IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p716-d1021199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How the Target Positioning of the S&T Innovation Platform Impacts Its Network Innovation Capability in China

Author

Listed:
  • Gulizhaer Aisaiti

    (School of Business, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China
    College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Qi Dong

    (School of Business, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China)

  • Ling Liang

    (School of Business Administration, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Jiqing Xie

    (College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Jiaping Xie

    (School of Business, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China
    College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

The Scientific and Technological Innovation Platform (hereafter S&T innovation platform) accumulates rich innovation resources, co-ordinates the interest between multiple innovation subjects, promotes the sharing of innovation resources, and thus enhances the platform’s network innovation capability. Therefore, based on the perspective of the target positioning of the S&T innovation platform, this paper explores the improvement path of the platform’s network innovation capability. Through empirical research, we found that the target positioning of the S&T innovation platform helps to improve the platform’s network innovation capability. The mediating mechanism of construction logic and transformational logic enhances the S&T innovation platform’s network innovation capability. At the same time, this paper studies the influence of boundary factors, such as government guidance and market lead, on the network innovation capability of S&T innovation platforms and finds that the market lead moderating effect impacts the network innovation capability of S&T innovation platforms through commercial logic and transformational logic. The government guidance positively moderates the relationship between the target positioning of the S&T innovation platform and the commercial logic under construction logic. The moderating effect under the joint impact of market lead and government guidance enhances the network innovation capability of the S&T innovation platform using social logic and transformational logic. The novelty and uniqueness of the research are based on the innovation network theory, integrating construction logic and transformational logic, and enriching the boundary conditions to enhance the network innovation capability of the S&T innovation platform by introducing the roles of market lead and government guidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Gulizhaer Aisaiti & Qi Dong & Ling Liang & Jiqing Xie & Jiaping Xie, 2022. "How the Target Positioning of the S&T Innovation Platform Impacts Its Network Innovation Capability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:716-:d:1021199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/716/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/716/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Yi-Hsin & Lin, Feng-Jyh & Wang, Kuo-Hsiung, 2021. "The effect of social mission on service quality and brand image," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 744-752.
    2. Yibin Li & Guiqing Zhang & Longjun Liu, 2021. "Platform Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Innovation Performance: A Cross-Layer Study Mediated by Employee Intrapreneurship," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    3. Yongming Huang & David Audretsch & Megan Hewitt, 2013. "Chinese technology transfer policy: the case of the national independent innovation demonstration zone of East Lake," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 38(6), pages 828-835, December.
    4. Anja Dettmann & Sidonia Proff & Thomas Brenner, 2015. "Co-operation over distance? The spatial dimension of inter-organizational innovation collaboration," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 729-753, September.
    5. Tsui, Anne S. & Wang, Hui & Xin, Katherine R., 2006. "Organizational Culture in China: An Analysis of Culture Dimensions and Culture Types," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 345-376, November.
    6. Ling Liang & Zishu Han & Jiaping Xie & Jialiang Wang & Nan Shi & Weijun Zhu, 2022. "S&T Innovation Platform Sharing Service Contract Mechanism to Achieve Supply Chain Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Stoyan V. Sgourev & Ezra W. Zuckerman, 2011. "Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network," Rationality and Society, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-34, February.
    8. Hai Guo & Zhuen Yang & Ran Huang & Anqi Guo, 2020. "The digitalization and public crisis responses of small and medium enterprises: Implications from a COVID-19 survey," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Chi, Maomao & Wang, Weijun & Lu, Xinyuan & George, Joey F., 2018. "Antecedents and outcomes of collaborative innovation capabilities on the platform collaboration environment," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 273-283.
    10. Jiaping Xie & Haicheng Jia & Qi Dong & Gulizhaer Aisaiti, 2022. "Research on the Governance Mechanism of Independent Innovation Network in the Core Area of Silk Road Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    11. Yong Jae Shin & Yongrok Choi, 2019. "Feasibility of the Fintech Industry as an Innovation Platform for Sustainable Economic Growth in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Bhattarai, Charan Raj & Kwong, Caleb C.Y. & Tasavori, Misagh, 2019. "Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 47-60.
    13. Anne S. Tsui & Hui Wang & Katherine R. Xin, 2006. "Organizational Culture in China: An Analysis of Culture Dimensions and Culture Types," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 2(3), pages 345-376, November.
