IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p10968-d1192966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning Methods for Woody Volume Prediction in Eucalyptus

Author

Listed:
  • Dthenifer Cordeiro Santana

    (Department of Agronomy, State University of São Paulo (UNESP), Ilha Solteira 15385-000, SP, Brazil)

  • Regimar Garcia dos Santos

    (Department of Agronomy, State University of São Paulo (UNESP), Ilha Solteira 15385-000, SP, Brazil)

  • Pedro Henrique Neves da Silva

    (Faculty of Computing, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil)

  • Hemerson Pistori

    (Faculty of Computing, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil
    Department of Computer Engineering, Universidade Católica Dom Bosco (UCDB), Campo Grande 79117-900, MS, Brazil)

  • Larissa Pereira Ribeiro Teodoro

    (Campus de Chapadão do Sul, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Chapadão do Sul 79560-000, MS, Brazil)

  • Nerison Luis Poersch

    (Department of Agronomy, Federal University of Fronteira do Sul (UFFS), Cerro Largo 97900-000, RS, Brazil)

  • Gileno Brito de Azevedo

    (Campus de Chapadão do Sul, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Chapadão do Sul 79560-000, MS, Brazil)

  • Glauce Taís de Oliveira Sousa Azevedo

    (Campus de Chapadão do Sul, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Chapadão do Sul 79560-000, MS, Brazil)

  • Carlos Antonio da Silva Junior

    (Department of Geography, State University of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), Sinop 78555-000, MT, Brazil)

  • Paulo Eduardo Teodoro

    (Campus de Chapadão do Sul, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Chapadão do Sul 79560-000, MS, Brazil)

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) algorithms can be used to predict wood volume in a faster and more accurate way, providing reliable answers in forest inventories. The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of different ML techniques to predict the volume of eucalyptus wood, using diameter at breast height (DBH) and total height (Ht) as input variables, obtained by measuring DBH and Ht of 72 trees of six eucalyptus species ( Eucalyptus camaldulensis , E. uroplylla , E. saligna , E. grandis , E. urograndis , and Corymbria citriodora ). The trees were cut down in two different epochs, rendering 48 samples at 24 months and 24 samples at 48 months, and the volume of each tree was measured using the Smailian method. This research explores five machine learning models, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), multiple linear regression (LR), random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM), to estimate the volume of eucalyptus wood using DBH and Ht. Artificial neural networks achieved higher correlations between observed and estimated wood volume values. However, the RF outperformed all models by providing lower MAE and higher correlations between observed and estimated wood volume values. Therefore, RF is the most accurate for predicting wood volume in eucalyptus species.

