IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11395-d1199941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Value Chain Analysis of Cauliflower and Tomato in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Dabasis Sharma

    (Department of Agricultural Marketing and Business Management, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh)

  • Mohammad Jahangir Alam

    (Department of Agribusiness and Marketing, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • Ismat Ara Begum

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • Shijun Ding

    (School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China)

  • Andrew M. McKenzie

    (Department of Agribusiness and Agricultural Economics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

Abstract

Improved agricultural value chains linking rural and urban areas can provide opportunities to initiate development interventions. This paper was aimed at mapping the value chain of cauliflower and tomato along with the identification of internal and external governance structures throughout the chain. Data were collected from 100 farmers and 60 traders, selected through the application of simple random and purposive sampling, respectively. Value chain mapping techniques and marketing margins were used for evaluating the economic performance of each actor. To uncover the farmers’ perceptions of internal and external governance structures, the Likert scaling technique was utilized, which was checked by applying the Mann–Whitney U test. Eleven marketing channels were ascertained for cauliflower and tomato, whereas wholesalers contributed the largest share of gross (32.28% for cauliflower and 31.96% for tomato) and net (57.41% for cauliflower and 48.09% for tomato) marketing margins. The highest return on investment was obtained by Aratdars. The lowest amount of cauliflower (1.51%) and tomato (1.30%) were responsible for direct marketing. The benefit–cost ratio was found to be 1.30 and 1.25, respectively, for cauliflower and tomato. This paper revealed considerable differences among NATP and non-NATP farmers with regard to internal and external governance practices. Despite both groups reporting good internal governance practices from their own perspectives, the negative attitude of NATP and non-NATP farmers toward the existence of good external governance practices created a matter of deep concern. To ensure the farmers’ benefits, good governance practices must be implemented throughout the value chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Dabasis Sharma & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Ismat Ara Begum & Shijun Ding & Andrew M. McKenzie, 2023. "A Value Chain Analysis of Cauliflower and Tomato in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11395-:d:1199941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11395/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11395/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giacomo Branca & Luca Cacchiarelli & Valentina D’Amico & Laifolo Dakishoni & Esther Lupafya & Mufunanji Magalasi & Chiara Perelli & Alessandro Sorrentino, 2021. "Cereal-Legume Value Chain Analysis: A Case of Smallholder Production in Selected Areas of Malawi," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Emana, Bezabih & Afari-Sefa, Victor & Dinssa, Fekadu F. & Ayana, Amsalu & Balemi, Tesfaye & Temesgen, Milkessa, 2015. "Characterization and Assessment of Vegetable Production and Marketing Systems in the Humid Tropics of Ethiopia," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 54(2), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Schiffer, Eva & Hartwich, Frank & Monge, Mario, 2010. "Who has influence in multistakeholder governance systems?," IFPRI discussion papers 964, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Antonella Samoggia & Francesca Monticone & Gianandrea Esposito, 2022. "Governance in the Italian Processed Tomato Value Chain: The Case for an Interbranch Organisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Chagomoka, Takemore & Afari-Sefa, Victor & Pitoro, Raul, 2014. "Value Chain Analysis of Traditional Vegetables from Malawi and Mozambique," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1-28, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oukula Obsa & Menfese Tadesse & Dong-Gill Kim & Zeleke Asaye & Fantaw Yimer & Mersha Gebrehiwot & Nicolas Brüggemann & Katharina Prost, 2022. "Organic Waste Generation and Its Valorization Potential through Composting in Shashemene, Southern Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Alberto B. Charrua & Philip J. Havik & Salomão Bandeira & Luís Catarino & Ana Ribeiro-Barros & Pedro Cabral & Margarida Moldão & Maria M. Romeiras, 2021. "Food Security and Nutrition in Mozambique: Comparative Study with Bean Species Commercialised in Informal Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Jean-Philippe Berrou & Alain Piveteau & Thibaud Deguilhem & Leo Delpy & Claire Gondard-Delcroix, 2021. "Who Drives if No-one Governs? A Social Network Analysis of Social Protection Policy in Madagascar," Working Papers hal-03180029, HAL.
