IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8855-d1160355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of Spatial–Temporal Differences and Measurement of the Level of Forestry Industry Integration in China

Author

Listed:
  • Mingming Jin

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35, Tsinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ni Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35, Tsinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Haisheng Sun

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35, Tsinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Fangping Cao

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35, Tsinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The integration of the forestry industry can effectively resolve the conflict between ecological protection and socioeconomic development while bringing new vitality and growth to traditional forestry. In this study, the level of forestry industry integration in 31 provinces in China from 2005 to 2019 was measured using the Herfindahl index method. With ArcGIS and exploratory spatial data analysis methods, the spatial-temporal distribution characteristics, dynamic change trends, spatial correlation characteristics, and existing problems in China’s forestry industry integration development were analyzed. The results showed that the total output value of forestry integrated products and the output value of each product segment increased, but the proportion of product development was imbalanced, and it was concentrated in the understory planting and collection industry and wood processing and manufacturing industry, leaving substantial room for improvement and integration. The value of the forestry industry integration index also increased overall, but the level of integration was low or moderate. In terms of time, the integration index of most provinces trended upward but failed to break through 0.73, leaving a significant gap between it and deep integration. Spatially, the level of integration of the forestry industry varied across the northeast, central, west, and east, with the central and northeast showing a higher integration degree than the east and west. China’s forestry industry integration showed a significant positive spatial correlation, indicating that spatial factors had become an important factor affecting the development of the forestry industry in various regions. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the relevant mechanisms of cross-border cooperation and benefit sharing. Lastly, we identified problems with the integration development of the forestry industry, including insufficient and imbalanced integration, unreasonable structural layout of integration development, and insufficient driving capacity for integration. As a result, there were phased and regional differences in the evolution of forestry industry integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingming Jin & Ni Chen & Haisheng Sun & Fangping Cao, 2023. "Characteristics of Spatial–Temporal Differences and Measurement of the Level of Forestry Industry Integration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8855-:d:1160355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8855/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8855/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lemola, Tarmo, 2002. "Convergence of national science and technology policies: the case of Finland," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8-9), pages 1481-1490, December.
    2. Rosenberg, Nathan, 1963. "Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 414-443, December.
    3. Gambardella, Alfonso & Torrisi, Salvatore, 1998. "Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 445-463, September.
    4. Shuren Wang & Qingyu Chai & Xu Sun & Qiwen Zhang & Hongxian Yu, 2021. "Construction and application of evaluation system for integrated development of agricultural industry in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7469-7479, May.
    5. Abebe Birara Dessie & Tigabu Dagnew Koye & Abebe Dagnew Koye & Asmamaw Alemu Abitew, 2019. "Analysis of red pepper marketing: evidence from northwest Ethiopia," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Daniel A. Griffith, 2003. "Spatial Autocorrelation and Spatial Filtering," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-540-24806-4, december.
    7. Lin Li & Tong Liu & Subo Xu & Zhiwei Tian, 2021. "Evaluation on sustainable development of forest tourism in Heilongjiang Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13382-13402, September.
    8. Rui Qu & Zaewoong Rhee & Seung-Jong Bae & Sang-Hyun Lee, 2022. "Analysis of Industrial Diversification Level of Economic Development in Rural Areas Using Herfindahl Index and Two-Step Clustering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Shuai Wang & Cunyi Yang & Zhenghui Li, 2022. "Green Total Factor Productivity Growth: Policy-Guided or Market-Driven?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-19, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seongkyoon Jeong & Jong-Chan Kim & Jae Young Choi, 2015. "Technology convergence: What developmental stage are we in?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(3), pages 841-871, September.
    2. Dejing Kong & Jianzhong Yang & Lingfeng Li, 2020. "Early identification of technological convergence in numerical control machine tool: a deep learning approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 1983-2009, December.
    3. Sick, Nathalie & Preschitschek, Nina & Leker, Jens & Bröring, Stefanie, 2019. "A new framework to assess industry convergence in high technology environments," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 84, pages 48-58.
    4. Wang, Q. & von Tunzelmann, N., 2000. "Complexity and the functions of the firm: breadth and depth," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7-8), pages 805-818, August.
    5. Park, Mingyu & Geum, Youngjung, 2022. "Two-stage technology opportunity discovery for firm-level decision making: GCN-based link-prediction approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    6. Wenjing Zhu & Bohong Ma & Lele Kang, 2022. "Technology convergence among various technical fields: improvement of entropy estimation in patent analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7731-7750, December.
    7. Piscitello, Lucia, 2000. "Relatedness and coherence in technological and product diversification of the world's largest firms," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 295-315, September.
    8. Pan, Maomao & Bai, Min & Ren, Xiaoxiao, 2022. "Does internet convergence improve manufacturing enterprises’ competitive advantage? Empirical research based on the mediation effect model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Zhou, Yuan & Dong, Fang & Kong, Dejing & Liu, Yufei, 2019. "Unfolding the convergence process of scientific knowledge for the early identification of emerging technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 205-220.
    10. Chunbo Zhou & Marios Sotiriadis, 2021. "Exploring and Evaluating the Impact of ICTs on Culture and Tourism Industries’ Convergence: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Sick, Nathalie & Bröring, Stefanie, 2022. "Exploring the research landscape of convergence from a TIM perspective: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Lee, Hyunmin, 2023. "Converging technology to improve firm innovation competencies and business performance: Evidence from smart manufacturing technologies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    13. Youngjung Geum & Yongtae Park & Sungjoo Lee, 2013. "The Convergence of Manufacturing and Service Technologies: A Patent Analysis Approach," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 5(2), pages 99-107.
    14. Heo, Pil Sun & Lee, Duk Hee, 2019. "Evolution patterns and network structural characteristics of industry convergence," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 405-426.
    15. Jungpyo Lee & So Young Sohn, 2021. "Recommendation system for technology convergence opportunities based on self-supervised representation learning," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 1-25, January.
    16. Kim, Juram & Kim, Seungho & Lee, Changyong, 2019. "Anticipating technological convergence: Link prediction using Wikipedia hyperlinks," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 25-34.
    17. Thomas Bolli & Martin Woerter, 2013. "Technological Diversification and Innovation Performance," KOF Working papers 13-336, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    18. D'Este, Pablo, 2005. "How do firms' knowledge bases affect intra-industry heterogeneity?: An analysis of the Spanish pharmaceutical industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 33-45, February.
    19. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    20. Lorenz, Steffi, 2015. "Diversität und Verbundenheit der unternehmerischen Wissensbasis: Ein neuartiger Messansatz mit Indikatoren aus Innovationsprojekten," Discussion Papers on Strategy and Innovation 15-01, Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Technology and Innovation Management (TIM).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8855-:d:1160355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.