Suggested Citation

  • Dthenifer Cordeiro Santana & Regimar Garcia dos Santos & Pedro Henrique Neves da Silva & Hemerson Pistori & Larissa Pereira Ribeiro Teodoro & Nerison Luis Poersch & Gileno Brito de Azevedo & Glauce Ta, 2023. "Machine Learning Methods for Woody Volume Prediction in Eucalyptus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10968-:d:1192966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10968/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10968/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peters, Jan & Baets, Bernard De & Verhoest, Niko E.C. & Samson, Roeland & Degroeve, Sven & Becker, Piet De & Huybrechts, Willy, 2007. "Random forests as a tool for ecohydrological distribution modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 304-318.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yikalo H. Araya & Tarmo K. Remmel & Ajith H. Perera, 2016. "What governs the presence of residual vegetation in boreal wildfires?," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 159-181, April.
    2. Sarah Mittlefehldt & Erin Bunting & Emily Huff & Joseph Welsh & Robert Goodwin, 2021. "New Methods for Assessing Sustainability of Wood-Burning Energy Facilities: Combining Historical and Spatial Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Sachin Kumar & T. Gopi & N. Harikeerthana & Munish Kumar Gupta & Vidit Gaur & Grzegorz M. Krolczyk & ChuanSong Wu, 2023. "Machine learning techniques in additive manufacturing: a state of the art review on design, processes and production control," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 21-55, January.
    4. Seyed Naghibi & Hamid Pourghasemi, 2015. "A Comparative Assessment Between Three Machine Learning Models and Their Performance Comparison by Bivariate and Multivariate Statistical Methods in Groundwater Potential Mapping," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(14), pages 5217-5236, November.
    5. Bemah Ibrahim & Isaac Ahenkorah & Anthony Ewusi, 2022. "Explainable Risk Assessment of Rockbolts’ Failure in Underground Coal Mines Based on Categorical Gradient Boosting and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Vanesa Mateo-Pérez & Marina Corral-Bobadilla & Francisco Ortega-Fernández & Vicente Rodríguez-Montequín, 2021. "Determination of Water Depth in Ports Using Satellite Data Based on Machine Learning Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Saeid SHABANI, 2017. "Modelling and mapping of soil damage caused by harvesting in Caspian forests (Iran) using CART and RF data mining techniques," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(9), pages 425-432.
    8. Jun-Mao Liao & Ming-Jui Chang & Luh-Maan Chang, 2020. "Prediction of Air-Conditioning Energy Consumption in R&D Building Using Multiple Machine Learning Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, April.
    9. Shuang Zhang & Shaobo Liu & Qikang Zhong & Kai Zhu & Hongpeng Fu, 2024. "Assessing Eco-Environmental Effects and Its Impacts Mechanisms in the Mountainous City: Insights from Ecological–Production–Living Spaces Using Machine Learning Models in Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Peters, Jan & Verhoest, Niko E.C. & Samson, Roeland & Van Meirvenne, Marc & Cockx, Liesbet & De Baets, Bernard, 2009. "Uncertainty propagation in vegetation distribution models based on ensemble classifiers," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(6), pages 791-804.
    11. Mehrdad Jeihouni & Ara Toomanian & Ali Mansourian, 2020. "Decision Tree-Based Data Mining and Rule Induction for Identifying High Quality Groundwater Zones to Water Supply Management: a Novel Hybrid Use of Data Mining and GIS," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(1), pages 139-154, January.
    12. Li, Yi & Zou, Changfu & Berecibar, Maitane & Nanini-Maury, Elise & Chan, Jonathan C.-W. & van den Bossche, Peter & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Omar, Noshin, 2018. "Random forest regression for online capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 197-210.
    13. Shuaiwei Shi & Meiyi Hou & Zifan Gu & Ce Jiang & Weiqiang Zhang & Mengyang Hou & Chenxi Li & Zenglei Xi, 2022. "Estimation of Heavy Metal Content in Soil Based on Machine Learning Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Yeeun Shin & Suyeon Kim & Se-Rin Park & Taewoo Yi & Chulgoo Kim & Sang-Woo Lee & Kyungjin An, 2022. "Identifying Key Environmental Factors for Paulownia coreana Habitats: Implementing National On-Site Survey and Machine Learning Algorithms," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Thomas J. Stohlgren & Peter Ma & Sunil Kumar & Monique Rocca & Jeffrey T. Morisette & Catherine S. Jarnevich & Nate Benson, 2010. "Ensemble Habitat Mapping of Invasive Plant Species," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 224-235, February.
    16. Jiacheng Niu & Huaizhi Tang & Qi Liu & Feng Cheng & Leina Zhang & Lingling Sang & Yuanfang Huang & Chongyang Shen & Bingbo Gao & Zibing Niu, 2022. "Determinants of Soil Bacterial Diversity in a Black Soil Region in a Large-Scale Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Musaab I. Magzoub & Raj Kiran & Saeed Salehi & Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein & Mustafa S. Nasser, 2021. "Assessing the Relation between Mud Components and Rheology for Loss Circulation Prevention Using Polymeric Gels: A Machine Learning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Shahin Nozari & Mohammad Reza Pahlavan-Rad & Colby Brungard & Brandon Heung & Luboš Borůvka, 2024. "Digital soil mapping using machine learning-based methods to predict soil organic carbon in two different districts in the Czech Republic," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 19(1), pages 32-49.
    19. repec:caa:jnlswr:v:preprint:id:119-2023-swr is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Marie-Hélène Roy & Denis Larocque, 2012. "Robustness of random forests for regression," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 993-1006, December.
    21. Shangkun Deng & Chenguang Wang & Zhe Fu & Mingyue Wang, 2021. "An Intelligent System for Insider Trading Identification in Chinese Security Market," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 57(2), pages 593-616, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10968-:d:1192966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.