IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9722-d1173683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ports in a Storm: Port-City Environmental Challenges and Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Toby Roberts

    (Infrastructure Group, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK)

  • Ian Williams

    (Infrastructure Group, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK)

  • John Preston

    (Transportation Group, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK)

  • Nick Clarke

    (Ramboll UK Ltd., Southampton SO15 2AQ, UK)

  • Melinda Odum

    (Ramboll UK Ltd., Southampton SO15 2AQ, UK)

  • Stefanie O’Gorman

    (Ramboll UK Ltd., Edinburgh EH2 3BU, UK)

Abstract

The potential detrimental environmental impact of ports is vast, and port-cities bear the brunt of this. It is essential that future port-city development proceeds in such a way as to reduce the environmental impact that port activity creates for the city and local area. This global study of port authorities in 26 countries and city authorities in 13 countries investigated the current views on pollution, levels of adoption of mitigation measures, future plans, levels of interest in adoption and barriers to key measures for reducing a port’s environmental impact. This reveals consensus on key areas between port and city authorities for the first time. Water pollution was found to be the number one environmental concern of port authorities globally. Air, noise and waste were also found to be important forms of pollution in ports, both from the perspective of port and city authorities and in terms of complaints received. Ports largely have facilities for recycling, although the majority have no set recycling plans, with 62% of ports having none in place. Targets should be encouraged, as well as circular economy approaches, if this is to be addressed. Renewable energy, electric port equipment, building efficiency improvements, electric port and harbour vessels and shore-to-ship power all have high levels of support from port and city authorities, although costs provide the largest barriers to implementation. Greater cooperation between port-city stakeholders is necessary to overcome the large financial barriers that appear to be preventing ports from pursuing the environmental improvements they are interested in.

Suggested Citation

  • Toby Roberts & Ian Williams & John Preston & Nick Clarke & Melinda Odum & Stefanie O’Gorman, 2023. "Ports in a Storm: Port-City Environmental Challenges and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9722-:d:1173683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9722/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9722/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winkel, R. & Weddige, U. & Johnsen, D. & Hoen, V. & Papaefthimiou, S., 2016. "Shore Side Electricity in Europe: Potential and environmental benefits," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 584-593.
    2. Thalis Zis & Robin Jacob North & Panagiotis Angeloudis & Washington Yotto Ochieng & Michael Geoffrey Harrison Bell, 2014. "Evaluation of cold ironing and speed reduction policies to reduce ship emissions near and at ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 16(4), pages 371-398, December.
    3. Meifeng Luo & Tsz Leung Yip, 2013. "Ports and the environment," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 401-403, September.
    4. Chang, Ching-Chin & Chang, Chia-Hong, 2013. "Energy conservation for international dry bulk carriers via vessel speed reduction," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 710-715.
    5. David H. Fletcher & Joanne K. Garrett & Amy Thomas & Alice Fitch & Phil Cryle & Simon Shilton & Laurence Jones, 2022. "Location, Location, Location: Modelling of Noise Mitigation by Urban Woodland Shows the Benefit of Targeted Tree Planting in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Toby Roberts & Ian Williams & John Preston & Nick Clarke & Melinda Odum & Stefanie O’Gorman, 2021. "Love Thy Neighbour: Social Benefits and Port-City Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Toby Roberts & Ian Williams & John Preston & Nick Clarke & Melinda Odum & Stefanie O'Gorman, 2021. "A Virtuous Circle? Increasing Local Benefits from Ports by Adopting Circular Economy Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Davide Borelli & Francesco Devia & Corrado Schenone & Federico Silenzi & Luca A. Tagliafico, 2021. "Dynamic Modelling of LNG Powered Combined Energy Systems in Port Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Burel, Fabio & Taccani, Rodolfo & Zuliani, Nicola, 2013. "Improving sustainability of maritime transport through utilization of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) for propulsion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 412-420.
    10. Genevieve Giuliano & Thomas O’Brien, 2008. "Extended gate operations at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach: a preliminary assessment," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 215-235, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Jon Williamsson & Nicole Costa & Vendela Santén & Sara Rogerson, 2022. "Barriers and Drivers to the Implementation of Onshore Power Supply—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Anastasia Christodoulou & Kevin Cullinane, 0. "Potential for, and drivers of, private voluntary initiatives for the decarbonisation of short sea shipping: evidence from a Swedish ferry line," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    4. Anastasia Christodoulou & Kevin Cullinane, 2021. "Potential for, and drivers of, private voluntary initiatives for the decarbonisation of short sea shipping: evidence from a Swedish ferry line," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 632-654, December.
    5. Dai, Lei & Hu, Hao & Wang, Zhaojing, 2020. "Is Shore Side Electricity greener? An environmental analysis and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    6. Yun Peng & Xiangda Li & Wenyuan Wang & Ke Liu & Xiao Bing & Xiangqun Song, 2018. "A Method for Determining the Required Power Capacity of an On-Shore Power System Considering Uncertainties of Arriving Ships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Eric Tamatey Lawer & Johannes Herbeck & Michael Flitner, 2019. "Selective Adoption: How Port Authorities in Europe and West Africa Engage with the Globalizing ‘Green Port’ Idea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Roko Glavinović & Maja Krčum & Luka Vukić & Ivan Karin, 2023. "Cold Ironing Implementation Overview in European Ports—Case Study—Croatian Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Wang, Tingsong & Cheng, Peiyue & Zhen, Lu, 2023. "Green development of the maritime industry: Overview, perspectives, and future research opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Yang He & Yun Zhu, 2023. "Comprehensive Benefit Analysis of Port Shore Power Based on Carbon Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Dan Zhuge & Shuaian Wang & Lu Zhen & Gilbert Laporte, 2020. "Schedule design for liner services under vessel speed reduction incentive programs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(1), pages 45-62, February.
    12. Anastasia Christodoulou & Kevin Cullinane, 2019. "Identifying the Main Opportunities and Challenges from the Implementation of a Port Energy Management System: A SWOT/PESTLE Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Stolz, B. & Held, M. & Georges, G. & Boulouchos, K., 2021. "The CO2 reduction potential of shore-side electricity in Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    14. Dan Zhuge & Shuaian Wang & Lu Zhen & Gilbert Laporte, 2021. "Subsidy design in a vessel speed reduction incentive program under government policies," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(3), pages 344-358, April.
    15. Luo, Xiaobo & Wang, Meihong, 2017. "Study of solvent-based carbon capture for cargo ships through process modelling and simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 402-413.
    16. Jang, Hayoung & Jeong, Byongug & Zhou, Peilin & Ha, Seungman & Nam, Dong, 2021. "Demystifying the lifecycle environmental benefits and harms of LNG as marine fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    17. Thalis P. V. Zis & Harilaos N. Psaraftis, 2022. "Impacts of short-term measures to decarbonize maritime transport on perishable cargoes," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 602-629, September.
    18. Zhu, Yu & Li, Jiamei & Ge, Minghui & Gu, Hai & Wang, Shixue, 2023. "Numerical and experimental study of a non-frosting thermoelectric generation device for low temperature waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    19. Peter Andersson & Pernilla Ivehammar, 2017. "Dynamic route planning in the Baltic Sea Region – A cost-benefit analysis based on AIS data," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(4), pages 631-649, December.
    20. Nanxi Wang & Daofang Chang & Xiaowei Shi & Jun Yuan & Yinping Gao, 2019. "Analysis and Design of Typical Automated Container Terminals Layout Considering Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-40, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9722-:d:1173683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.