IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8464-d1153749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Urban Ecological Environment Quality Based on Improved RSEI and Driving Factors Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Na Chen

    (College Surveying & Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China)

  • Gang Cheng

    (College Surveying & Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China)

  • Jie Yang

    (College Surveying & Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China)

  • Huan Ding

    (College Surveying & Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China)

  • Shi He

    (College Surveying & Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China)

Abstract

Monitoring the quality of the urban ecological environment has become one of the important elements of promoting a sustainable urban development. The remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) provides a new research direction in urban ecological environment monitoring, combined with remote sensing. However, by using the principal component analysis method in RSEI, the calculation results are complicated and the workload is huge. To effectively assess the urban ecological environment, an improved remote sensing ecological index (IRSEI) was created to improve the ease of data use by using the entropy weighting method with spatiotemporal characteristics and seasonal variations. Furthermore, a geographically weighted regression model was used to quantify the impact of human activities on the urban ecological environment quality. The results showed that the IRSEI could provide a new method for monitoring the urban ecological environment quality, which makes the work easier while ensuring the validity of the results. It was concluded that (1) seasonal differences in the ecological quality of the study area were evident in the IRSEI model and the overall ecological environment quality of Jining City had been on an upward trend in the past 20 years; (2) the ecological quality in the study area was unevenly distributed spatially, with the southwestern part being better than the northeastern part, and the ecological grade being predominantly between moderate and good; and (3) the spatial aggregation effect of the IRSEI was increasing with time. The geographically weighted regression (GWR) revealed the influence of human activities on the ecological environment quality, among which economic level was positively related to ecological improvement, but the population density and night light index were negatively related to improvements in the ecological environment; road network density only showed a negative correlation in 2020. As Jining urbanizes, attention should be paid to protecting the built environment and population distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Na Chen & Gang Cheng & Jie Yang & Huan Ding & Shi He, 2023. "Evaluation of Urban Ecological Environment Quality Based on Improved RSEI and Driving Factors Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8464-:d:1153749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8464/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8464/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pengwen Gao & Alimujiang Kasimu & Yongyu Zhao & Bing Lin & Jinpeng Chai & Tuersunayi Ruzi & Hemiao Zhao, 2020. "Evaluation of the Temporal and Spatial Changes of Ecological Quality in the Hami Oasis Based on RSEI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Yao, ZHOU & Jiang, CHANG & Shan-shan, FENG, 2022. "Effects of urban growth boundaries on urban spatial structural and ecological functional optimization in the Jining Metropolitan Area, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Weilong Yang & Yi Zhou & Chaozhu Li, 2023. "Assessment of Ecological Environment Quality in Rare Earth Mining Areas Based on Improved RSEI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenhui Guo & Ranghui Wang, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecological Environment Quality and Driving Factors in Jiaodong Peninsula, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Chaofan Ma & Lingzhi Wang & Yangfan Chen & Junjie Wu & Anqi Liang & Xinyao Li & Chengge Jiang & Hichem Omrani, 2024. "Evolution and Drivers of Production Patterns of Major Crops in Jilin Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Zongmei Li & Wang Man & Jiahui Peng & Yang Wang & Qin Nie & Fengqin Sun & Yutong Huang, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Variation in Ecological Environmental Quality and Its Response to Different Factors in the Xia-Zhang-Quan Urban Agglomeration over the Past 30 Years," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Tianxiang Long & Zhuhui Bai & Bohong