IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14124-d957321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

S&T Innovation Platform Sharing Service Contract Mechanism to Achieve Supply Chain Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Liang

    (School of Management, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Zishu Han

    (College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Jiaping Xie

    (College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Jialiang Wang

    (School of International Business, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Nan Shi

    (School of Management, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Weijun Zhu

    (School of Economics & Management, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China)

Abstract

While achieving fruitful patents in innovation, enterprises can face bottlenecks in industrial transformation. The fundamental cause of such difficulties is the lack of pilot equipment. To this end, the science and technology (S&T) innovation platform introduces equipment sharing to solve the problems in transforming enterprise patents. Based on the premise that service demand is endogenous to platform service effort and user relationship resilience, this paper introduces revenue-sharing and cost-sharing contract mechanisms. It constructs a Stackelberg game model between S&T innovation platforms and enterprise users. Further, we explore the decision-making optimization involving platform service pricing, service effort, and a user’s relationship resilience. Our main findings are: (1) service pricing and relationship resilience show supermodularity to the platform revenue while showing submodularity to the user revenue. (2) The optimal user relationship resilience always indicates a decreasing trend in the pricing of platform services. (3) The platform and users have their preferences for contract types. When the platform dominates the game, they tend to adopt a revenue-sharing contract. When the users dominate, they are more willing to implement a cost-sharing contract. (4) As the S&T innovation platform strengthens the connection between the platform and users through the revenue- and cost-sharing contracts, it further enhances the supply chain collaboration among equipment suppliers, technology innovation platforms, and users, thereby achieving the purpose of improving supply chain sustainability and resilience. Technological innovation is an essential means to improve supply chain sustainability and resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Liang & Zishu Han & Jiaping Xie & Jialiang Wang & Nan Shi & Weijun Zhu, 2022. "S&T Innovation Platform Sharing Service Contract Mechanism to Achieve Supply Chain Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14124-:d:957321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14124/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14124/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kamalahmadi, Masoud & Parast, Mahour Mellat, 2016. "A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 116-133.
    2. Gérard P. Cachon & Kaitlin M. Daniels & Ruben Lobel, 2017. "The Role of Surge Pricing on a Service Platform with Self-Scheduling Capacity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 368-384, July.
    3. Yanan Ji & Yi Li & Wenzhi Tang, 2022. "Service Investment and Pricing Strategies in E-Commerce Platforms With Seller Competition," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Min, Hokey, 2019. "Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 35-45.
    5. Du, Jingshu & Leten, Bart & Vanhaverbeke, Wim, 2014. "Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 828-840.
    6. Xie, JiaPing & Liang, Ling & Liu, LuHao & Ieromonachou, Petros, 2017. "Coordination contracts of dual-channel with cooperation advertising in closed-loop supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 528-538.
    7. Wang, Shiying & Chen, Huimiao & Wu, Desheng, 2019. "Regulating platform competition in two-sided markets under the O2O era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 131-143.
    8. Itay P. Fainmesser & Andrea Galeotti, 2020. "Pricing Network Effects: Competition," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, August.
    9. Andrei Hagiu & Daniel Spulber, 2013. "First-Party Content and Coordination in Two-Sided Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 933-949, April.
    10. Rajesh, R., 2017. "Technological capabilities and supply chain resilience of firms: A relational analysis using Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (TISM)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 161-169.
    11. V. Kumar & Nandini Nim & Amit Agarwal, 2021. "Platform-based mobile payments adoption in emerging and developed countries: Role of country-level heterogeneity and network effects," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(8), pages 1529-1558, October.
    12. Yan, Ruiliang & Pei, Zhi, 2009. "Retail services and firm profit in a dual-channel market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 306-314.
    13. Chu, Shu-Chuan & Chen, Hsuan-Ting & Gan, Chen, 2020. "Consumers’ engagement with corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication in social media: Evidence from China and the United States," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 260-271.
