IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5454-d807101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CO 2 Emission Reduction Potential of Road Transport to Achieve Carbon Neutrality in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jieshuang Dong

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jungong Road, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Yiming Li

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jungong Road, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Wenxiang Li

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jungong Road, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Songze Liu

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jungong Road, Shanghai 200093, China)

Abstract

Under the targets of peaking CO 2 emissions and carbon neutrality in China, it is a matter of urgency to reduce the CO 2 emissions of road transport. To explore the CO 2 emission reduction potential of road transport, this study proposes eight policy scenarios: the business-as-usual (BAU), clean electricity (CE), fuel economy improvement (FEI), shared autonomous vehicles (SAV), CO 2 emission trading (CET) (with low, medium, and high carbon prices), and comprehensive (CS) scenarios. The road transport CO 2 emissions from 2020 to 2060 in these scenarios are calculated based on the bottom-up method and are evaluated in the Low Emissions Analysis Platform (LEAP). The Log-Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) method is employed to analyze the contribution of each factor to road transport CO 2 emission reduction in each scenario. The results show that CO 2 emissions of road transport will peak at 1419.5 million tonnes in 2033 under the BAU scenario. In contrast, the peaks of road transport CO 2 emissions in the CE, SAV, FEI, CET-LCP, CET-MCP, CET-HCP, and CS scenarios are decreasing and occur progressively earlier. Under the CS scenario with the greatest CO 2 emission reduction potential, CO 2 emissions of road transport will peak at 1200.37 million tonnes in 2023 and decrease to 217.73 million tonnes by 2060. Fuel structure and fuel economy contribute most to the emission reduction in all scenarios. This study provides possible pathways toward low-carbon road transport for the goal of carbon neutrality in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Jieshuang Dong & Yiming Li & Wenxiang Li & Songze Liu, 2022. "CO 2 Emission Reduction Potential of Road Transport to Achieve Carbon Neutrality in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5454-:d:807101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5454/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5454/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Hoogwijk, Monique & Barker, Terry & Riahi, Keywan & Boeters, Stefan & Chateau, Jean & Scrieciu, Serban & van Vliet, Jasper & Masui, Toshihiko & Blok, Kornelis & Blomen, Eliane , 2009. "Comparison of top-down and bottom-up estimates of sectoral and regional greenhouse gas emission reduction potentials," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5125-5139, December.
    2. Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin & Yuan, Zhiyi & Yan, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Xiliang, 2018. "Development and application of China provincial road transport energy demand and GHG emissions analysis model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 313-328.
    3. Ye Li & Lei Bao & Wenxiang Li & Haopeng Deng, 2016. "Inventory and Policy Reduction Potential of Greenhouse Gas and Pollutant Emissions of Road Transportation Industry in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Gambhir, Ajay & Tse, Lawrence K.C. & Tong, Danlu & Martinez-Botas, Ricardo, 2015. "Reducing China’s road transport sector CO2 emissions to 2050: Technologies, costs and decomposition analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 905-917.
    5. Li, Wenxiang & Chen, Shawen & Dong, Jieshuang & Wu, Jingxian, 2021. "Exploring the spatial variations of transfer distances between dockless bike-sharing systems and metros," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Jean-Marc Burniaux & Jean Château, 2011. "Mitigation Potential of Removing Fossil Fuel Subsidies: A General Equilibrium Assessment," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 853, OECD Publishing.
    7. Brand, Christian & Tran, Martino & Anable, Jillian, 2012. "The UK transport carbon model: An integrated life cycle approach to explore low carbon futures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 107-124.
    8. Nayum, Alim & Klöckner, Christian A. & Prugsamatz, Sunita, 2013. "Influences of car type class and carbon dioxide emission levels on purchases of new cars: A retrospective analysis of car purchases in Norway," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 96-108.
    9. Yan, Shiyu & Eskeland, Gunnar S., 2018. "Greening the vehicle fleet: Norway's CO2-Differentiated registration tax," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 247-262.
    10. Brand, Christian & Anable, Jillian & Tran, Martino, 2013. "Accelerating the transformation to a low carbon passenger transport system: The role of car purchase taxes, feebates, road taxes and scrappage incentives in the UK," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 132-148.
    11. Denis Dineen & Lisa Ryan & Brian Ó Gallachóir, 2018. "Vehicle tax policies and new passenger car CO2 performance in EU member states," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 396-412, April.
    12. Wenxiang Li & Luqi Wang & Ye Li & Bo Liu, 2021. "A blockchain-based emissions trading system for the road transport sector: policy design and evaluation," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 337-352, March.
