IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p74-d1010069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Short-Term Traffic Congestion Prediction Using Hybrid Deep Learning Technique

Author

Listed:
  • Mohandu Anjaneyulu

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering (SCOPE), Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, India)

  • Mohan Kubendiran

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering (SCOPE), Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, India)

Abstract

A vital problem faced by urban areas, traffic congestion impacts wealth, climate, and air pollution in cities. Sustainable transportation systems (STSs) play a crucial role in traffic congestion prediction for adopting transportation networks to improve the efficiency and capacity of traffic management. In STSs, one of the essential functional areas is the advanced traffic management system, which alleviates traffic congestion by locating traffic bottlenecks to intensify the interpretation of the traffic network. Furthermore, in urban areas, accurate short-term traffic congestion forecasting is critical for designing transport infrastructure and for the real-time optimization of traffic. The main objective of this paper was to devise a method to predict short-term traffic congestion (STTC) every 5 min over 1 h. This paper proposes a hybrid Xception support vector machine (XPSVM) classifier model to predict STTC. Primarily, the Xception classifier uses separable convolution, ReLU, and convolution techniques to predict the feature detection in the dataset. Secondarily, the support vector machine (SVM) classifier operates maximum marginal separations to predict the output more accurately using the weight regularization technique and a fine-tuned binary hyperplane mechanism. The dataset used in this work was taken from Google Maps and comprised snapshots of Bangalore, Karnataka, taken using the Selenium automation tool. The experimental outcome showed that the proposed model forecasted traffic congestion with an accuracy of 97.16%.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohandu Anjaneyulu & Mohan Kubendiran, 2022. "Short-Term Traffic Congestion Prediction Using Hybrid Deep Learning Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:74-:d:1010069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/74/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/74/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaolei Ma & Haiyang Yu & Yunpeng Wang & Yinhai Wang, 2015. "Large-Scale Transportation Network Congestion Evolution Prediction Using Deep Learning Theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Alisoltani, Negin & Leclercq, Ludovic & Zargayouna, Mahdi, 2021. "Can dynamic ride-sharing reduce traffic congestion?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 212-246.
    3. Alireza Ermagun & David Levinson, 2018. "Spatiotemporal traffic forecasting: review and proposed directions," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 786-814, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chikaraishi, Makoto & Garg, Prateek & Varghese, Varun & Yoshizoe, Kazuki & Urata, Junji & Shiomi, Yasuhiro & Watanabe, Ryuki, 2020. "On the possibility of short-term traffic prediction during disaster with machine learning approaches: An exploratory analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 91-104.
    2. Shuanfeng Zhao & Chao Wang & Pei Wei & Qingqing Zhao, 2020. "Research on the Deep Recognition of Urban Road Vehicle Flow Based on Deep Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Mayara Moraes Monteiro & Carlos M. Lima Azevedo & Maria Kamargianni & Yoram Shiftan & Ayelet Gal-Tzur & Sharon Shoshany Tavory & Constantinos Antoniou & Guido Cantelmo, 2022. "Car-Sharing Subscription Preferences: The Case of Copenhagen, Munich, and Tel Aviv-Yafo," Papers 2206.02448, arXiv.org.
    4. Hao, Wu & Martin, Layla, 2022. "Prohibiting cherry-picking: Regulating vehicle sharing services who determine fleet and service structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Zhang, Wenqing & Liu, Liangliang, 2022. "Exploring non-users' intention to adopt ride-sharing services: Taking into account increased risks due to the COVID-19 pandemic among other factors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 180-195.
    6. Kaffash, Sepideh & Nguyen, An Truong & Zhu, Joe, 2021. "Big data algorithms and applications in intelligent transportation system: A review and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    7. Gutierrez-Lythgoe, Antonio, 2023. "Movilidad urbana sostenible: Predicción de demanda con Inteligencia Artificial [Sustainable Urban Mobility: Demand Prediction with Artificial Intelligence]," MPRA Paper 117103, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Muhammad Aqib & Rashid Mehmood & Ahmed Alzahrani & Iyad Katib & Aiiad Albeshri & Saleh M. Altowaijri, 2019. "Rapid Transit Systems: Smarter Urban Planning Using Big Data, In-Memory Computing, Deep Learning, and GPUs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-33, May.
    9. Yining Liu & Yanfeng Ouyang, 2022. "Planning ride-pooling services with detour restrictions for spatially heterogeneous demand: A multi-zone queuing network approach," Papers 2208.02219, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    10. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    11. Künnen, Jan-Rasmus & Strauss, Arne K., 2022. "The value of flexible flight-to-route assignments in pre-tactical air traffic management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 76-96.
    12. Beojone, Caio Vitor & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2023. "A dynamic multi-region MFD model for ride-sourcing with ridesplitting," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    13. Krzysztof Cebrat & Maciej Sobczyński, 2016. "Scaling Laws in City Growth: Setting Limitations with Self-Organizing Maps," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Xing, Jiping & Wu, Wei & Cheng, Qixiu & Liu, Ronghui, 2022. "Traffic state estimation of urban road networks by multi-source data fusion: Review and new insights," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 595(C).
    15. Tang, Jinjun & Zhang, Shen & Zhang, Wenhui & Liu, Fang & Zhang, Weibin & Wang, Yinhai, 2016. "Statistical properties of urban mobility from location-based travel networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 461(C), pages 694-707.
    16. Wang, Minjie & Yang, Su & Sun, Yi & Gao, Jun, 2017. "Discovering urban mobility patterns with PageRank based traffic modeling and prediction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 485(C), pages 23-34.
    17. Huan Ngo & Sabyasachee Mishra, 2023. "Traffic Graph Convolutional Network for Dynamic Urban Travel Speed Estimation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 179-222, March.
    18. Feng, Xuan & Lin, Qinping & Jia, Ning & Tian, Junfang, 2024. "The actual impact of ride-splitting: An empirical study based on large-scale GPS data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 94-112.
    19. Xianwang Li & Zhongxiang Huang & Saihu Liu & Jinxin Wu & Yuxiang Zhang, 2023. "Short-Term Subway Passenger Flow Prediction Based on Time Series Adaptive Decomposition and Multi-Model Combination (IVMD-SE-MSSA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-30, May.
    20. Maheshwari, Saurabh, 2020. "Network Sensor Error Quantification and Flow Reconstruction Using Deep Learning," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2qk093gx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:74-:d:1010069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.