IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10315-d1183028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment and Ranking of the Behavioural Leadership Model in the Process of Implementing Reforms in Public Sector of the Republic of Serbia Using the PIPRECIA Method

Author

Listed:
  • Tatjana Janovac

    (Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance, University Business Academy in Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Goran Djokovic

    (Management and Marketing Department, Modern Business School, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Aleksandra Pusara

    (Faculty of Management, University Union-Nikola Tesla, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Viktorija Misic

    (Gen Digital, 14000 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Ksenija Milankovic

    (City Municipality of Rakovica, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Aleksandra Pavicevic

    (Faculty of Information Technology and Engineering, University Union-Nikola Tesla, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Adrijana Vukovic

    (Faculty of Law, Security and Management “Constantine the Great”, University Union-Nikola Tesla, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Sasa Virijevic Jovanovic

    (Management and Marketing Department, Modern Business School, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

The establishment of sustainable leadership is essential for the process of implementing reforms in public sector. Sustainable leadership implies effective leadership capable of responding to changes that come from both the internal and external environment. To achieve this, it is necessary to apply multi-criteria decision-making methods. In this paper, the new multi-criteria decision-making method PIPRECIA was used to assess the criteria and five models of leader behaviour that are significant for the process of implementing reforms in the public sector of the Republic of Serbia. In essence, the paper aims to emphasise the simplicity of the practical application of the PIPRECIA method, which was discussed through a numerical illustration on the basis of which the conclusions were drawn. The research results indicate that the criterion Individual competence of the leader (C 4 -0.24) has the greatest weight. By ranking the alternatives, it was estimated that the Charismatic model of behaviour (A 5 -0.219) is the leader’s behaviour model that can have the greatest importance in the process of implementing public sector reforms. The Directive model of behaviour (A 3 -0.197) was derived as the second most important, which is understandable if we consider the fact that this model of leader’s behaviour traditionally dominates the work of the public sector. Furthermore, Participatory behaviour model (A 1 -0.193), Supportive behaviour model (A 2 -0.193) and Transformational behaviour model (A 4 -0.193) have equal rank, which means that they have the same importance for the decision-maker. The findings provide significant information to leaders of public organisations on how to implement reforms and manage human resources more effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatjana Janovac & Goran Djokovic & Aleksandra Pusara & Viktorija Misic & Ksenija Milankovic & Aleksandra Pavicevic & Adrijana Vukovic & Sasa Virijevic Jovanovic, 2023. "Assessment and Ranking of the Behavioural Leadership Model in the Process of Implementing Reforms in Public Sector of the Republic of Serbia Using the PIPRECIA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10315-:d:1183028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Osama Khassawneh & Hamzah Elrehail, 2022. "The Effect of Participative Leadership Style on Employees’ Performance: The Contingent Role of Institutional Theory," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Louise Metcalf & Sue Benn, 2013. "Leadership for Sustainability: An Evolution of Leadership Ability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 369-384, February.
    3. Luu Trong Tuan, 2017. "Reform in public organizations: the roles of ambidextrous leadership and moderating mechanisms," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 518-541, April.
    4. Kim, Kyoung Yong & Atwater, Leanne & Jolly, Phillip & Ugwuanyi, Ijeoma & Baik, Kibok & Yu, Jia, 2021. "Supportive leadership and job performance: Contributions of supportive climate, team-member exchange (TMX), and group-mean TMX," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 661-674.
    5. Fabian Hattke & Rick Vogel & Judith Znanewitz, 2018. "Satisfied with red tape? Leadership, civic duty, and career intention in the military," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 563-586, April.
    6. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 2020. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 281-298, April.
    7. Kowo Solomon Akpoviroro & Sabitu Olalekan Owotutu & Akinbola Amos Olufemi, 2018. "Effect Of Participative Leadership Style On Employee?S Productivity," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 39(1), pages 5-13.