    4. Kamrath, Carolin & Rajendran, Srinivasulu & Nenguwo, Ngoni & Afari-Sefa, Victor & Broring, Stefanie, 2018. "Adoption behavior of market traders: an analysis based on Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(6), July.
    5. Gennifer Meldrum & Stefano Padulosi & Gaia Lochetti & Rose Robitaille & Stefano Diulgheroff, 2018. "Issues and Prospects for the Sustainable Use and Conservation of Cultivated Vegetable Diversity for More Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Ming Zhu & Ruihua Yang, 2023. "The Impact of Agricultural Insurance on Farmers’ Enthusiasm for Sugarcane Production: Evidence from Guangxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Lukáš Čechura & Antonella Samoggia & Tinoush Jamali Jaghdani, 2024. "Concentration, market imperfections, and interbranch organization in the Italian processed tomato supply chain," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(4), pages 603-620, July.
    8. Ratner, B. D. & Larson, A. M. & Barletti, J. P. S. & ElDidi, H. & Catacutan, D. & Flintan, F. & Suhardiman, Diana & Falk, T. & Meinzen-Dick, R., 2022. "Multistakeholder platforms for natural resource governance: lessons from eight landscape-level cases," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-27(2):2..
    9. Olivier Walther, 2015. "Social Network Analysis and informal trade," Working Papers 4, University of Southern Denmark, Centre for Border Region Studies.
    10. Zoe Nomakhushe Nxusani & Mthokozisi Kwazi Zuma & Xikombiso Gertrude Mbhenyane, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Indigenous Food Plant Usage in Southern Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    11. Dizyee, Kanar & Baker, Derek & Herrero, Mario & Burrow, Heather & McMillan, Larelle & Sila, Daniel Ndaka & Rich, Karl M., 2020. "The promotion of amaranth value chains for livelihood enhancement in East Africa: A systems modelling approach," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(2), June.
    12. Jalang'o, Dorcas Anyango, 2016. "Economic Analysis Of Smallholder Farmers’ Participation In Domestic High-Value Markets For Indigenous Vegetables In Siaya County, Kenya," Research Theses 276431, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    13. Learnmore Mwadzingeni & Victor Afari-Sefa & Hussein Shimelis & Sognigbé N’Danikou & Sandiswa Figlan & Lutz Depenbusch & Admire I.T. Shayanowako & Takemore Chagomoka & Malven Mushayi & Pepijn Schreinem, 2021. "Unpacking the value of traditional African vegetables for food and nutrition security," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(5), pages 1215-1226, October.
    14. Donovan, Jason & Gelli, Aulo, 2019. "Designing interventions in local value chains for improved health and nutrition: Insights from Malawi," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    15. Admire Isaac Tichafa Shayanowako & Oliver Morrissey & Alberto Tanzi & Maud Muchuweti & Guillermina M. Mendiondo & Sean Mayes & Albert T. Modi & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2021. "African Leafy Vegetables for Improved Human Nutrition and Food System Resilience in Southern Africa: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Amba Shalishe & Anirudh Bhowmick & Kumneger Elias, 2023. "Agricultural drought analysis and its association among land surface temperature, soil moisture and precipitation in Gamo Zone, Southern Ethiopia: a remote sensing approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 57-70, May.
    17. Jing Wei & Yongping Wei & Fuqiang Tian & Yonglan Xiong & Hongchang Hu, 2023. "Transition in the societal value and governance of water resources in Australia and China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Giacomo Branca & Luca Cacchiarelli & Valentina D’Amico & Laifolo Dakishoni & Esther Lupafya & Mufunanji Magalasi & Chiara Perelli & Alessandro Sorrentino, 2021. "Cereal-Legume Value Chain Analysis: A Case of Smallholder Production in Selected Areas of Malawi," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Joko Mariyono & Apri Kuntariningsih & Hanik A. Dewi & Evi Latifah, 2017. "Pathway analysis of vegetable farming commercialization," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 9(2), pages 115-124, April.
    20. Bradley Ridoutt & Jessica R. Bogard & Kanar Dizyee & Lilly Lim-Camacho & Shalander Kumar, 2019. "Value Chains and Diet Quality: A Review of Impact Pathways and Intervention Strategies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11395-:d:1199941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.