Zheng, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Forces of Ecological Environment Quality in Coastal Cities: A Remote Sensing and Land Use Perspective in Changle District, Fuzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Jorge Quijada-Alarcón & Roberto Rodríguez-Rodríguez & Nicoletta González-Cancelas & Gabriel Bethancourt-Lasso, 2023. "Spatial Analysis of Territorial Connectivity and Accessibility in the Province of Coclé in Panama," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Ming Chang & Shuying Meng & Zifan Zhang & Ruiguo Wang & Chao Yin & Yuxia Zhao & Yi Zhou, 2023. "Analysis of Eco-Environmental Quality and Driving Forces in Opencast Coal Mining Area Based on GWANN Model: A Case Study in Shengli Coalfield, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Xiang Zhu & Siyu Wei & Yijin Wu, 2024. "Eco-Environmental Assessment and Trend Analysis of the Yangtze River Middle Reaches Megalopolis Based on a Modified Remote Sensing Ecological Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Hui Li & Haitao Jing & Geding Yan & Huanchao Guo & Wenfei Luan, 2023. "Long-Term Ecological Environment Quality Evaluation and Its Driving Mechanism in Luoyang City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Shuang Zhang & Shaobo Liu & Qikang Zhong & Kai Zhu & Hongpeng Fu, 2024. "Assessing Eco-Environmental Effects and Its Impacts Mechanisms in the Mountainous City: Insights from Ecological–Production–Living Spaces Using Machine Learning Models in Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Ming Shi & Fei Lin & Xia Jing & Bingyu Li & Yang Shi & Yimin Hu, 2023. "Ecological Environment Quality Assessment of Arid Areas Based on Improved Remote Sensing Ecological Index—A Case Study of the Loess Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qifei Zhang & Congjian Sun & Yaning Chen & Wei Chen & Yanyun Xiang & Jiao Li & Yuting Liu, 2022. "Recent Oasis Dynamics and Ecological Security in the Tarim River Basin, Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Chan Lu & Lei Shi & Lihua Fu & Simian Liu & Jianqiao Li & Zhenchun Mo, 2023. "Urban Ecological Environment Quality Evaluation and Territorial Spatial Planning Response: Application to Changsha, Central China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Ji Zhang & Pei Zhang & Xinchen Gu & Mingjiang Deng & Xiaoying Lai & Aihua Long & Xiaoya Deng, 2023. "Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Pattern Changes and Driving Forces of Xinjiang Plain Oases Based on Geodetector," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Zhiyun Chen & Renrong Chen & Quan Guo & Yinglong Hu, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Change of Urban Ecologic Environment Quality Based on RSEI—Taking Meizhou City, China as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Kaili Zhang & Rongrong Feng & Zhicheng Zhang & Chun Deng & Hongjuan Zhang & Kang Liu, 2022. "Exploring the Driving Factors of Remote Sensing Ecological Index Changes from the Perspective of Geospatial Differentiation: A Case Study of the Weihe River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Wenyu Wang & Chenghui Liu & Hongbo Yang & Guoyin Cai, 2023. "The Forecast of Beijing Habitat Quality Dynamics Considering the Government Land Use Planning and the City’s Spatial Heterogeneity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Jie Yang & Yanan Ding & Lin Zhang, 2022. "Conceptualizing and Measuring Megacity Resilience with an Integrated Approach: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    8. Weihua Liao, 2023. "Using Knowledge Granularity Entropy to Measure Eco-Environmental Impacts of Land Cover Changes in ASEAN from 2001 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Yongbin Zhang & Tanglei Song & Jihao Fan & Weidong Man & Mingyue Liu & Yongqiang Zhao & Hao Zheng & Yahui Liu & Chunyu Li & Jingru Song & Xiaowu Yang & Junmin Du, 2022. "Land Use and Climate Change Altered the Ecological Quality in the Luanhe River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Guoqiang Ma & Qiujie Li & Jinxiu Zhang & Lixun Zhang & Hua Cheng & Zhengping Ju & Guojun Sun, 2022. "Simulation and Analysis of Land-Use Change Based on the PLUS Model in the Fuxian Lake Basin (Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau, China)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Jie Yu & Wei Zhao & Junjun Zhu, 2023. "The Construction of Chinese Metropolitan Area from the Perspective of Politics of Scale: A Case Study of Nanjing Metropolitan Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Yu Fang & Xulian Wang & Yufei Cheng & Zhongjing Wang, 2022. "Oasis Change Characteristics and Influencing Factors in the Shiyang River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8464-:d:1153749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.