    14. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 2005. "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 30-44, January.
    15. Wioleta Kucharska & Rafał Kowalczyk, 2019. "How to achieve sustainability?—Employee's point of view on company's culture and CSR practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 453-467, March.
    16. Xie, Jiaping & Zhu, Weijun & Wei, Lihong & Liang, Ling, 2021. "Platform competition with partial multi-homing: When both same-side and cross-side network effects exist," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongtao Peng & Hang Li, 2023. "A Rental Platform Service Supply Chain Network Equilibrium Model Considering Digital Detection Technology Investment and Big Data Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Gulizhaer Aisaiti & Qi Dong & Ling Liang & Jiqing Xie & Jiaping Xie, 2022. "How the Target Positioning of the S&T Innovation Platform Impacts Its Network Innovation Capability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Weijun & Xie, Jiaping & Xia, Yu & Wei, Lihong & Liang, Ling, 2023. "Getting more third-party participants on board: Optimal pricing and investment decisions in competitive platform ecosystems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 177-192.
    2. Liu, Bin & Zhao, Xiuyan & Gu, Qiongqiaong, 2024. "Pricing strategy and platform competition with partial multi-homing agents: When the aggregation platform exists in ride-sharing market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Cao, Zong-Hong & Zhou, Yong-Wu & Zhao, Ju & Li, Chang-Wen, 2015. "Entry mode selection and its impact on an incumbent supply chain coordination," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Chen, Xu & Li, Shanshan & Wang, Xiaojun, 2020. "Evaluating the effects of quality regulations on the pharmaceutical supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    5. Yi Zheng & Li Liu & Victor Shi & Wenxing Huang & Jianxiu Liao, 2022. "A Resilience Analysis of a Medical Mask Supply Chain during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Simulation Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Benioudakis, Myron & Zissis, Dimitris & Burnetas, Apostolos & Ioannou, George, 2023. "Service provision on an aggregator platform with time-sensitive customers: Pricing strategies and coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    7. Bai, Jiaru & Tang, Christopher S., 2022. "Can two competing on-demand service platforms be profitable?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    8. Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2019. "OM Forum—New Opportunities for Operations Management Research in Sustainability," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Bender, Mark & Gal-Or, Esther & Geylani, Tansev, 2021. "Attracting artists to music streaming platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1083-1097.
    10. Gang Liu & Fengyue An, 2021. "Video Platforms’ Value-Added Service Investments and Pricing Strategies for Advertisers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Shashi & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Myriam Ertz, 2020. "Managing supply chain resilience to pursue business and environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1215-1246, March.
    12. Gérard P. Cachon, 2020. "A Research Framework for Business Models: What Is Common Among Fast Fashion, E-Tailing, and Ride Sharing?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1172-1192, March.
    13. Lili Dai & Tong Shu & Shou Chen & Shouyang Wang & Kin Keung Lai, 2020. "CSR Remanufacturing Supply Chains under WTP Differentiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Jiaping Xie & Jing Li & Ling Liang & Xu Fang & Guang Yang & Lihong Wei, 2020. "Contracting Emissions Reduction Supply Chain Based on Market Low-Carbon Preference and Carbon Intensity Constraint," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 37(02), pages 1-34, March.
    15. Juhong Chen & Di Wu & Peng Li, 2018. "Research on the Pricing Model of the Dual-Channel Reverse Supply Chain Considering Logistics Costs and Consumers’ Awareness of Sustainability Based on Regional Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-31, June.
    16. Yong He & Hongfu Huang & Dong Li, 2020. "Inventory and pricing decisions for a dual-channel supply chain with deteriorating products," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1461-1503, September.
    17. Yan, Xiaoyu & Liu, Weihua & Tang, Ou & Hou, Jiahe, 2024. "When will an overconfident entrant in the two-sided market do more good than harm?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    18. Xu, Guangye & Dan, Bin & Zhang, Xumei & Liu, Can, 2014. "Coordinating a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse under a two-way revenue sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 171-179.
    19. Peng Li & Di Wu, 2021. "A Multi-Echelon Network Design in a Dual-Channel Reverse Supply Chain Considering Consumer Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Mofidi, Seyed Shahab & Pazour, Jennifer A., 2019. "When is it beneficial to provide freelance suppliers with choice? A hierarchical approach for peer-to-peer logistics platforms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1-23.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14124-:d:957321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.