    14. Kwaku Atuahene-Gima & Anthony Ko, 2001. "An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 54-74, February.
    15. Todd W. Moss & Jeremy C. Short & G. Tyge Payne & G.T. Lumpkin, 2011. "Dual Identities in Social Ventures: An Exploratory Study," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(4), pages 805-830, July.
    16. Chen, Kaihua & Zhang, Yi & Zhu, Guilong & Mu, Rongping, 2020. "Do research institutes benefit from their network positions in research collaboration networks with industries or/and universities?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 94.
    17. Seyedeh Khadijeh Taghizadeh & Syed Abidur Rahman & Choo Ling Suan & Ali Vafaei-Zadeh, 2022. "Value co-creation and innovation performance: insight knowledge from companies and customers in the Malaysian hotel industry," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 279-300.
    18. Olga A. Romanova & Evgeny Kuzmin, 2021. "Industrial Policy: A New Reality in the Context of Digital Transformation of the Economy," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Vikas Kumar & Jafar Rezaei & Victoria Akberdina & Evgeny Kuzmin (ed.), Digital Transformation in Industry, pages 13-23, Springer.
    19. Nambisan, Satish & Wright, Mike & Feldman, Maryann, 2019. "The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    20. Guan, JianCheng & Yam, Richard C.M., 2015. "Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 273-282.
    21. Fisher, Greg & Kuratko, Donald F. & Bloodgood, James M. & Hornsby, Jeffrey S., 2017. "Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 52-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaja Prystupa, 2017. "The Role of Organizational Culture in KnowledgeManagement in Small Companies," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(3), pages 151-173.
    2. Juelin Yin & Yuli Zhang, 2012. "Institutional Dynamics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in an Emerging Country Context: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 301-316, December.
    3. Jiajing Sun & Michael Cole & Zhiyuan Huang & Shouyang Wang, 2019. "Chinese leadership: Provincial perspectives on promotion and performance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(4), pages 750-772, June.
    4. Bai, Yuntao & Lin, Li & Li, Peter Ping, 2016. "How to enable employee creativity in a team context: A cross-level mediating process of transformational leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3240-3250.
    5. Shangkun Xu & Rudai Yang, 2010. "Indigenous Characteristics of Chinese Corporate Social Responsibility Conceptual Paradigm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(2), pages 321-333, May.
    6. Soda, Giuseppe & Zaheer, Akbar & Sun, Xiaoming & Cui, Wentian, 2021. "Brokerage evolution in innovation contexts: Formal structure, network neighborhoods and knowledge," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    7. Wei Li & Jianxun Chen & Hans Hendrischke, 2017. "An Institutional Perspective on Individual Work Well-Being: Evidence from China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 187-218, May.
    8. Molecke, Greg & Pinkse, Jonatan, 2017. "Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 550-568.
    9. Chenguang Li & Zhenjun Qiu & Tao Fu, 2021. "The Role of Policy Perceptions and Entrepreneurs’ Preferences in Firms’ Response to Industry 4.0: The Case of Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Fotis Kitsios & Evangelia Nousopoulou & Maria Kamariotou, 2023. "Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation in the COVID-19 Era: Implications from Driving Schools," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-12, November.
    11. Crespo, Nuno Fernandes & Crespo, Cátia Fernandes & Silva, Graça Miranda & Nicola, Maura Bedin, 2023. "Innovation in times of crisis: The relevance of digitalization and early internationalization strategies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Liu, Lana Y.J. & Pan, Fei, 2007. "The implementation of Activity-Based Costing in China: An innovation action research approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 249-264.
    13. Ardito, Lorenzo & Raby, Simon & Albino, Vito & Bertoldi, Bernardo, 2021. "The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 44-56.
    14. Bradley J. Koch & Pamela Tremain Koch & Yiheng Deng, 2023. "China and U.S. organizational culture via value statements: an emic-etic yin-yang approach," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 1094-1130, July.
    15. Ermira KALAJ & Erjola BARBULLUSHI, 2023. "How And How Much Digitalization Affected Enterprise Performance During Covid-19 Pandemic," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 97-108, June.
    16. Song Yang & Bruce W. Stening, 2013. "Mao Meets the Market," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 419-448, June.
    17. Edward Aihua Fang & Na Yang, 2021. "More work cooperation or relationship harmony in mass customization? The impacts of personalized design, modular design, and automated processes," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 179-192, September.
    18. Ekka Susmita & Singh Punam, 2022. "Predicting HR Professionals’ Adoption of HR Analytics: An Extension of UTAUT Model," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 55(1), pages 77-93, February.
    19. Jaewan Yang & Joon Yeol Lew, 2020. "Implementing Sustainable Human Resources Practices: Leadership Style Matters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Chen, Shih-Chih & Jiang, Wei & Ma, Yin, 2020. "Decent work in a transition economy: An empirical study of employees in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:716-:d:1021199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.