    8. Louis W. Fry & Eleftheria Egel, 2021. "Global Leadership for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Kowo Solomon Akpoviroro & Bola Kadiri & Sabitu Olalekan Owotutu, 2018. "Effect of Participative Leadership Style on Employee’s Productivity," The International Journal of Economic Behavior - IJEB, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 8(1), pages 47-60.
    10. Ebru Ulucan & Nihan Yavuz Aksakal, 2022. "Leadership Selection with the Fuzzy Topsis Method in the Hospitality Sector in Sultanahmet Region," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jane Boeske & Peter A. Murray, 2022. "The Intellectual Domains of Sustainability Leadership in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Dr. Nuwatuhaire Benard & Dr. Rwabutogo Zogeye Marcel & Janan Mubehamwe & Dr. Phanual Murenzi, 2023. "Assessing the Relationship between Female Head Teachers’ Supportive Leadership Behaviours and Organizational Effectiveness of Secondary Schools in Rwanda, Nyagatare District," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(11), pages 1292-1306, November.
    3. Kasimu Ssenyange, 2023. "The Impact of Leadership Styles on Government Construction Project Success: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 13(3), pages 50-75.
    4. Aymen Sajjad & Gabriel Eweje & Muhammad Mustafa Raziq, 2024. "Sustainability leadership: An integrative review and conceptual synthesis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2849-2867, May.
    5. Yan Wang & Tachia Chin & Francesco Caputo & Hanfeng Liu, 2022. "How Supportive Leadership Promotes Employee Innovation under Uncertainty: Evidence from Chinese E-Commerce Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Irene Chu & Mai Chi Vu, 2022. "The Nature of the Self, Self-regulation and Moral Action: Implications from the Confucian Relational Self and Buddhist Non-self," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 245-262, September.
    7. Matata Ponyo Mapon & Jean-Paul K. Tsasa, 2021. "Leadership and Institutional Reforms," Papers 2101.08702, arXiv.org.
    8. Nicos A. Scordis & Yoshihiko Suzawa & Astrid Zwick & Lucia Ruckner, 2014. "Principles for Sustainable Insurance: Risk Management and Value," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 17(2), pages 265-276, September.
    9. Louis W. Fry & Mai Chi Vu, 2024. "Leading Without a Self: Implications of Buddhist Practices for Pseudo-spiritual Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 41-57, February.
    10. Marić, Josip & Opazo-Basáez, Marco & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Hong, Paul & Jagani, Sandeep & Kim, Jinhwan & Youn, Sun Hee, 2019. "Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 71-81.
    12. Alice Klettner & Thomas Clarke & Martijn Boersma, 2014. "The Governance of Corporate Sustainability: Empirical Insights into the Development, Leadership and Implementation of Responsible Business Strategy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 145-165, June.
    13. Anna Lewandowska & Zia Ullah & Fatima Saleh AlDhaen & Esra AlDhaen & Alina Yakymchuk, 2023. "Enhancing Organizational Social Sustainability: Exploring the Effect of Sustainable Leadership and the Moderating Role of Micro-Level CSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Turgut Karakose & Ibrahim Kocabas & Ramazan Yirci & Stamatios Papadakis & Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir & Murat Demirkol, 2022. "The Development and Evolution of Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Mapping Approach-Based Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    15. Olivier Boiral & Charles Baron & Olen Gunnlaugson, 2014. "Environmental Leadership and Consciousness Development: A Case Study Among Canadian SMEs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 363-383, September.
    16. Emanuele Gabriel Margherita & Alessio Maria Braccini, 2021. "Exploring Sustainable Value Creation of Industry 4.0 Technologies Within the Socio-technical Perspective: A Meta-review," Post-Print hal-03410741, HAL.
    17. Yoon Jung Jang, 2024. "Charting a Course for Sustainable Hospitality by Exploring Leadership Theories and Their Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Wai Peng Wong & Muhammad Fahad Anwar & Keng Lin Soh, 2024. "Transportation 4.0 in supply chain management: State-of-the-art and future directions towards 5.0 in the transportation sector," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 683-710, June.
    19. Ibrahim Yitmen & Amjad Almusaed & Sepehr Alizadehsalehi, 2023. "Investigating the Causal Relationships among Enablers of the Construction 5.0 Paradigm: Integration of Operator 5.0 and Society 5.0 with Human-Centricity, Sustainability, and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, June.
    20. Karin Tollin & Lars Bech Christensen, 2019. "Sustainability Marketing Commitment: Empirical Insights About Its Drivers at the Corporate and Functional Level of Marketing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 1165-1185, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10315-:d:1183028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.