IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8299-d1151006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Power Grid Investment Considering Renewable Energy Development from the Perspective of Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Hongliang Tian

    (State Grid Ningxia Electric Power Co. Ltd., Yinchuan 750001, China)

  • Liang Zhao

    (State Grid Ningxia Electric Power Co. Ltd., Yinchuan 750001, China)

  • Sen Guo

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

To cope with the rapid development of renewable energy, the power grid system needs to invest in and construct transmission and distribution projects. Means of evaluating the economic, social, and environmental benefits generated by power grid investment are of great significance for enterprise cost recovery and government policy formulation. In this paper, an evaluation of the comprehensive benefit of a power grid investment considering renewable energy development from the perspective of sustainability is developed through the use of a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. The entropy weight method and fuzzy best worst method (BWM) are jointly employed to weight the comprehensive benefit criteria, which include economic, social, and environmental criteria and eight sub-criteria, and the measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) method is utilized to evaluate the comprehensive benefit of a power grid investment. Five power grid investment projects for connecting renewable energy generation to a power grid in Ningxia, China, are selected as a case study, and the results indicate that the power grid investment project PGIP#1 has the largest comprehensive benefit (0.7099), followed by PGIP#3 (0.6800), PGIP#2 (0.6709), PGIP#5 (0.5959), and PGIP#4 (0.5861). The sensitivity analysis shows that the comprehensive benefit of PGIP#1 is always the best, indicating the robustness of the proposed method. By employing the proposed MCDM method to assess the comprehensive benefit of power grid investment projects, this research identifies outstanding projects which can provide guidance for the management of power grid investment and promote the sustainable development of the power industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongliang Tian & Liang Zhao & Sen Guo, 2023. "Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Power Grid Investment Considering Renewable Energy Development from the Perspective of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8299-:d:1151006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8299/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. She, Zhen-Yu & Meng, Gang & Xie, Bai-Chen & O'Neill, Eoghan, 2020. "The effectiveness of the unbundling reform in China’s power system from a dynamic efficiency perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Qian Bao & Zhu Yuxin & Wang Yuxiao & Yan Feng, 2020. "Can Entropy Weight Method Correctly Reflect the Distinction of Water Quality Indices?," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(11), pages 3667-3674, September.
    3. Yongli Wang & Shanshan Song & Mingchen Gao & Jingyan Wang & Jinrong Zhu & Zhongfu Tan, 2020. "Accounting for the Life Cycle Cost of Power Grid Projects by Employing a System Dynamics Technique: A Power Reform Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-28, April.
    4. Brinkerink, Maarten & Gallachóir, Brian Ó & Deane, Paul, 2019. "A comprehensive review on the benefits and challenges of global power grids and intercontinental interconnectors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 274-287.
    5. Liu, Da & Liu, Yumeng & Sun, Kun, 2021. "Policy impact of cancellation of wind and photovoltaic subsidy on power generation companies in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 134-147.
    6. Heesun Jang, 2020. "Market Impacts of a Transmission Investment: Evidence from the ERCOT Competitive Renewable Energy Zones Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Lazar Gitelman & Elena Magaril & Mikhail Kozhevnikov, 2023. "Energy Security: New Threats and Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Guo, Hongye & Davidson, Michael R. & Chen, Qixin & Zhang, Da & Jiang, Nan & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing & Zhang, Xiliang, 2020. "Power market reform in China: Motivations, progress, and recommendations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, T. & Gao, C. & Pollitt, M. & Chen, T. & Ming H., 2022. "Measuring the effects of power system reform in Jiangsu province, China from the perspective of Social Cost Benefit Analysis," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2247, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Zhang, Haoran & Li, Ruixiong & Cai, Xingrui & Zheng, Chaoyue & Liu, Laibao & Liu, Maodian & Zhang, Qianru & Lin, Huiming & Chen, Long & Wang, Xuejun, 2022. "Do electricity flows hamper regional economic–environmental equity?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    3. Wang, Yadong & Wang, Delu & Shi, Xunpeng, 2023. "Sustainable development pathways of China's wind power industry under uncertainties: Perspective from economic benefits and technical potential," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Chen, Hao & Cui, Jian & Song, Feng & Jiang, Zhigao, 2022. "Evaluating the impacts of reforming and integrating China's electricity sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Shuangquan Liu & Yanxuan Huang & Yue Wang & Qizhuan Shao & Han Zhou & Jinwen Wang & Cheng Chen, 2023. "Incentive Mechanisms to Integrate More Renewable Energy in Electricity Markets in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Peng Hao & Jun-Peng Guo & Eoghan O’Neill & Yong-Heng Shi, 2023. "When Will First-Price Work Well? The Impact of Anti-Corruption Rules on Photovoltaic Power Generation Procurement Auctions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Guang, Fengtao & Wen, Le & Sharp, Basil, 2022. "Energy efficiency improvements and industry transition: An analysis of China's electricity consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    8. Liu, Yang & Jiang, Zhigao & Guo, Bowei, 2022. "Assessing China’s provincial electricity spot market pilot operations: Lessons from Guangdong province," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    9. Kaiyan Wang & Xueyan Wang & Rong Jia & Jian Dang & Yan Liang & Haodong Du, 2022. "Research on Coupled Cooperative Operation of Medium- and Long-Term and Spot Electricity Transaction for Multi-Energy System: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Wang, Yongli & Zhou, Minhan & Zhang, Fuli & Zhang, Yuli & Ma, Yuze & Dong, Huanran & Zhang, Danyang & Liu, Lin, 2021. "Chinese grid investment based on transmission and distribution tariff policy: An optimal coordination between capacity and demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    11. Bin Xu, 2022. "How to Efficiently Reduce the Carbon Intensity of the Heavy Industry in China? Using Quantile Regression Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Dan Tong & David J. Farnham & Lei Duan & Qiang Zhang & Nathan S. Lewis & Ken Caldeira & Steven J. Davis, 2021. "Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Jiang, Xin & Jin, Yang & Zheng, Xueyuan & Hu, Guobao & Zeng, Qingshan, 2020. "Optimal configuration of grid-side battery energy storage system under power marketization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    14. Meng, Ming & Pang, Tingting, 2022. "Operational efficiency analysis of China's electric power industry using a dynamic network slack-based measure model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    15. Ardelean, Mircea & Minnebo, Philip, 2023. "The suitability of seas and shores for building submarine power interconnections," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    16. Galimova, Tansu & Satymov, Rasul & Keiner, Dominik & Breyer, Christian, 2024. "Sustainable energy transition of Greenland and its prospects as a potential Arctic e-fuel and e-chemical export hub for Europe and East Asia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    17. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Wieslaw Grebski, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Domestic Production and Import of Hard Coal in Poland: Conclusions for Energy Policy and Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Zhang, Tao & Li, Hong-Zhou & Xie, Bai-Chen, 2022. "Have renewables and market-oriented reforms constrained the technical efficiency improvement of China's electric grid utilities?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Sattich, Thomas & Freeman, Duncan & Scholten, Daniel & Yan, Shaohua, 2021. "Renewable energy in EU-China relations: Policy interdependence and its geopolitical implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    20. Li, Tianyu & Gao, Ciwei & Chen, Tao & Jiang, Yu & Feng, Yingchun, 2022. "Medium and long-term electricity market trading strategy considering renewable portfolio standard in the transitional period of electricity market reform in Jiangsu, China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8299-:d:1151006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.