    13. Li, Wenxiang & Bao, Lei & Wang, Luqi & Li, Ye & Mai, Xianmin, 2019. "Comparative evaluation of global low-carbon urban transport," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 14-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Jiayi & Tan-Soo, Jie-Sheng & Chu, Yanlai & Zhang, Xiao-Bing, 2023. "Gasoline price and fuel economy of new automobiles: Evidence from Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Guo, Xiaoyan & He, Junliang & Yu, Hang & Liu, Mei, 2023. "Carbon peak simulation and peak pathway analysis for hub-and-spoke container intermodal network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Yongsheng Cao & Yongquan Wang, 2022. "Smart Carbon Emission Scheduling for Electric Vehicles via Reinforcement Learning under Carbon Peak Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Jiang, Meizhi & Wang, Benmei & Hao, Yingjun & Chen, Shijun & Wen, Yuanqiao & Yang, Zaili, 2024. "Quantification of CO2 emissions in transportation: An empirical analysis by modal shift from road to waterway transport in Zhejiang, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 177-186.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. AlSabbagh, Maha & Siu, Yim Ling & Guehnemann, Astrid & Barrett, John, 2017. "Integrated approach to the assessment of CO2e-mitigation measures for the road passenger transport sector in Bahrain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 203-215.
    2. Hall, Lisa M.H. & Buckley, Alastair R., 2016. "A review of energy systems models in the UK: Prevalent usage and categorisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 607-628.
    3. Tattini, Jacopo & Ramea, Kalai & Gargiulo, Maurizio & Yang, Christopher & Mulholland, Eamonn & Yeh, Sonia & Karlsson, Kenneth, 2018. "Improving the representation of modal choice into bottom-up optimization energy system models – The MoCho-TIMES model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 265-282.
    4. Brand, Christian, 2016. "Beyond ‘Dieselgate’: Implications of unaccounted and future air pollutant emissions and energy use for cars in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Liu, Junling & Yin, Mingjian & Xia-Hou, Qinrui & Wang, Ke & Zou, Ji, 2021. "Comparison of sectoral low-carbon transition pathways in China under the nationally determined contribution and 2 °C targets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Jing Gan & Linheng Li & Qiaojun Xiang & Bin Ran, 2020. "A Prediction Method of GHG Emissions for Urban Road Transportation Planning and Its Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Morton, Craig & Anable, Jillian & Yeboah, Godwin & Cottrill, Caitlin, 2018. "The spatial pattern of demand in the early market for electric vehicles: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 119-130.
    8. Xianchun Tan & Yuan Zeng & Baihe Gu & Yi Wang & Baoguang Xu, 2018. "Scenario Analysis of Urban Road Transportation Energy Demand and GHG Emissions in China—A Case Study for Chongqing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-32, June.
    9. Zawieska, Jakub & Pieriegud, Jana, 2018. "Smart city as a tool for sustainable mobility and transport decarbonisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 39-50.
    10. Li, Wenxiang & Bao, Lei & Wang, Luqi & Li, Ye & Mai, Xianmin, 2019. "Comparative evaluation of global low-carbon urban transport," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 14-26.
    11. Zhu, Lichao, 2023. "Comparative evaluation of CO2 emissions from transportation in countries around the world," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    12. Harrison, Gillian & Thiel, Christian, 2017. "An exploratory policy analysis of electric vehicle sales competition and sensitivity to infrastructure in Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 165-178.
    13. Schwanitz, Valeria Jana & Piontek, Franziska & Bertram, Christoph & Luderer, Gunnar, 2014. "Long-term climate policy implications of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 882-894.
    14. Brand, Christian & Cluzel, Celine & Anable, Jillian, 2017. "Modeling the uptake of plug-in vehicles in a heterogeneous car market using a consumer segmentation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 121-136.
    15. Lasse Fridstrøm, 2021. "The Norwegian Vehicle Electrification Policy and Its Implicit Price of Carbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Xiaomei Li & Yiwen Zhang & Zijie Yang & Yijun Zhu & Cihang Li & Wenxiang Li, 2023. "Modeling Choice Behaviors for Ridesplitting under a Carbon Credit Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Bu, Chujie & Cui, Xueqin & Li, Ruiyao & Li, Jin & Zhang, Yaxin & Wang, Can & Cai, Wenjia, 2021. "Achieving net-zero emissions in China’s passenger transport sector through regionally tailored mitigation strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    18. Brand, Christian & Anable, Jillian & Ketsopoulou, Ioanna & Watson, Jim, 2020. "Road to zero or road to nowhere? Disrupting transport and energy in a zero carbon world," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    19. Lu, Youshui & Li, Yue & Tang, Xiaojun & Cai, Bowei & Wang, Hua & Liu, Lei & Wan, Shaohua & Yu, Keping, 2022. "STRICTs: A Blockchain-enabled Smart Emission Cap Restrictive and Carbon Permit Trading System," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    20. Bergeaud, Antonin & Raimbault, Juste, 2020. "An empirical analysis of the spatial variability of fuel prices in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 131-143.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5454-:d:807101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.