IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10222-d1181187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioleaching Techniques for Sustainable Recovery of Metals from Solid Matrices

Author

Listed:
  • Leidy Rendón-Castrillón

    (Centro de Estudios y de Investigación en Biotecnología (CIBIOT), Chemical Engineering Faculty, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

  • Margarita Ramírez-Carmona

    (Centro de Estudios y de Investigación en Biotecnología (CIBIOT), Chemical Engineering Faculty, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

  • Carlos Ocampo-López

    (Centro de Estudios y de Investigación en Biotecnología (CIBIOT), Chemical Engineering Faculty, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

  • Luis Gómez-Arroyave

    (Bioexplora S.A.S., Medellín 050031, Colombia)

Abstract

This review paper explores the potential of bioleaching as a sustainable alternative for recovering metals from solid matrices. With over 12 billion tons of solid waste annually worldwide, bioleaching provides a promising opportunity to extract metals from solid waste, avoiding harmful chemical processes. It explains bacterial and fungal bioleaching techniques that extract copper, gold, zinc, and other metals from solid matrices. Fungal bioleaching effectively extracts a wide range of valuable metals, including nickel, vanadium, aluminium, molybdenum, cobalt, iron, manganese, silver, platinum, and palladium. The review highlights different solid matrices with metal contents that have the potential to be recovered by bioleaching, presenting promising bioprocess alternatives to current industrially available technologies for metal recovery. The optimal conditions for bioleaching, including pH, temperature, agitation–aeration, and pulp density are also discussed. The review shows that bioleaching has the potential to play a crucial role in the transition to a more sustainable and circular economy by providing an efficient, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly method for metal recovery from solid matrices.

