IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p10753-d1189767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Is the Impact of a Dockless Bike-Sharing System on Urban Public Transit Ridership: A View from Travel Distances

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Lang

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Shiwen Zhang

    (China Eastern Technology Application Research and Development Center Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201700, China)

  • Kexin Fang

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Yingying Xing

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Qingwen Xue

    (College of Central Aviation and Flight, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

Abstract

Recently, the rapid development of the bike-sharing system (BSS) has dramatically influenced passengers’ travel modes. However, whether the relationship between the BSS and public transit is competitive or complementary remains unclear. In this paper, a difference-in-differences (DID) model is proposed to figure out the impact of the dockless BSS (DBSS) on bus ridership. The data was collected from Shanghai, China, which includes data from automatic fare collection (AFC) systems, automatic vehicle location (AVL) systems, DBSS transaction data, and point-of-interest (POI) data. The research is based on the route-level, and the results indicate that shared bikes have a substitution impact on bus ridership. Regarding all the travel distance, each shared bike along the route leads to a 0.39 decrease in daily bus ridership on the weekdays, and a 0.17 decrease in daily bus ridership on the weekends, respectively, indicating that dockless shared bikes lead to a stronger decrease in bus ridership on weekends compared to weekdays. Additionally, the substitution effects of shared bikes on bus ridership gradually decays from 0.104 to 0.016 in daily bus ridership on weekends, respectively, with the increase in the travel distance within 0–3 km. This paper reveals that the travel distance of passengers greatly influences the relationship between the DBSS and public transit on the route level.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Lang & Shiwen Zhang & Kexin Fang & Yingying Xing & Qingwen Xue, 2023. "What Is the Impact of a Dockless Bike-Sharing System on Urban Public Transit Ridership: A View from Travel Distances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10753-:d:1189767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10753/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10753/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Minjun & Cho, Gi-Hyoug, 2021. "Analysis on bike-share ridership for origin-destination pairs: Effects of public transit route characteristics and land-use patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Campbell, Kayleigh B. & Brakewood, Candace, 2017. "Sharing riders: How bikesharing impacts bus ridership in New York City," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 264-282.
    3. Xing, Yingying & Wang, Ke & Lu, Jian John, 2020. "Exploring travel patterns and trip purposes of dockless bike-sharing by analyzing massive bike-sharing data in Shanghai, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Fuller, D. & Gauvin, L. & Kestens, Y. & Daniel, M. & Fournier, M. & Morency, P. & Drouin, L., 2013. "Impact evaluation of a public bicycle share program on cycling: A case example of BIXI in Montreal, Quebec," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(3), pages 85-92.
    5. Martin, Elliot W. & Shaheen, Susan A., 2014. "Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: a tale of two U.S. cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 315-324.
    6. Haitao Jin & Fengjun Jin & Jiao’e Wang & Wei Sun & Libo Dong, 2019. "Competition and Cooperation between Shared Bicycles and Public Transit: A Case Study of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Martin, Elliot PhD & Shaheen, Susan PhD, 2014. "Evaluating Public Transit Modal Shift Dynamics In Response to Bikesharing: A Tale of Two U.S. Cities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6x29n876, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radzimski, Adam & Dzięcielski, Michał, 2021. "Exploring the relationship between bike-sharing and public transport in Poznań, Poland," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 189-202.
    2. Lv, Huitao & Li, Haojie & Chen, Yanlu & Feng, Tao, 2023. "An origin-destination level analysis on the competitiveness of bike-sharing to underground using explainable machine learning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    3. Yi Zhu, 2022. "Can bicycle sharing mitigate vehicle emission in Chinese large cities? Estimation based on mode shift analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1627-1648, December.
    4. Dafeng Xu, 2020. "Free Wheel, Free Will! The Effects of Bikeshare Systems on Urban Commuting Patterns in the U.S," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 664-685, June.
    5. Qiu, Waishan & Chang, Hector, 2021. "The interplay between dockless bikeshare and bus for small-size cities in the US: A case study of Ithaca," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Jinyi Zhou & Changyuan Jing & Xiangjun Hong & Tian Wu, 2019. "Winter Sabotage: The Three-Way Interactive Effect of Gender, Age, and Season on Public Bikesharing Usage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Todd, James & O'Brien, Oliver & Cheshire, James, 2021. "A global comparison of bicycle sharing systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Hu, Songhua & Chen, Mingyang & Jiang, Yuan & Sun, Wei & Xiong, Chenfeng, 2022. "Examining factors associated with bike-and-ride (BnR) activities around metro stations in large-scale dockless bikesharing systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    9. Cheng, Long & Wang, Kailai & De Vos, Jonas & Huang, Jie & Witlox, Frank, 2022. "Exploring non-linear built environment effects on the integration of free-floating bike-share and urban rail transport: A quantile regression approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 175-187.
    10. Böcker, Lars & Anderson, Ellinor & Uteng, Tanu Priya & Throndsen, Torstein, 2020. "Bike sharing use in conjunction to public transport: Exploring spatiotemporal, age and gender dimensions in Oslo, Norway," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 389-401.
    11. Xiaofeng Li & Yao-Jan Wu & Alireza Khani, 2022. "Investigating a small-sized bike-sharing system’s impact on transit usage: a synthetic control analysis in Tucson, Arizona," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 441-458, June.
    12. Tang, Jinjun & Gao, Fan & Han, Chunyang & Cen, Xuekai & Li, Zhitao, 2021. "Uncovering the spatially heterogeneous effects of shared mobility on public transit and taxi," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Wang, Ruoxuan & Wu, Jianping & Qi, Geqi, 2022. "Exploring regional sustainable commuting patterns based on dockless bike-sharing data and POI data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    14. Kim, Kyoungok, 2023. "Investigation of modal integration of bike-sharing and public transit in Seoul for the holders of 365-day passes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    15. Kim, Minjun & Cho, Gi-Hyoug, 2021. "Analysis on bike-share ridership for origin-destination pairs: Effects of public transit route characteristics and land-use patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    16. Yuanyuan Zhang & Yuming Zhang, 2018. "Associations between Public Transit Usage and Bikesharing Behaviors in The United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Link, Christoph & Strasser, Christoph & Hinterreiter, Michael, 2020. "Free-floating bikesharing in Vienna – A user behaviour analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 168-182.
    18. Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu & Chua, Kelman & Yu, Honghai & Zhao, Jinhua, 2021. "E-scooter sharing to serve short-distance transit trips: A Singapore case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 177-196.
    19. Hamilton, Timothy L. & Wichman, Casey J., 2018. "Bicycle infrastructure and traffic congestion: Evidence from DC's Capital Bikeshare," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 72-93.
    20. Xinwei Ma & Shuai Zhang & Yuchuan Jin & Minqing Zhu & Yufei Yuan, 2021. "Identification of Metro-Bikeshare Transfer Trip Chains by Matching Docked Bikeshare and Metro Smartcards," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10753-:d:1189767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.