge sample, that ranged from 4.62 to 5.43 and for Zn from 3.41 to 4.86. At the same time, the ICF values for Cu ranged from 8.59–23.04, and for Zn 15.42–44.47. The RAC values indicated a low (Cu) and medium (Zn) risk of using SS in terms of the potential metal availability in the environment. The RAC values ranged from 1.46 to 4.40% for Cu and from 9.63 to 23.13% for Zn.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Jakubus, 2023. "Quantitative Distribution and Contamination Risk Assessment of Cu and Zn in Municipal Sewage Sludge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12087-:d:1212210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12087/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12087/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sina Shaddel & Hamidreza Bakhtiary-Davijany & Christian Kabbe & Farbod Dadgar & Stein W. Østerhus, 2019. "Sustainable Sewage Sludge Management: From Current Practices to Emerging Nutrient Recovery Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Maria Cristina Collivignarelli & Alessandro Abbà & Andrea Frattarola & Marco Carnevale Miino & Sergio Padovani & Ioannis Katsoyiannis & Vincenzo Torretta, 2019. "Legislation for the Reuse of Biosolids on Agricultural Land in Europe: Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monika Jakubus, 2024. "Current Trends in Sustainable Sewage Sludge Management—A Case Study for Poznań County, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Milojevic & Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, 2021. "Agricultural Use of Sewage Sludge as a Threat of Microplastic (MP) Spread in the Environment and the Role of Governance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Zhai, Jihua & Burke, Ian T. & Stewart, Douglas I., 2021. "Beneficial management of biomass combustion ashes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    3. Viola Somogyi & Viktória Pitás & Kinga M. Berta & Róbert Kurdi, 2022. "Red Mud as Adsorbent to Recover Phosphorous from Wastewater Streams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Giuseppe Campo & Alberto Cerutti & Claudio Lastella & Aldo Leo & Deborah Panepinto & Mariachiara Zanetti & Barbara Ruffino, 2021. "Production and Destination of Sewage Sludge in the Piemonte Region (Italy): The Results of a Survey for a Future Sustainable Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Magdalena Szymańska & Tomasz Sosulski & Ewa Szara & Adam Wąs & Piotr Sulewski & Gijs W.P. van Pruissen & René L. Cornelissen, 2019. "Ammonium Sulphate from a Bio-Refinery System as a Fertilizer—Agronomic and Economic Effectiveness on the Farm Scale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Salah Jellali & Yassine Charabi & Muhammad Usman & Abdullah Al-Badi & Mejdi Jeguirim, 2021. "Investigations on Biogas Recovery from Anaerobic Digestion of Raw Sludge and Its Mixture with Agri-Food Wastes: Application to the Largest Industrial Estate in Oman," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Vito Horvatić & Helena Bakić Begić & Davor Romić & Marko Černe & Smiljana Goreta Ban & Monika Zovko & Marija Romić, 2021. "Evaluation of Land Potential for Use of Biosolids in the Coastal Mediterranean Karst Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Ana Simoes-Mota & Rosa Maria Poch & Alberto Enrique & Luis Orcaray & Iñigo Virto, 2021. "Soil Quality Assessment after 25 Years of Sewage Sludge vs. Mineral Fertilization in a Calcareous Soil," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Tanaka Mandy Mbavarira & Christine Grimm, 2021. "A Systemic View on Circular Economy in the Water Industry: Learnings from a Belgian and Dutch Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-62, March.
    10. Nidhal Marzougui & Nadia Ounalli & Sonia Sabbahi & Tarek Fezzani & Farah Abidi & Sihem Jebari & Sourour Melki & Ronny Berndtsson & Walid Oueslati, 2022. "How Can Sewage Sludge Use in Sustainable Tunisian Agriculture Be Increased?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    11. David Palma-Heredia & Manel Poch & Miquel À. Cugueró-Escofet, 2020. "Implementation of a Decision Support System for Sewage Sludge Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Derick Lima & Gregory Appleby & Li Li, 2023. "A Scoping Review of Options for Increasing Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge: Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing Energy Self-Sufficiency in Wastewater Treatment Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, March.
    13. Oumaima Mabrouk & Helmi Hamdi & Sami Sayadi & Mohammad A. Al-Ghouti & Mohammed H. Abu-Dieyeh & Nabil Zouari, 2023. "Reuse of Sludge as Organic Soil Amendment: Insights into the Current Situation and Potential Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, April.
    14. Niklas Widderich & Natalie Mayer & Anna Joelle Ruff & Bernd Reckels & Florian Lohkamp & Christian Visscher & Ulrich Schwaneberg & Martin Kaltschmitt & Andreas Liese & Paul Bubenheim, 2022. "Conditioning of Feed Material Prior to Feeding: Approaches for a Sustainable Phosphorus Utilization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Marzena Smol & Michał Preisner & Augusto Bianchini & Jessica Rossi & Ludwig Hermann & Tanja Schaaf & Jolita Kruopienė & Kastytis Pamakštys & Maris Klavins & Ruta Ozola-Davidane & Daina Kalnina & Elina, 2020. "Strategies for Sustainable and Circular Management of Phosphorus in the Baltic Sea Region: The Holistic Approach of the InPhos Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Sigrid Kusch-Brandt & Mohammad A. T. Alsheyab, 2021. "Wastewater Refinery: Producing Multiple Valuable Outputs from Wastewater," J, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, February.
    17. Maria Cristina Collivignarelli & Alessandro Abbà & Marco Carnevale Miino & Vincenzo Torretta & Elena Cristina Rada & Francesca Maria Caccamo & Sabrina Sorlini, 2020. "Adsorption of Fluorides in Drinking Water by Palm Residues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, May.
    18. Marcin Dębowski & Marcin Zieliński, 2020. "Technological Effectiveness of Sugar-Industry Effluent Methane Fermentation in a Fluidized Active Filling Reactor (FAF-R)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Di Capua, Francesco & Spasiano, Danilo & Giordano, Andrea & Adani, Fabrizio & Fratino, Umberto & Pirozzi, Francesco & Esposito, Giovanni, 2020. "High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: challenges and opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    20. Gabriele Di Giacomo & Pietro Romano, 2022. "Evolution and Prospects in Managing Sewage Sludge Resulting from Municipal Wastewater Purification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-33, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12087-:d:1212210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.