Suggested Citation

  • Leidy Rendón-Castrillón & Margarita Ramírez-Carmona & Carlos Ocampo-López & Luis Gómez-Arroyave, 2023. "Bioleaching Techniques for Sustainable Recovery of Metals from Solid Matrices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10222-:d:1181187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10222/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10222/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jolanta Latosińska & Przemysław Czapik, 2020. "The Ecological Risk Assessment and the Chemical Speciation of Heavy Metals in Ash after the Incineration of Municipal Sewage Sludge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Grace Inman & Ikenna C. Nlebedim & Denis Prodius, 2022. "Application of Ionic Liquids for the Recycling and Recovery of Technologically Critical and Valuable Metals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Vincent Moreau & Piero Carlo Dos Reis & François Vuille, 2019. "Enough Metals? Resource Constraints to Supply a Fully Renewable Energy System," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Timo Kuusiola & Maaria Wierink & Kari Heiskanen, 2012. "Comparison of Collection Schemes of Municipal Solid Waste Metallic Fraction: The Impacts on Global Warming Potential for the Case of the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(10), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Vladimír Čech & Bohuslava Gregorová & Juliana Krokusová & Vladislava Košová & Pavel Hronček & Mário Molokáč & Jana Hlaváčová, 2020. "Environmentally Degraded Mining Areas of Eastern Slovakia As a Potential Object of Geotourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Volker Steinbach & Friedrich-W. Wellmer, 2010. "Consumption and Use of Non-Renewable Mineral and Energy Raw Materials from an Economic Geology Point of View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(5), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Mateusz Sydow & Łukasz Chrzanowski & Alexandra Leclerc & Alexis Laurent & Mikołaj Owsianiak, 2018. "Terrestrial Ecotoxic Impacts Stemming from Emissions of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn from Manure: A Spatially Differentiated Assessment in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Giorgio Provolo & Giulia Manuli & Alberto Finzi & Giorgio Lucchini & Elisabetta Riva & Gian Attilio Sacchi, 2018. "Effect of Pig and Cattle Slurry Application on Heavy Metal Composition of Maize Grown on Different Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Ahmed A. Ismaiel & Jutta Papenbrock, 2015. "Mycotoxins: Producing Fungi and Mechanisms of Phytotoxicity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-46, July.
    10. Thi Minh Tran & Hyeop-Jo Han & Ju-In Ko & Jong-Un Lee, 2020. "Effect of Indigenous Microbial Consortium on Bioleaching of Arsenic from Contaminated Soil by Shewanella putrefaciens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianqiang Wu & Chenyan Sha & Min Wang & Chunmei Ye & Peng Li & Shenfa Huang, 2021. "Effect of Organic Fertilizer on Soil Bacteria in Maize Fields," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Hua Zhang & Zong-Guo Wen, 2014. "Residents’ Household Solid Waste (HSW) Source Separation Activity: A Case Study of Suzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Courage Mlambo, 2022. "Non-Renewable Resources and Sustainable Resource Extraction: An Empirical Test of the Hotelling Rule’s Significance to Gold Extraction in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Le Boulzec, Hugo & Delannoy, Louis & Andrieu, Baptiste & Verzier, François & Vidal, Olivier & Mathy, Sandrine, 2022. "Dynamic modeling of global fossil fuel infrastructure and materials needs: Overcoming a lack of available data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    5. Söderholm, Patrik, 2023. "How environmental permitting uncertainty in large-scale mining could influence subcontractors: The underlying chicken-and-egg problem," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Song, Huiling & Wang, Chang & Sun, Kun & Geng, Hongjun & Zuo, Lyushui, 2023. "Material efficiency strategies across the industrial chain to secure indium availability for global carbon neutrality," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    7. Frenzel, Max & Tolosana-Delgado, Raimon & Gutzmer, Jens, 2015. "Assessing the supply potential of high-tech metals – A general method," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P2), pages 45-58.
    8. Katarzyna Klejnowska & Mateusz Sydow & Rafał Michalski & Magdalena Bogacka, 2022. "Life Cycle Impacts of Recycling of Black Mass Obtained from End-of-Life Zn-C and Alkaline Batteries Using Waelz Kiln," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Agnieszka Klimek-Kopyra & Joanna Dłużniewska & Anna Ślizowska & Jan Wincenty Dobrowolski, 2020. "Impact of Coherent Laser Irradiation on Germination and Mycoflora of Soybean Seeds—Innovative and Prospective Seed Quality Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Joaquin Vespignani & Russell Smyth, 2024. "Artificial intelligence investments reduce risks to critical mineral supply," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Olesya A. Buryakovskaya & Anna I. Kurbatova & Mikhail S. Vlaskin & George E. Valyano & Anatoly V. Grigorenko & Grayr N. Ambaryan & Aleksandr O. Dudoladov, 2022. "Waste to Hydrogen: Elaboration of Hydroreactive Materials from Magnesium-Aluminum Scrap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-34, April.
    12. Teixeira, Bernardo & Brito, Miguel Centeno & Mateus, António, 2024. "Raw materials for the Portuguese decarbonization roadmap: The case of solar photovoltaics and wind energy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Ahmed A. Ismaiel & Jutta Papenbrock, 2023. "Thioredoxin Is a New Target for the Phytotoxicity of Small Lactone Mycotoxins, Patulin and Penicillic Acid on Maize Seedlings," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Stuermer, Martin & Schwerhoff, Gregor, 2013. "Technological change in resource extraction and endogenous growth," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 12/2013, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    15. Alberto Finzi & Gabriele Mattachini & Daniela Lovarelli & Elisabetta Riva & Giorgio Provolo, 2020. "Technical, Economic, and Environmental Assessment of a Collective Integrated Treatment System for Energy Recovery and Nutrient Removal from Livestock Manure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Hanna Dorna & Agnieszka Rosińska & Dorota Szopińska, 2023. "The Impact of Acetic Acid Treatments on Stored Onion ( Allium cepa L.) Seeds’ Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Chen, Jinyu & Luo, Qian & Sun, Xin & Zhang, Zitao & Dong, Xuesong, 2023. "The impact of renewable energy consumption on lithium trade patterns: An industrial chain perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    18. Ted Trainer, 2022. "Can Australia Run on Renewable Energy: Unsettled Issues and Implications," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Aramendia, Emmanuel & Brockway, Paul E. & Taylor, Peter G. & Norman, Jonathan B., 2024. "Exploring the effects of mineral depletion on renewable energy technologies net energy returns," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    20. Ahmed A. Ismaiel & Jutta Papenbrock, 2017. "Effect of Patulin from Penicillium vulpinum on the Activity of Glutathione-S-Transferase and Selected Antioxidative Enzymes in Maize," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10222-:d:1181187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.